Jump to content

User talk:Theroadislong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Janhavisgore (talk | contribs) at 19:33, 3 August 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message .

Q on reference source language

07:53:55, 14 November 2017 review of submission by FriendlyB


Dear Thereodislong,

thank you for reviewing the draft "Dr. Petry Textile Auxiliaries".

For the sources, I cited independent sources, such as - http://www.genios.de/fachzeitschriften/artikel/MTB/20080617/umweltschutz-und-nachhaltigkeit-in-/060817061.html - https://www.biooekonomie-bw.de/de/fachbeitrag/aktuell/insektenchitin-macht-textilherstellung-nachhaltiger/

In order to have more evidence, I added information from further independent sources and references: - https://www.bloomberg.com/profiles/companies/6311207Z:GR-textilchemie-dr-petry-gmbh - https://www.bluesign.com/industry/chemical-suppliers/references/textilchemie-dr-petry

Thank you in advance for re-reviewing.

Thanks for your help!

Thanks for your assistance with Draft:InnoCare. I have included {{connected contributor}} and noted it on your user page that I work for that company. They're not paying me to create this page, I just think it would cool to have a Wikipedia page. Let me know if there's anything else you can suggest to improve my draft. I appreciate your help!

05:44:48, 23 November 2017 review of submission by Lizzybunker

I've added the appropriate citations!

Invacio

Hi Theroadislong I've edited the text - please let me know if it's better this way I appreciate your feedback!

00:53:26, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Cmolaro


I added more 3rd party sources that are verifiable and are independent, professional sources (not personal blogs or sites). I now have 15 citations.

Please let me know what else you think is required to have it accepted?

12:54:53, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Llewol


08:40:08, 28 November 2017 review of submission by Salt&pepper12345


Hi there, thank very much for your care and consideration to to help build this page. I can understand why the review was rejected, as i hadn't cited enough sources on the first draft. I was wondering if you'd mind having a read over the latest draft and checking if it is better now thank you. SP

13:22:45, 4 December 2017 review of submission by 79.106.95.85


21:10:13, 6 December 2017 review of submission by Innocent Cuty


Dear Theroadislong

Hope you are fine and doing good.

I am requesting for a review again as the major comment for rejection/decline of this article was its Reference section or having less references. Now, the draft has been updated, and more than 20 solid references have been employed, with more historical details, and best possible bibliographic support in the light of the available literature. This single page article is now having over 25 appropriate references, and are strengthened with new data.

Your anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Sincere Regards

Dear Theroadislong

Thank you very much for your prompt response.

The objected references (facebook) has been udpated with the departmental URLS (links to the webpages). I think, these were the most up to dated and regularly updating references. Moreover, the last paragraph was deleted, because the book describing the paragraph and the mentioned material is in press (which is written by Dr. Ikram), and once the book got published, the three to four lines paragraph will be inserted again.

I do hope, that the draft will get approved now and will get online, as after coming across other such articles, this one seems to be far better than those.

Your prompt and positive anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Thanking you in anticipation

Sincere Regards

07:43:09, 15 December 2017 review of submission by Kgkg90


23:49:06, 23 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally


The submission's referencing was improved as advised, and I added a few more. More information on his teachings and publications were added. The page exists in 3 other Wikipedia: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell

In-depth coverage

I added RPG Site. Is that a reliable source?

02:14:50, 26 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally


Please see references 15,18,19,21,22

07:39:46, 28 December 2017 review of submission by Nat.johnson


Hi Theroadislong! I have recently uploaded a draft of the article "Admitad" here and you have declined it. Could you kindly explain what can I do to make it right? Is it possible to work with you as my mentor on the draft? Or, maybe, you can help with writing, could you kindly tell me what is the best option? admitad is a global company, it already helps over 630,000 people worldwide. I believe, that it needs to be on Wikipedia.

23:24:44, 4 January 2018 review of submission by Yesterdaysfire


Hi there!

I was just wondering what the issue was with my article submission? I tried to follow all the guidelines. I hope that I can make any revisions that you may require!

edited

Hi there Thanks for your comment. Made the edits per your notes on the page for David A. Hurwitz. GigiH0118

13:36:39, 8 January 2018 review of submission by Tearstosweat


More reliable references like newspaper sources(Times of India, Decaan Chronicle) are added

00:42:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander


Dear Theroadislong,


Thank you for your valuable time and timely reply.


The bellow listed recognition letters and independent press publications may provide a more in-depth coverage regarding different subjects about Carl-W. Röhrig's life and work mentioned in the WIKI article.


