Talk:André Carson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:50, 30 March 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the André Carson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

U.S. Congress C‑class High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

United States: Indiana C‑class Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance).

Islam C‑class Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American C‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Excessively promotional

A lot of Carson's policies are described with almost campaignesque descriptions. If this is a quote from his platform, it should be clearly marked as such. Else, this should be cleaned up with more neutral, encyclopedic language. Pseudo(Avicenna) (talk) 02:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NPV: Tenure section is one-sided (negative)

This section should be retitled, "Things André Carson said that made white people uncomfortable." A section pertaining to the tenure of a 15-year incumbent should give a sense of their overall career: their priorities, achievements, setbacks, etc. This section merely lists two accusations of racism that Carson made:

1) His having said that he heard racial slurs hurled at Congressman John Lewis in 2010 and

2) His anti-Tea Party remarks invoking lynching

The first is deprecated by saying that "Although audio and video recordings of the protest have been posted online, no proof of the racial slurs has yet been provided, and the reward remains unclaimed."

1) Recordings of a crowd might easily have missed slurs that Rep. Carson heard.

2) Why, when a Black person claims to have heard a slur, must white people insist on "proof." This, in itself, is bias.

3) The source for the deprecating statement is the very biased Washington Times.

4) The link doesn't even work any more.

5) What reward? There's no prior mention explaining that a reward was offered or by whom.

Regarding the second, racism within the Tea Party movement is well documented, and while the Congressman's rhetoric was called out in the pages of the Washington Post by the liberal columnist Jonathan Capehart for being excessive^[1], it's not as if nooses never turn up at right-wing rallies, is it? I'm not saying that Rep. Carson's rhetoric was justified, just that the piling on in this section of the Wiki article is excessive. Perhaps it should be retitled "Controversies" and rewritten with a NPV and less biased sources, but right now, it is simply evidence of White fragility. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ Capehart, Jonathan (6 September 2011). "Andre Carson was wrong to invoke lynching". Washington Post. Retrieved 30 March 2023.

[1] Capehart, Jonathan (6 September 2011). "Andre Carson was wrong to invoke lynching". Washington Post. Retrieved 30 March 2023.

[1]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 A lot of Carson's policies are described with almost campaignesque descriptions. If this is a quote from his platform, it should be clearly marked as such. Else, this should be cleaned up with more neutral, encyclopedic language. [[User:Pseudo(Avicenna)|Pseudo(Avicenna)]] ([[User talk:Pseudo(Avicenna)|talk]]) 02:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
+== NPV: Tenure section is one-sided (negative) ==
+This section should be retitled, "Things André Carson said that made white people uncomfortable." A section pertaining to the '''tenure''' of a 15-year incumbent should give a sense of their overall career: their priorities, achievements, setbacks, etc. This section merely lists two accusations of racism that Carson made:
+:1) His having said that he heard racial slurs hurled at Congressman John Lewis in 2010 and
+:2) His anti-Tea Party remarks invoking lynching
+The first is deprecated by saying that "Although audio and video recordings of the protest have been posted online, no proof of the racial slurs has yet been provided, and the reward remains unclaimed."
+:1) Recordings of a crowd might easily have missed slurs that Rep. Carson heard.
+:2) Why, when a Black person claims to have heard a slur, must white people insist on "proof." This, in itself, is bias.
+:3) The source for the deprecating statement is the very biased Washington Times.
+:4) The link doesn't even work any more.
+:5) What reward? There's no prior mention explaining that a reward was offered or by whom.
+Regarding the second, racism within the Tea Party movement is well documented, and while the Congressman's rhetoric was called out in the pages of the Washington Post by the liberal columnist [[Jonathan Capehart]] for being excessive<ref>{{cite news |last1=Capehart |first1=Jonathan |title=Andre Carson was wrong to invoke lynching |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/andre-carson-was-wrong-to-invoke-lynching/2011/03/04/gIQADrMJ6J_blog.html |access-date=30 March 2023 |publisher=Washington Post |date=6 September 2011}}</ref>, it's not as if nooses never turn up at right-wing rallies, is it? I'm not saying that Rep. Carson's rhetoric was justified, just that the piling on in this section of the Wiki article is excessive. Perhaps it should be retitled "Controversies" and rewritten with a NPV and less biased sources, but right now, it is simply evidence of [[White fragility]].
+[[User:A.T.S. in Texas|A.T.S. in Texas]] ([[User talk:A.T.S. in Texas|talk]]) 00:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)