User talk:Nsaa

Please stop reverting my contribs in "Georgia"

Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.245.186.56 (talk • contribs) 2008-08-11T18:45:43 (UTC)

The article Georgia (U.S. state) is about the United States of America state named Georgia, not the country Georgia_(country). Please the material there as I already have stated at your discussion page. Nsaa (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

No Problem

It's okay. Thanks!--Master of Pies (talk) 22:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Reverting

Hi. Just thought you should know that here you reintroduced vandalism that an anonymous user had removed and warned them for it. Thanks -- Gurch (talk) 22:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Ahh... I'm really embarrassed. This was a really stupid edit by me. Nsaa (talk) 22:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Ricky K

I'm a bit confused on this edit to Ricky K. I'm not seeing how the main editor requested deletion. Care to enlighten me?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

My fault. I've used the wrong db-template. Nsaa (talk) 22:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Just glad to know I'm not completely losing it! :) --Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Greece August 2008 newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Yannismarou (talk) 10:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

stop vandalizing Leander Paes article

In 2008 he has won the MIXED DOUBLES not the MEN's DOUBLES so stop putting 2008 as a win on the biotable, section "doubles". Next time i'm reporting you for 3RR+vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.57.196.206 (talk) 20:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Please don't remove content (my first revert) and don't use language like "FUCKING RETARDS, IN 2008 HE HAS WON THE MIXED DOUBLES NOT MEN'S DOUBLES, THIS SECTIONS IS MEN'S DOUBLES" (my second revert, and I won't do it again even given your language in the following revert comment). Nsaa (talk) 21:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I didn't remove any content, that was not my edit dumbass. Check it. 62.57.196.206 (talk) 03:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

You're correct that my first revert was not your IP (62.57.196.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)), but the second and last revert was reverting your language (not proper for most people). Why did you indicate that I've going to break {{Uw-3rr}}? Nsaa (talk) 07:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Because you reverted my edit 2 times in a row. One more and you could've been reported for the 3RR rule. 62.57.196.206 (talk) 11:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I've only reverted you (ip 62.57.196.206 once). See the articles history. Although I've removed bad language ("FUCKING RETARDS") in a comment afterward (but not reverted you). Nsaa (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

True, I was also wrong. So excuse me. 62.57.196.206 (talk) 21:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Hayleyjubilee's articles

Nsaa, please be a little more cautious when labelling a brand-new user a vandal. While the contributions of Hayleyjubilee (talk · contribs) may not be of much long term use to the project, labelling this user a vandal certainly does not assume good faith. While certainly COI and notability problems were there, I don't believe that any of this was bad faith vandalism. Before winding up on AIV, someone should have taken this editor aside and explained the COI and notability policies and explained why they shouldn't arbitrarily remove maintenance templates from articles.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, caknuck _° is geared up for football season 19:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Aggree. He should have got a {{welcome}} message in the first place, so it would have been easier for him to read about some basic principles. Nsaa (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Tried to handle a similar case in a better way. Nsaa (talk) 20:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Much better. Having done it myself before, I know it's easy to fire off a template or two when on Recent Changes patrol, especially when using Twinkle or similar add-ons. Admins fall into that trap too, issuing indef blocks in short order to new accounts making goofy edits. Let me know if I can help with anything else. caknuck _° is geared up for football season 22:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanx a lot for advice. I will post on your talk page (Questions arises all the time, so it's nice to have someone to ask :-). Nsaa (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm at your disposal. Cheers, caknuck _° is geared up for football season 23:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Moreton Pinkney article

Hi! Hope you don't mind me bothering you with a fairly trivial question! I'm pretty new (or at least.... pretty sporadic in my edits!). I made a few changes to the entry for Moreton Pinkney the other day. I notice that you, and a user (IP only) have made some subsequent edits. I'm trying to understand the revision history. As far as I can see, a lot of spurious content has gone back into the (tiny!) article. It's got a few spelling errors, and unverifiable content. It looks to me like someone is deliberately messing with the piece, but I am a real novice at this. I'd appreciate it if you could have a quick look at it for me and translate what is going on. Was I right to remove the spurious content on 3rd Sept, and replace it with a little (accurate!) information or should I have left it? I don't want to start an editing war - but I don't quite understand the edits which have been done since I last looked at the article. Thanks for your help! --Jothelibrarian (talk) 22:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

There's seems to be some Wikipedia:vandalism to the page. I tried to revert but didn't remove enought (as you pinpoints). The current article looks quite ok? You can see all the edits done by going to the page history and compare each edit. You can also make a earlier version the current one by pressing the date/time in the history listing on the edition you want to make as the current. don't be affraid of doing edits and revert Vandalism. Just be aware of the Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule. If someone adds material that is not verified you can alwasy add the citation needed template {{fact}}. Nsaa (talk) 22:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Your cleanup on 3 september looks fine to me! Nsaa (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, and for checking my work. Another kindly Wikipedian removed the vandalism shortly after I posted to your talk page. I'll keep an eye on the article, and try and add some more (useful!) content. I'm also curious to see if the same user keeps adding nonsense to the entry. The whole vandalising-the-wikipedia thing baffles me frankly, can't see why anyone would want to do it! Anyway, thanks again for your help. --Jothelibrarian (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Amanda