I now additionally added the following references to the Citations and References section in the article:


8. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Newspaper Article". DIE WELT - Independent Daily Newspaper for Germany.

9. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". East Grinstead Courier, United Kingdom.

10. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1989). "Recognition Letter". by the National Geographic Society, Washington D.C.

11. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". THE PRESS, Christchurch, New Zealand.

12. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Recognition Letter". by Heinz Sielemann, Munich, Germany.

14. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". BILD Newspaper, Germany.

17. Röhrig, Carl-W. (2003). "Newspaper Article". Fränkischer Tag, Newspaper, Germany.


I am looking forward hearing from you.


Sincerely,

Vliander


Vliander (talk) 00:42:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:27:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander

Dear Theroadislong,


The article was written from a neutral point of view and reliable sources where provided.

The questioned links in regards to Röhrig letters could be removed if required.


Sincerely,

Vliander

Who are u

Who are u to correct me or remove the changes I made to kammara sambhavam.

he (or she) is a VERY experienced Editor and probably saw something wrong with your article. Flintmcneal (talk) 11:13, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:52:05, 6 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by WildBullMiller


Thanks for the info

For the bio, is Nicholas Kaufmann's official website a good enough source? That's where the info comes from, anyway.

Typo in Title

Hi and thanks for approving my post for "Helgesias of Sinope." Unfortunately there's a typo in the title, which should be "Hegesias of Sinope" (no L). My apologies for that (it was my first post). I don't know how to fix a mistake in a title. Are you able to help me? Thank you, Budapest Joe

Re-submitted

Hi Theroadislong.

I have resubmitted the article for a re-review, please let me know if it reads better now? If not, can you give me an example of how to improve it. Thank you, Christian.

Images/Imágenes

Hi! As Images/Imágenes stated I am being paid to edit this page, but I am also working on this program as it is a work in progress. It was on the aire for over 30 years and pulled off in 2011. We are currently working on starting the project again but as this program began in the 70's there is not a large online presence. Is there anyway this page could be published for now, so we can show people that Images/Imágenes is coming back? Thanks, Alice

I have a lot of information from the Executive Producer but since none of it is available online, I cannot reference it. For example: (None of this is available online) Mission Images/Imágenes is a multi- Emmy award-winning television program series that creates, chronicles, and promotes the varied rich diverse history, culture, and life experiences of Hispanic/Latino communities in the state of New Jersey and the nation. Brief Organizational History For 46 years, the Images/Imágenes television series provided a voice and platform for New Jersey's diverse Latino population. The program series is known as the longest-running Latino community program in the history of PBS. Over the decades, the Emmy award winning series featured thought provoking round table discussions, interviews, profiles, documentaries and special topic episodes on the most prevalent issues pertaining to and for the Hispanic/Latino populations – the fastest growing demographic in New Jersey. Program topics ranged from lifestyles, business, education, legal matters, community affairs, pop culture/entertainment, the arts, sports and the health and sciences. Images/Imagenes was launched on January 6, 1972 than titled “Mi Casa Su Casa” on NJPTV hosted by producer, Diego Castellanos. The program made history as the first Latino television series on Public Television in New Jersey to air across the Garden State and surged as the nation’s number one market in New York and the number 4 market in Philadelphia. Since then the series is recognized as a resource for top Latino stories, both at local, as well as the national level. Award Winning Producer William Sánchez is the Producer/Director of Images/Imágenes since 1972, and is currently revitalizing a new series as its producer/director at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. He produced the series with the PBS NJ Television Network until the station was dissolved by the state on June 30, 2011. Within the first ten years Images/Imágenes became the leading contributor of programs for the PBS Series Presente hosted by Rita Moreno. Images/Imágenes competed with mainstream networks and was selected over ABC World News Tonight at the National Unity Awards in St. Louis. Then it rose to the top of the Latino Broadcasting Media when it was highlighted at the San Antonio Film Festival in the 1980s as a must see series on Latin Music alongside the films “LA BAMBA” and “STAND AND DELIVER.” National Recognition

