An editor keeps moving the Hitler entry from the main list to the "disputed vegetarians" section, typified by this edit. I took the dispute to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Disputing Hitler's vegetarianism, but there was only a single impartial response and the other party does not believe this constitutes a consensus. Therefore I have started this RFC to establish whether Hitler be added to disputed vegetarian section or remain in the vegetarian section? Betty Logan (talk) 10:30, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Please see restored edits below and the concerns raised about wording, consensus, weight, and citations. Are the concerns raised valid, does the wording need to be changed, or is the restored wording acceptable? Gallic Village (talk) 07:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Should any of the following be added at the end of the WP:BLPSPS subsection?
1) However, if a living person promotes pseudoscience or fringe theories, or has published work that is inconsistent with accepted scientific or scholarly methods, the WP:PSCI policy and WP:FRINGE guideline come into play with respect to that theories or work. Content about that person's theories or work may be sourced to high quality expert third party SPS per WP:PARITY; such sources may only be used to generate content about the theory or work, not the person.[a]
1a) Same as 1), but including at the end: "Content generated using such sources should be attributed if it goes beyond simple facts" [b]
1b) Same as 1), but including at the end: "Content generated using such sources should be attributed."
Do you think that the DH Lawrence Wikipedia page and the ‘Philosophy and Politics’ section in particular should include differing perspectives on whether Lawrence held authoritarian, even ‘proto-fascist’, views throughout his adult life? More particularly, do you think that the views of Bertrand Russell and Terry Eagleton should be counter-balanced by the inclusion of the views of prominent biographers of Lawrence, John Worthen and Brenda Maddox, who quote letters written later in life by Lawrence, and by the inclusion of a quote from Lawrence’s own essay ‘Democracy’?
Per @Only in death:'s request, I have formally included a request for comments regarding Lori Maddox's inclusion in this article. The reasons I give are listed in the above "Lori Maddox" section. To summarize them briefly, his involvement with her is well-documented. Even the Rolling Stone publication has admitted to the facts of the nature of their relationship. The biggest reason she has NOT been included, according to the discussion above, is because of the back-and-forth edit warring that went on regarding HOW to include her. I believe that the difficulties in reaching an agreement on how to include her in the article do not justify leaving her out altogether.
For the reasons above, I have created this request for comments to answer the following question: **Should Lori Maddox be mentioned in the article?** (We can leave the "how" to a later discussion IF the consensus here is "yes." For now, I just want to see if there is a consensus that she SHOULD be included). Obviously my vote is "yes." RfC relisted by Cunard (talk) at 00:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Trump first stirred controversy in Republican politics over his promotion of birther conspiracy theories, alleging that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States.Snooganssnoogans (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Request on comment on nationality in lead. Should it use Chinese born Hongkong-British-Amercian (full relevant nationality and ethnic group), or British-Amercian (according to Nobel Foundation) or none (according to his personal statement in Standard Chinese (Mandarin) in RTHK documentary and interview, which was quoted by notable columnist Simon Shen) Matthew_hktc18:07, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
For the band Led Zeppelin, should rock and roll be included in the list of genres in the infobox? There is some discussion on the matter on the article's talk page, here, as well as on the some of the archived talk pages,
here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
and here
(please note there could be more discussions that were missed). The genre section in the infobox currently lists; Hard rock, blues rock, folk rock, heavy metal & rock and roll. The first four genres listed are not in dispute at this time, nor or any other possible genre that are not listed. So, to recap, and to be clear, do you "support" inclusion or "oppose" inclusion of "rock and roll" in the list of genres? Thank you RfC relisted by Cunard (talk) at 01:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Should the letter from the Orthodox Rabbis be included in the “Allegations of antisemitism and responses” section? Arguments for and against are in the “Letter from Orthodox Rabbis is Valid” section of the talk page. Burrobert (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
