Jump to content

User talk:Lights and freedom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:640:4000:3170:5140:3029:f28:d38c (talk) at 21:17, 21 August 2020 (→‎Proposed Deletion of Peggy Siegal: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page was last edited or modified by 2601:640:4000:3170:5140:3029:F28:D38C (talk) on Friday 21:17:40 August 21, 2020 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Science Fair (movie) (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
IMDB is not an reliable source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirl (Wanna chat?) 00:58, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Naddruf! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirl (Wanna chat?) 00:58, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Castro Valley High School. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your recent edit is in violation of WP:BURDEN. Provide sources for their attendance or do not re-add them. It isn't complicated. John from Idegon (talk) 17:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Science Fair (documentary) has been accepted

Science Fair (documentary), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:21, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert, California, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Townships, landings, and railway stations

You might be interested in lurking at User talk:Drmies#Former townships of Alameda county. Uncle G (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Del Norte Unified School District moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Del Norte Unified School District, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 01:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "List of Cranbrook School, Sydney Alumni CUTPASTE move". Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you can clarify why you felt a WP:CUTPASTE move was better than simply WP:MOVE. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Things appear to have been sorted out thanks to Premeditated Chaos. The copy-paste move was undone and the page was then moved to List of Cranbrook School, Sydney alumni. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Mistake.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 16:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Del Norte Unified School District (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:
Sourcing needs improvement. Please use NCES for stats. Add T:Infobox school district. Charter schools are part of school district? Provide a source for the schools list. I'll guarantee you there is no school anywhere named "Sunset High". Everything in this article requires sources. Except for mundane indisputable stuff like the name of the superintendent and the names of the schools, those sources need to be independent of the school district.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
John from Idegon (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Del Norte Unified School District has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Del Norte Unified School District. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 09:28, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @DGG. My concern with the NCES source was that the demographic figures are very different. In particular the Native American percentage is 7% in NCES, compared to 14% in cde.ca.gov.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Del Norte Unified School District has been accepted

Del Norte Unified School District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kincade Fire has been accepted

Kincade Fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested on my changes to the Illegal Immigration in the United States page

@Naddruf: If you agree or disagree with my changes to the History section of the page, please say so on the Talk page. Thank you! Edit5001 (talk) 02:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"List of lists that don't include themselves" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of lists that don't include themselves. Since you had some involvement with the List of lists that don't include themselves redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. NineFiveSeven 17:50, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lefty's has been accepted

Lefty's, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"8-5" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 8-5. Since you had some involvement with the 8-5 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Lefty's

Hello, Naddruf,

Thank you for creating Lefty's.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Reviewed as a part of new article curation. IMO meets the letter but not the intent of wp:gng so I am passing it but leaving a notability tags so that this may be discussed by others

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

North8000 (talk) 12:58, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Naddruf! You created a thread called Introducing quotes with "As ... said" at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Transgender non-binary people

Please stop moving people to this category just because they're non-binary. Not all non-binary people specifically identify as transgender, and "I think it's silly" is not a valid reason to controversially mass-move pages. I hate to get involved in controversial topics, but I had to revert these changes since I saw you already made them to multiple pages. If you're going to mass-edit pages like this, I'd suggest making sure there's a consensus in favor before making the changes. And right now, there appears to be a consensus developing against these changes, for precisely this reason. Ionmars10 (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its good if there's a consensus against it. Before there wasn't a consensus at all. That solves the problem.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 21:44, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

—

Oleg Mishukov

Hi. Please STOP adding unsourced information to this article. Please see WP:BLP, WP:BLPREMOVE and WP:CITE. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 19:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Lugnuts: Stop reverting me for no reason. Just read the reference.

Honours - European Championships

Place Discipline Mark Wind Place Date

2. 4x400 Metres Relay 3:01.34 München (GER) 11 AUG 2002

.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 19:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Naddruf! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Sourcing history articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dazel Jules moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dazel Jules, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia), especially in articles about living people. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 20:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KirbanzoWould you consider it acceptable if I add the sports-reference link in the references section?—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 20:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Kirbanzo: That would be two references. There's one already. t —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 20:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My Place in the Universe blanked

All right, I've blanked the page and put {{Db-g7}}. This draft has to be deleted, because Diannaa told me 2 years ago that Wikipedia is not a place to collect made-up stuff. Animal Control Abuse (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that seems like a good thing to do.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 07:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Naddruf! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Revert, Block, Ignore, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nate McMurray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aleksandr Ladeyshchikov

Hello, Naddruf,

Thank you for creating Aleksandr Ladeyshchikov.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:18, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nate McMurray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion of Peggy Siegal

Proposed deletion of Peggy Siegal

Notice

The article Peggy Siegal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Attack page, not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2601:640:4000:3170:5140:3029:F28:D38C (talk) 21:17, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lights_and_freedom&oldid=974237428"