For over 40 years, Images/Imágenes under the leadership of producer William Sanchez the television industry has recognized the series with four Emmys and nominated for twenty by National PBS. The series is distinguished having received numerous national acclaims from the White House, Congress, National PBS, the National Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), and three New Jersey Governors. The series represented PBS in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. It was distributed by the Department of Defense and with audiences including American military bases around the world. It was also national under the Latino Consortium’s series “PRESENTE” with host Rita Moreno. Now under the banner of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Images/Imagenes’ legacy continues for public viewing at the United States Library of Congress. Signature Shows There are a number of evergreen programs that were signature shows for the series and are timeless works of history and culture. A. Sembrando El Futuro/Seeding the Future (5-part Parent Education Series) Nationally acclaimed/ New York Emmy Award Winner 1985 B. The Hispanic Youth Showcase 1999 (Talent competition/motivational program hosted by kids (Ages 5 to 17) was recognized as one of the top six children’s programs in the nation by The Arts Council Co-op/ Mid-Atlantic Emmy Award Winner C. Su Salud Primero/Your Health First with host John Quiñones Mid-Atlantic 2008 Emmy Award Winner, drew national acclaim D. The Spanish Guitar (History/Legends: Jose Feliciano) Mid-Atlantic Emmy Winner 2010


Notable Programs & Specials Include: E. Festival Afro-Caribeño (Afro-Caribbean Festival at Newark’s Symphony Hall 1980) 2,500 people attended concert/first of several Images’ shows to obtain national acclaim F. Word-Up Stop the Violence with Edward Hames Olmos (Actor) 2004 Emmy Nominated Town meeting with 400 teens G. Lainzation of New Jersey, 1982 winner of the national Unity Award held in St. Louis, Ma. Won against ABC’s World News Tonight Other Notable Programs & Specials Include: H. Caribbean Music And Dance Emmy Nominated, Represented PBS At An International Level I. Latin Music Special Emmy Nominated J. The Art of Baseball Emmy Nominated K. Latinos in Boxing (History and Legends) L. History of Flamenco (History and Performance)

The Golden Age of Dance: The Palladium Obtained worldwide download success on the internet in 2009 1983 Special: Alcoholism & Mental health Inspired New Jersey Government offices to establish policies and focus groups aimed at understanding and serving Latinos in need of mental health

Productech Corporation draft reviewing

Dear Thereodislong,

thank you for reviewing the draft of Productech Corporation article. I was trying to do it objective aтв not an advertising, taking an article about JBL as an inspiration. Looks like I failed (( Would you please advise, what parts of the article require editing? thank you in advance!

References added

Hi, I filled up the draft with some useful references and also added some literature. I hope it could be enought. Thanks

Thanks

I want to know that why my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dolmen_Malls not approving any suggestion

Grateful!Gmli82164 (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Gmli82164

Hi! Thank you for the review. I will do what I can to improve that article.

Lorraine McGowen Draft Page

Thank you for the notification. I have removed all external links from the Lorraine McGowen page.

DRAFT:Summation Formula List Decline

Ok, I took your advice and added my material back onto the wiki page on summation. You watch how long it takes D Lazarus to delete it and post his own rambling notes. His notes don't transition well for sentence-to-sentence; paragraph-to-paragraph, nor make any sense; Some of what he posts really is not related to closed form summation. Roger

Dixon Algebra submission.

I have followed your instructions and I think I have successfully updated the references to conform to wiki practices.

Historical notes: • I begsn working on this topic some 40 years ago; • Periodically the algebra has cropped up in the works of others; • Most of this activity has occurred in the last 8 years; • John Baez was the first to call the algebra the Dixon algebra; • This became somewhat solidified when the Quanta Mag and Wired articles appeared; • I recently saw a blog in which the blog's author said there is no wikipedia page for the Dixon algebra yet; • So I decided to start one.

Cheers, Geoffrey Dixon

Great American Doll Company Draft

Hello. Can you please help me edit this wiki page. I have done it the best I can. Can you please tell me what i need to fix up

Thank you for your help....

I really appreciate your help with my draft:Marek Holeček. I will try my best to add those missing citations you pointed out so hopefully it can get better. Thanks again...I really hope the article will be accepted at last ...

autobio

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for your reply - I wasn't aware of restriction on autobiographies, but can well appreciate the reasoning behind it!

all best,

Ketty Nez

Aron Ain Draft

Thank you for reviewing the draft. I'll edit the page to include more sources or remove sections that don't have sources. Thank you!

Ashleylouisewilliams3408

FYI: Ashley has been adding photos to Commons and then inserting those photos into various articles in preparation for her intention to create an article about her grandfather, Virgil Williams. I left a note on her Talk to declare paid or COI if she proceeds with the attempt. (Evidence for intention is creation and then deletion of a draft in her Sandbox.) The quail hunting photo you deleted was there because Virgil owns the land that was name-mentioned in the image caption. David notMD (talk)

Mona Lisa Brookshire

New edits

https://ameyawdebrah.com/mona-lisa-brookshire-blay-miezah-featured-in-upcoming-inspirational-film-becoming-the-keys

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ml4lyfe2 (talk • contribs) 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Can you help me improve my page?

Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel

Hello there,

I have removed unsourced material and thinned it out as per your direction. Can you please cast an eye?

Draft:900 wine prosecco

Hi Theroadislong, thanks for reviewing my page!

I saw your comment on my draft page 900 wine, I'm inserting the Italian wine brand on the market. I'm not connected to the company, I just try to make the list of brands on wikipedia as complete as possible. I am passionate about wine and I think this brand is important in the Italian sparkling wine scene.

can you possibly and kindly advise me of the changes that can better comply with the policies of wikipedia? Thanks a lot!

April editathons at Women in Red

Page deletion tagged

I am definitely not using it as a free hosting service and i am sorry i ll need to disagree with your analysis. its just i am taking time to be up to the required standard of trained wiki editors and i think i ll make it. thank you for taking the time to reviewing my page.

Regards

Shahara Ahmad-Llewellyn

Why can't you just add some things and save as you modify instead of it making you resubmit and publish. Because I have a long way to go and I can't keep getting rejected.

Re-review My Article

Hello Theroadislong,

I have already added new sources like you adviced for my draft article Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF and hope if you could review it again and see if its notable enough for Wikipedia.

Thank you very much Mathew Anderson

Review of submission by Casper da Costa-Luis


Thanks for your review.

As requested, I've removed external links as requested (except for the "See Also" section) and used more neutral language.

Do let me know if anything else needs improving!

Short information about Ukrainian scientist

Hello. Could you please help to create short info page about Ukrainian scientist? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yevgeniy_Zadorin

Milly Bennett review

Hey! Thanks for reviewing the article. I'm very new to this, so I'll try to learn more and go back in to cite third-party sources. Thanks for your help

re-edit is submitted

Hi Theroadislong.

I have re-edited my article submitted on the 19th of April. Will be very thankful if you can have a loot at it in the nearest possible date. Thank you!

M28 Trombonico

hey how can I make my article better or get some exceptions by changing a few things cause I don't really understand what the bot thing wants

Wikipedia page

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for getting back to me so quickly, I take on board what you say and will think again.

Many thanks,

Ian

Australian Biome Project

Thank you for your advice, do I need to add credit or remove the biome reference entirely.````

I have re edited for your comment. could you please take a look and give me some feed back thanks````

Update

Hi, Theroadislong -- thanks for your comment. I have updated the situation with the external links. Sorry for the mistake! Please let me know if anything else needs changing. Thanks!

Thank you

Thank you for the swift review of my article. Best, K

PyCM

Hi

I think Draft:PyCM is good enough to be accepted. This article provides some reliable references like Journal of open source software and Github (the most popular community of software developers) and etc. In comparison with other accepted open-source software articles like Aika_(software), Renjin , UIMA , BigDL, Cantera_(software) that most of them are self-cited. And also this library with more than 640 stars, 200 dependant codes and 1000 installs per week, is more popular than currently available articles on English Wikipedia like ELKI, Cantera_(software), OpenNN. Any suggestion is gratefully welcomed to improve this draft.

Thank you for your consideration.

Request for Dispute Resolution

Apologies for not notifying you on your talk page. I thought notification on the related talk page was appropriate initially, but see that I need to notify everyone individually.

Jorgen Odegard decline

Hey Theroadislong!

Hope all is well. I happen to notice a decline for Jorgen Odegard’s wiki page which is totally okay because I’m very new to creating wiki pages. My goal is to improve and help songwriters and producers’ lifes with publishing & management company by creating sources of all their music credit and praises as this is one of the most useful tools publishing companies use to determine their qualifications for sessions, pub deals, and so much more! Also as you mentioned, the information on the producer is lacking and scattered all over the internet, which is why this wiki page is super important for a lot of these producers and songwriters.

That being said, would love your thoughts and suggestions that’ll help this process. To give you an idea, I used Sarah Aarons as a reference who’s another songwriter with a similar amount of credibility as jorgen in this industry. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Aarons Again, would love your input! Thanks so much

Jorgen odegard decline

Hey Theroadislong!

Hope all is well. I happen to notice a decline for Jorgen Odegard’s wiki page which is totally okay because I’m very new to creating wiki pages. My goal is to improve and help songwriters and producers’ lifes with publishing & management company by creating sources of all their music credit and praises as this is one of the most useful tools publishing companies use to determine their qualifications for sessions, pub deals, and so much more! Also as you mentioned, the information on the producer is lacking and scattered all over the internet, which is why this wiki page is super important for a lot of these producers and songwriters.

