User talk:Ugbedeg

Welcome!

Hello, Ugbedeg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Ugbedeg, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ugbedeg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Ehiguese (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the provided sources either:

1) Come from unreliable sources 2) Are press releases 3) Are primary interviews 4) Only mention the subject in passing or as part of WP:ROUTINE coverage.

We need to see independent, reliable coverage of the subject. It's the quality of the sources not the quantity WP:BOMBARD

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Ehiguese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Ehiguese, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jolly Nyame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibrahim Kuta, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages People's Democratic Party and Mina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ugbedeg (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ugbedeg (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Ehiguese (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

adv,bio

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Ehiguese and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Ehiguese, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ugbedeg! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Section edit links disabled, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ugbedeg. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ugbedeg. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ugbedeg! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Autoblock, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ugbedeg! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I get new page reviewer role, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerian Academy of Education moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nigerian Academy of Education, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 15:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But instead of swiftly moving it to draft space you should have flagged it for under sourced issues so that it can be discussed and appropriate steps taken to add more sources. The sources cited in the article are to me, credible sources and there are at least four of them which also satisfies the guidelines that a new article must have at least three credible sources. Thank you. Ugbedeg (talk) 16:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

I see you recently accepted a pending change to January 12 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. All new additions without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 22:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for drawing my attention to this. I have learn and I will try to avoid such mistakes in my future edits. Ugbedeg (talk) 10:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Hello there! Please consider considering the spam element of pending changes which include addition/modification of external links in an article, such as this one. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:11, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. And thank you for the correction. Ugbedeg (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nigerian Academy of Education (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nigerian Academy of Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nigerian Academy of Education, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ugbedeg

Thank you for creating Delta Central Senatorial District.

User:Nnadigoodluck, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating, more of the same.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 16:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nnadigoodluck: Thanks for your commendation Ugbedeg (talk) 16:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted pending change

I reverted your approval of these changes to Captain America: The First Avenger because they changed figures and removed a reference without any explanation. It's a change that had previously been rejected, and the IP's been altering figures for other films. Let me know if you have questions. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You did similar with this edit. The change was to replace a hyphen (-) with an en-dash (–). You claimed they were the same when they were not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the correction. I didn't notice the difference between the two but I'll pay close attention to them in subsequent edits. Ugbedeg (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When there's really no difference between two revisions, the screen will look something like this; the individual revisions aren't shown, and usually there's no option to reject the change. DannyS712 bot IV is set up to review revisions without changes; you can see more examples in its review log. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 03:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ugbedeg. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Tracking your AfD votes and CSD/PROD Nominations

Hi there.

Further to this discussion on Rosguill's talk page, I thought you might find this tool useful for monitoring your or other editors' AfD performance.

And, as I suggested to you at the Teahouse yesterday, don't forget to create your CSD and PROD log pages by activating Twinkle and changing it in Twinkle's preference settings page (they will then appear as sub-pages of your userpage (like this). Finally, do try to avoid coming over as being in a great hurry to gain new editor rights. Demonstrating competence is far more important here than demonstrating enthusiasm. All the best, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:17, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, objectively speaking I do think you have created decent articles so far & definitely have a clue but like Nick Moyes already stated it seems as though you are rushing things a little almost as though you were making up for lost time asides that your efforts thus far are decent and your precocious talents are very much noticed. Keep it up. Celestina007 (talk) 13:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

well said. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ugbedeg! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, CSD/PROD, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clement Nwankwo

Hi - Thank you for creating the article on Nwanko, it's great to see an entry for him as he's clearly notable. I've been copy-editing the article - in the form I reviewed, it read far too much like a professional resumé rather than an entry in an encyclopedia. I also removed material sourced to the BLERF website, this is effectively a self-published source since the website asks for people to send in their CVs. --Goldsztajn (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ID Africa

The article ID Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HandsomeBoy (talk) 20:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clement Nwankwo

The article Clement Nwankwo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject of article is undoubtedly mentioned in reliable sources but those sources seem to rely extensively on the publications or speech of the subject. I can’t seem to find at least three independent reliable sources discussing the subject with significant coverage. Being an executive director of an organization doesn’t automatically confer notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Celestina007 (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the article is truly notable and a Wikipedia entry in his name exists in another language. You can check that out. The subject is the spokesperson for a coalition of over 70 civil society organisations. Do a Google search and you will find that he is truly notable. Unless you are saying that all the media coverage of him should be a biography that discusses only him. Ugbedeg (talk) 14:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance for the submission

Please can you help me to submit this Draft: Abdullahi Dauda Belel I tried to submit it but I couldn't find the place to submit it. Abbas Kwarbai (talk) 07:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbas Kwarbai see WP:AFC or just move the article to mainspace by yourself. Celestina007 (talk) 18:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Abbas Kwarbai, the article has been submitted and now waiting for review. You can continue improving the article waiting for review. Ugbedeg (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]