Jump to content

Talk:Fuller House (TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.169.130.165 (talk) at 02:22, 13 March 2019 (→External links modified). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Episode titles?

Resolved

Found these on IMDB/other sites..

"Our Very First Show, Again" Episode 1 and 2 "Moving Day" Episode 3 "The Not-So-Great Escape" Episode 4

source Npamusic (talk) 00:42, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Olsen Recurring?

Resolved

It's stated on the article in more than one place that neither of the Olsen twins will be returning to the series to reprise the role as Michelle. So why is Ashley listed as "recurring?" Just wondering. Aidensdaddy2k9 (talk) 20:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Generally negative reviews?

"Fuller House received generally negative reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes the series has a rating of 31%, based on 32 reviews." The same site says, that 80% of the audience likes this series. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/fuller-house/ Isn't it relevant that the series is loved by the audience? --89.0.215.249 (talk) 02:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, but not by Rotten Tomatoes' calculations. That is not an accurate depiction, as the number varies, based on a reader's location and some other factors. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Season 2 episode titles?

Episode titles and prod. codes have been added for all 13 episodes, however no source is listed. And as far I can tell, there's no reliable source that lists any official titles and codes besides "Welcome Back." Unless a source is found, it's probably best to remove the titles until tomorrow morning when we know for sure and it's listed on Netflix's site.24.35.162.197 (talk) 02:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the edits. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A sentence in the lede keeps getting deleted

Several IP editors have removed the same sentence at the end of the lede [1][2][3], which reads Fuller House has received generally unfavorable reviews from television critics. While this is supported later in the article under the Reception section, I myself am debating whether that sentence is necessary in the lede. But I've reverted the removal twice because the IP failed to explain or misled other editors by saying "Added content". MPFitz1968 (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I'm not sure that should be in the lede. WP:TVLEAD doesn't make much specific mention of this, aside from instructing to avoid "peacock" terms like "award-winning", but I suspect mentioning unfavorable reviews in the lede might be considered "undue" the other way. I'd advise restricting what's in that sentence to the 'Reception' section, I think... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The sentence should be there. Speaking of WP:TVLEAD, it is said that after the opening paragraph of an article about a series, "subsequent paragraph(s) should summarize the major points of the rest of the article: basic production information (e.g. where the show is filmed), principal cast of the show, critical reception, influences, place in popular culture, major awards, and anything else that made the show unique [...] The length of the lead should conform to readers' expectations of a short, but useful and complete, summary of the topic [...] A general rule of thumb is to write at least one sentence on each section of the article". AndrewOne (talk) 04:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time to WP:SPLIT episodes into their own article?

An IP recently attempted to transfer the episodes to a LoE article (List of Fuller House episodes) (from [4] to [5]), but did not do a proper WP:SPLIT, which includes providing attribution in the edit summaries as stated in WP:CWW. Also, there was no discussion to split, as is customary ahead of one for television-based articles, so I'm bringing one up now.

Normally, once there are at least two seasons, it may be okay to split the episodes into their own LoE article. I don't know if the total number of episodes makes a difference here, but with only 26 thru two seasons, it may still not be ideal to split. I'd be okay with an episode split, and could try within the next couple of weeks to do so if no objections are posted. MPFitz1968 (talk) 15:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Split performed. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fuller House (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


https://abcnews.go.com/US/hollywood-actors-ceos-charged-nationwide-college-admissions-cheating/story?id=61627873

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/12/entertainment/lori-loughlin-felicity-huffman-indicted-college-admissions/index.html

An Update now one of the cast members of Fuller House Lori Loughlin is now facing allegations for a college cheating scandal named Operation Varsity Blues as of March 2019.

“You calling a source unreliable does not make it so”

Calling something that isn’t a plot hole a plot hole doesn’t make it so. In fact doing so goes against the very definition of the phrase. They explained Michelle’s absence all the way back in episode 1, and the reasoning still applies in season 4--Fradio71 (talk) 06:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel? Spin-off?

I have no problem with either term, nor do I have a problem using both terms in the article (as it currently does). However, "sequel" is used in the lead, the categories, once in the main text, and 3 times in the sources, while "spin-off" is in the main text twice and in the sources 20 times. So, with the weight of that, shouldn't it be "spin-off" in the lead and categories instead? --Musdan77 (talk) 03:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We should be consistent in the article. If the majority of sources, weighted highest towards the ones closest to NETFLIX, call it a spin-off then that is what the article should call it in all instances where this needs a classification. I don't want to get into editor evaluations of the meanings of the terms as everyone will have good reason to call it what they think is correct, so most common usage in sources should be determinative. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Calling it not a sequel at all would still be wrong though--Fradio71 (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly a sequel, not a spin-off. Spin-off usually has just loose connections to main show/movie.--Denniss (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I guess it's inevitable for people give an opinion on which they think is better. I'm not sure what you mean by "ones closest to NETFLIX". Netflix itself doesn't use either one. Of the 3 uses of the terms in the article, only one has a reference at the end of the sentence, and it has "spinoff" in the source (WWD.com). Musdan77 (talk) 02:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant by closest to NETFLIX is to find out what they consider it as being more informative than what some random reviewer calls it unless the reviewers have a consensus opinion. However, given the description in the article, sequel looks a better match than spin-off (media). We could also try to avoid classifying it at all in the article and just go by the descriptions. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending revisions

Why are my revisions under review? What did I do wrong?--Fradio71 (talk) 18:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fradio71: The article is under pending changes protection, which means IP edits can still be made but someone with pending review privileges would need to approve the IP's edit (most readers will not see any changes made by the IP, prior to approval, if they come across the article at this point). An IP edit was made before yours, and because of that IP edit, it remains "pending" until approved by someone with pending review privileges. I just approved the edits made by the IP and you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fuller_House_(TV_series)&oldid=887507180"