That being said, would love your thoughts and suggestions that’ll help this process. To give you an idea, I used Sarah Aarons as a reference who’s another songwriter with a similar amount of credibility as jorgen in this industry. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Aarons Again, would love your input! Thanks so much

A Star

The Teamwork Barnstar
Great work on the article. We cannot save them all, but we can do our best to research the topic and show notability. Lightburst (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly this one didn't end well. Theroadislong (talk) 16:06, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advice?

Hi there,

Thank you for reviewing my submission, The Fine Art Group.

I would really appreciate it if you could give me some further advice on how to get my page published - I thought I had enough third-party sources (Bloomberg, Antiques Trade Gazette, The Art Newspaper, Christie's), but apparently it still does not have enough notability. Getting this page up and running is proving to be a lot more difficult than I first thought, so any help that you could give would be amazing.

Thank you in advance for taking the time to read this, and for reviewing my article!

Sophie 15:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intern1FAG (talk • contribs)

Christies in this instance is not a secondary source, the rest seem to be press releases, and the whole draft reads in a promotional manner I would strongly suggest you tell your employer that it is not going to get an article published very easily, conflict of interest editing is very much discouraged. Theroadislong (talk) 16:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Blatant Advertising"

How is this "blatant advertising," everything in here comes from a third party source and is stating FACTS so that the reader can get to know what Arbor Investments is. This is exactly what an encyclopedia article is supposed to look like. This is also written exactly in the same format as any other private equity firm or investment firm's page on Wikipedia. Visit any other PE firms page and you can see for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprassas4 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cprassas4 "Arbor has built successful, diversified portfolio companies" "Fund IV will continue the same successful investment strategy" "investments in reasonably valued, high quality middle market food and beverage companies" are all marketing trumpery and the portfolio section is a list of external links which we don't use in article space. Theroadislong (talk) 15:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

I appreciate it, this is my first Wikipedia article so I did not know that tone was frowned upon (I now completely understand why). Thank you for the help! I will be sure to fix that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprassas4 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprassas4 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong Can you take a look at my changes when you have time and let me know if the article's tone is better — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprassas4 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Fails WP:BAND - 19:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Added album release information. Thank you for the review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tech23420 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Sanfine Hospital /decline

Hi! Yes, I did not have time today to put the references and I need to read more on how to set up the references template. I want to do it the correct way. I will be adding them soon. I have them all in a word document, primary and secondary sources. I am aware that I should not rely too heavily on primary sources or else the page will have that warning. I will also clean up the page more. I wish that Wikipedia had a way to just upload the draft and then later submit, so that is why I pressed publish.

Thank you Edit2: Ive made many new edits and I am starting to get the hang of this! Thanks again for getting to my article creation so quickly! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wnkwdy (talk • contribs) 13:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Publishing the Article

If the sources and information is suitable in wikipedia then please publish the article named - Aashish Kaushik asap thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Subhsankalp (talk • contribs) 04:46, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft Draft:Aashish Kaushik has no reliable sources so will not be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 06:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anstalin Page Article Suggestion

Hi Mr. Theroadislong I Know The recent famous social worker and very good software Engineer Why u not accepted the article i dont know to Make the article you just search google and write about them . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merlin Dizzy (talk • contribs) 12:33, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Ex Articles :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriesi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Sawyer


So pls created the articles about Anstalin Pls support me i will collect all other details and i will share you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merlin Dizzy (talk • contribs) 12:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merlin Dizzy Your draft Draft:Anslin has no reliable in depth sources, Linked in, Facebook and Instagram are not suitable references. Theroadislong (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Raymond J. Chambers

Dear reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our submission. My co-authors and I have taken your comments on our initial submission to heart and we have revised the material accordingly. We have doubled the number of citations and provided more wiki links and resources as to Chambers' importance to our discipline of accounting. We note in particular that Chambers was inducted into the Accounting Hall of Fame, which is the highest honor that an academic accountant can achieve, and that he was also inducted into the Order of Australia, which represents the highest level of achievement for an Australian person.

Please do let us know if you would like us to make further edits and we'll do accordingly.

With very best wishes,

Dr. Martin E. Persson, MSc, PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Accountancy 396 Wohlers Hall, 1206 S. Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820 217.300.8547 | mpersson@illinois.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.E.Persson (talk • contribs) 20:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IoAAS Draft Article

Excuse me bothering you again, Theroadislong. I wonder by chance if you might have overlooked my last request for you to have a look at some revisions to this draft? I posted this comment on your Talk Page on 9th July, and there wasn't a reponse, which is quite unusual, as you are super efficient! I guessed you were just away somewhere. You next commented on another post on 16th July, but I think hadn't picked up on mine? Anyway, it's about 10 posts back, if you have a chance to look at it. Many thanks. ArchaicW (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft Draft:Institute of Advanced Architectural Studies has not been submitted for review, but it's looking good to me, you need to remove any in line external links and tidy up some of the bare url sources first. Theroadislong (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IoAAS Draft

Thanks very much. I'll attend to the points you've mentioned, then put the Draft up for Review. I'll let you know when I have done that. Many thanks ArchaicW (talk) 13:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

on declining

Hello Theroadislong

I put up the link in the sandbox for review as it was removed as an external link from an article by considering as vandalism without an review. Since given a chance by teahouse I would like to know what would you considered in article as link vandalism by definition. Rbtcpn (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC) rbtcpn[reply]

WP:AFC is for drafting articles not for reviewing spam links, sorry. Theroadislong (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

re-adding

Hello Theroadislong

I have followed all the correct measurement needed to add/update and editing. I am also discussing through talk about potential overstepping any in-appropriation. my so called vandalism is just a mere unverified misunderstanding and have no bases of any classification match to be contradict of any guidelines. If no verification of in-appropriation would pointed out by remover I would certainly consider it to the subject matter.

Thank You. Rbtcpn (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC) rbtcpn.[reply]

Article about Anstalin

Hi Theroadislong are you search in google Anstalin Google verify and approve but you told there is no refernce Why you are telling link that Pls search in Draft the name i keep Anslin because unable to move live in same Sandbox name thats only I f u need details and refernce i will share u U create Article name about Anstalin . R u ready to do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merlin Dizzy (talk • contribs) 05:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rubim Reibhsa

Hi can u help me about this I cant creat the fan page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubim Rebisha (talk • contribs) 08:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aid writing Wikipedia Article

Good Afternoon! I am an intern at CompactCath Inc, and I have been tasked with creating a wikipedia page, as the company lacks one. This is my first time writing and publishing a wikipedia page, so I am obviously not as skilled with applying all necessary guidelines into my post the first time around. I understand you (or another editor) commented that the post was too similar to a catalog (I am assuming this is due to the listing of products and "defining features") I am trying to figure out how to neutrally write about the company, as well as find sources that are strong and not as centered from the company's website and its distributors. However, the company website and distributors' information is the most accurate and credible representation of what I write in the article. I was wondering if you would be able to inform me on how to neutrally discuss my company, as well as how to include sources that qualify with submission standards despite additional reliable sources being limited.

I highly appreciate your time! Thank you! Jake.compactcath (talk) 21:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jake.compactcath You have been given a thankless task and I do not envy you, creating an article is one of the most difficult things to do on Wikipedia, creating one when you have a conflict of interest is doubly difficult. Wikipedia has no interest in what the articles subject wants to say about itself, only what independent reliable sources have reported. The article should be limited to a summary of what such independent sources have said about the company. Theroadislong (talk) 21:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

4000 Years of civilization

Dear Wikipedian Theroadislong,

There is a long time that I am busy and I forgot a quite lot of Wikipedia regulations. I just read my old written family's documents relating to 4000 years of civilization and I edited it with sufficient supporting references in my sandbox trying to explain why people could called 4000 years with concrete figures of calculation. I would need to receive your simple and easy-understood guideline.

Thank you in advance and forgive me for any previous inconvience caused.

Đào Việt Cường--vietcuongdao (talk) 09:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:BAND - Draft:Gasoline_Lollipops

Do the following not make the criteria?
National music service awarded: "Pandora Radio named the GasPops (as fans call the band) Colorado's Buzziest Band.[2]"
Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles #4 - "The band annually performs in San Pedro, Belize as a part of a local music festival.[3][4]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gasoline_Lollipops#Discography - four albums recorded via independent record label

"Colorado's Buzziest Band" isn't an award though is it? and performing in Belize confers no notability? Feel free to re-submit and let another reviewer take a look. Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IoAAS Draft put up for Review

Dear Theroadislong

Have put the Draft IoAAS article up for Review, as per my last comment to yourself. Have edited the references you referred to and also External Links - hope these now seem better ordered and OK, or just need minor adjustment. Again, many thanks for your help - hope the article is accepted ArchaicW (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

dinnerladies

I thought it would be appropriate to have it in lower case as that is how it was produced. There is a discussion on the talk page about it. HappyTeaTIme (talk) 15:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HappyTeaTIme Ah I see! feel free to revert. Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Deletion of Page

Hey there and good evening. I wanted to share with you with kindness and by being polite if prominent people can enable to have their own Wikipedia article public and live, then whats the problem of me not having my article public as it took my hours and hours to write up the article and I can confidently say that I've started to gain experience, but I want my article as of user: GS.Uppal350 immediately restored my friend and I want to request for an automatic unblock of my page or just restoring it.

I'm also aware that celebrities and other prominent people around the universe can get their article displayed in public, then what's stopping me from getting my article out in public? Also, I will reassure you that some of the video links that are part of the references are my own creation and I just cited it from my YouTube account.

Thanks

Kind Regards Gursh

I am not an admin so cannot restore your deleted page. In order to have a Wikipedia article you need to be notable Notability is judged by looking at the depth of coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources containing significant coverage. Some degree of regional, statewide, national, or international media coverage is also required. YouTube is never a reliable source for anything let alone establishing your notability. Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019 at Women in Red

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131


Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Spiceheads

I am phisically disabled and have learning disabilitys. Somone fixed tha citations for me and said that they felt it was a good first article, I just do not understand what is wrong and what you mean with "Not seeing enough in-depth coverage in the sources". The main sorce is a recognised published story from a reputable place, also Spicehads gets mentioned in the Sunday Times article. As for the others, Spiceheads sells, vidoes and pix to Deadline news, who then sell them to National newspapers and the videos used in the citations are interlectual property of Richard Williamd the founder of Spiceheads.

Please tell me what I have to do to put this right, Spiceheads page and website are very populour with thousands of visitors everyday. Just typing Spiceheads in to Google Serch, or bing, brings up the facebook page, twitter page and website, in the first three hit's, so this to mey thinking indecates that they are notable.

I'm sorry my spelling and grammer is so bad and appeal to you to help me to get this sorted and the article published, as Spiceheads is a page that has helped meany thousands of others to overcome addiction and educated millions through it's help and support.

Many thanks Howard.

Your sources are not sufficient to establish the notability of the Facebook page. Notability is judged by looking at the depth of coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources.


In Citation one is a story by Vice which is all about Facebook Spice Heads and it's sister page Spiceheads

In citation two, The Facebook page is mentioned in the next to last paragraph: "A Facebook page, spiceheads, started by a Blackpool resident, posts footage of users high on the drug."

In Citation 3 I accept that the others do not, but as ecxplained the videos were supplied to them, in any ecvent I will delete them and try again

Waston-Marlow Fluid Technology Group page

Hi - thank you for your message - the Spirax -Sarco page links to a book that documents the history of the company rather than just the companies website. Does this satisfy the remit? Kind regards

Spirax-Sarco releasing a book on their history would still be a primary source and doesn't help establish any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 11:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Karmaveer Chakra Award

Hi Theroadislong,

"Coveted", I mentioned badly. Corrected.

Many Thanks,

Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 13:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lill Roughley

I added the content again (which you previously removed) but this time with a source. HappyTeaTIme (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You added no source for her family details which is what I removed again. Theroadislong (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the detail again, with a supplementary source. HappyTeaTIme (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is very difficult to find reliable sources for all of the detail. Most articles Wikipedia articles don't have reliable sources for every single detail, particularly those referring to living persons. Most of those details remain visible however, hence users tending to continue to add such material, in essence only doing exactly what has already been done from the outset. HappyTeaTIme (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BLP any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing. The fact that other poorly sourced articles exist is not an excuse, see other crap exists. Theroadislong (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CancerLinQ

Hello, your words 'Their own website, blogs and press releases are not suitable sources'. I believe you are mistaken here because first of all not all the press is from ascopubs and second those publications on ascopubs are written by doctors in the name of the American Asociation of Oncology they might not be fully independent from CancerLinQ but they are the most reliable source. Or do you believe the American Asociation of Oncology publications are lies? they have many years researching, collecting information and contributing with medicine for you to discard their work and call them unreliable. I also source Forbes and the national medical journal. I had been waiting weeks for a review...

CancerLinQ LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ASCO so their press releases are NOT independent sources. The Forbes article is not reliable either it is user contributed. You can get other opinions here Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Translation from Russian to English the article about The LitRes company

Hello! Can you please help me with the article translation from Russian to English? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_LitRes_company Will appreciate any help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashashko (talk • contribs) 10:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IARA awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:IARA_Awards First time created article heart broken could you improve this article and publish it please.--Andoster (talk) 15:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IARA awards uk

i have not copied or pasted any information from their website i have purely used reliable please check it for your notice--Andoster (talk) 16:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked here [4] which finds that 65.5% of the content is copied. Theroadislong (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, My first article was rejected by you citing reason, as it failed in wikipedia notability terms. I understood that. But today you have added a 'paid' tag in the article. I don't understand what is that? Can you please explain and as next step (after adding reliable source) how can i re-submit my article?

Because you said here [5] that "the sources which i provided is purely independent and no where related to our company." Which implies that you are working for the company and hence a paid editor. Theroadislong (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for the reply. So, because of the mention "our company' article was put under paid editior. What next i have to do to remove that tag? Also, how i can go ahead for re-submission. Is this tag anywhere block my further edition and submission. Please help

Sarah M. Broom

Thanks for your review. I have added a number of citations, from major national and international media, highlighting the significant and growing reputation of this writer, who has a book forthcoming with a major publisher and has written for prominent journals including the New Yorker and the New York Times Magazine. I hope you will agree that such a writer is noteworthy; if not, I would be grateful to know what would, in your opinion, qualify.

It's looking much better, though the commercial Amazon link could go, it is of no use for establishing notability. Theroadislong (talk) 21:10, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks so much for your feedback. I’ve worked hard on this and I appreciate your noting that it’s looking much better. But you also declined it again! Is there something I can fix? Thank you.

I have not declined it again, you haven't re-submitted it. Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, still learning over here, clearly. Thanks so much for your reply. Have just (actually) resubmitted!

Request on 20:00:22, 2 August 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by GaryHollfelder


Hello,

I would like to post our company FabSoft profile on your site. I tried to model after some of our partners like Xerox. Is there a format I should follow to get our company listed?

Thanks,

Gary Hollfelder

GaryHollfelder (talk) 20:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GaryHollfelder Wikipedia doesn't host profiles, it has articles about notable topics that have been reported on in depth by multiple, independent reliable sources. Press releases and blogs are not reliable sources. Also as you have a conflict of interest you need to declare this on your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

Dear Theroadislong !

You wrote about sketch my article “Circle Launcher and Space keeper”:

This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

(talk) 12:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

This article is same the many articles in WIKI on this topic (Non-Rocket), for example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_ring ,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_fountain ,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_loop .

Why they are not contrary to purpose of Wikipedia, but my is contrary?

Please, give some detail example of contrary.

Thank you advance.

Averev (talk) 22:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Than you for being (most likely) the best Wiki-man!

Thank you so much! you've been the most helpful person EVER on this website! (except for Oshwah). You gave me a TON of help and you are one of the people who make Wikipedia what it is! Flintmcneal (talk) 11:11, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Anglia Ruskin University notable alumni

Re: Anglia Ruskin University (edit) Revision as of 15:38, 2 August 2019 263 BYTES ADDED, 1 DAY AGO Reverted good faith edits by Melroross (talk): Seems notable has own article please discuss on talk page before removing again (TW)

See also: Category:Alumni of Anglia Ruskin University

————————————————

~~ Placing this terrorist’s name right at the top of this or any university defies all logic and looks biased. I have reverted this in good faith and sadly other users keep on reverting. If such a sinister reference must be kept on Wikipedia because it had a newspaper article, the least an Administrator should do is to reorder this whole list of ‘notables’ in some logical manner- date, alphabetically or by notability (not always quantifiable)? Thank you ~~ Melroross (talk) 18:40, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He is notable in Wikipedia terms. Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive‍—‌even exceedingly so. Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia. SeeWP:NOTCENSORED. The list is already alphabetical. Theroadislong (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ganesh Gargote

are these links reliable https://www.rediff.com/movies/2008/jun/30slide4.htm http://www.muhurtnews.com/ganeshgargote https://mr.wikipedia.org/wiki/गोळाबेरीज_(चित्रपट) https://www.loksatta.com/manoranjan-news/padmavati-movie-controversy-censor-board-sanjay-leela-bhansali-1591166/ https://marathimovieworld.com/moviedetail/odh.php https://marathimovieworld.com/?s=Ganesh+Gargote https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/the-marathi-screen-beckons/story-op8GnO853HkrjC9mWjV6NK.html https://maharashtratimes.indiatimes.com/editorial/samwad/marathi-cinema-promotion/articleshow/49118713.cms

it was done by mistake

  1. ^ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/story-behind-failed-bombings-and-airport-attack-1144230.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&oldid=909193589"