Having taken a quick look about it would appear that the IP's definition is better than what was there. Amanda at Wiktionary gives the same meaning as do several websites. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 23:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes You're correct on that. My last revert was a mistake. Nsaa (talk) 14:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Simple Green

Please do not revert back the changes I have made to the Simple Green article. As an employee I know exactly what ingredients are and are not in the formula. Earlier attempts of monitoring this article and trying to play fair and unbiased have only allowed more blatant ingredient lies - including one time by a competitors company. Since this is a Simple Green article I am not going to address the false statement about the current VOC policy of the California Air Resource Boards with regards to trigger spray bottles. If you have any further questions, you can direct them to me. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunraven (talk • contribs) 2008-09-10T16:05:23 (UTC)

In the Simple Green you removed the {{reflist}}. I will not edit do more edits on the artiole, but try to back up the article with good third party sources, see WP:CITE#CHALLENGED Nsaa (talk) 14:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the direction, I will do as you suggest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunraven (talk • contribs) 16:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Gotta Kick It Up!

I have left a message for the editor on their talk page. A good way to approach this is that if they have not responded to prompts in the edit summaries, then try to engage them on their talk page or the article talk page (a better choice for anons using more than one IP address). Typically, getting into an edit war over maintenance tags is regarded as silly, so if it goes back-and-forth more than once or twice, it's best to take a step back and try a new approach, such as getting a third opinion in the matter. (Asking a neutral admin/experienced editor is a good idea.) I hope this helps. caknuck _° is geared up for football season 20:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my comments about calthorpe park school"

These comments about participation about the recent channel four show are true and i know this because i have talked to some members of Calthorpe school — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisbranchtree (talk • contribs) 2008-09-12T16:29:35 (UTC)

I've done reverts on Calthorpe Park School because {{Advert|section}} was removed. Please do not remove this without discussing it in a comment or on the articles talk page. It would also be nice if you add references to the section. Nsaa (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Inflation

Please be more careful. Your edits here looked like vandalism, but you probably just feel asleep on your keyboard or something. lk (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Ohhh ... that was my worst edit ever (hopefully). Thanks for notifying me and reverting it. (I was probably on my way on reverting this one [1]) Nsaa (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

SHINY!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For beating me too many times to count at reverting vandalism. Thanks for your work! Remember to Be Bold! -- RandorXeus 19:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanx! Nsaa (talk) 19:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

for the timely revert to my talkpage :) Karenjc 19:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

for this Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 18:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Personal Attack by Interwebz

Hello, I can't alter your comments, but pleas consider changeing the warning on User talk:Interwebz to : {{subst:uw-npa2}} ~~~~ instead of a level one vandalism warning, as the subject of the warning was not good faith, and it was a personal attack, cheers Theterribletwins1111 (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Aggree. Changed it. Thanx for notifying me :-) Nsaa (talk) 16:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. No problem Theterribletwins1111 (talk) 16:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

malaysia airlines terminated destinations list format

That is wikipedia approved format for lsiting terminated detsinations, it was approved after concensus amongst all editors so airline articles could have a uniform style in apperaence.203.81.205.132 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I made a rollback of my edit. Sorry. Nsaa (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Change Made to Category of page "User:JD3K/MaRy" wasn't vandalism

The change that i made to the category, was after i read the page, finding that good part of the facts on it aren't anything but a hodge-podge of copy and paste, false facts and unrelated data. The page in question should be removed, as only it drives to confusion, or put as an example of hoax Wiki page. --Neopillan (talk) 15:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

You gave no reason for saying that this is a hoax and this was my reason for reverting it. Please use the discussion page and ground your claims (I can't do it because I'm not familiar with the subject). And since it's on a users userpage (maybe he is working on someting), please ask him. Nsaa (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Done it. check my reply and you will understand. Thanks for hearing me.--Neopillan (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Raila Odinga

Since it is obvious that there are too different opinions in the interpretation of the guidelines, I filed a dispute at WP:BLPN#Raila Odinga. --R.Schuster (talk) 14:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Great! I also asked people watching the Obama-page for help resolving this. Nsaa (talk) 15:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Hustadvika

Good job adding the source (I've removed the tag), just to let you know you can remove those tags yourself (even as the article's creator) if they're no longer accurate. Happy editing, Guest9999 (talk) 21:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I want to be carefully when I'm myself the main editor, since I then misses the distance. Thanx! Nsaa (talk) 21:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair City

The explanation I supplied clearly stated "Shortened the section for the purpose of neutrality". Indeed the criticism section appeared to take up a disproportionate amount of the article. Sioraf (talk) 19:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, my fault. Looked like removal of a lot of content. Reverted/[2] myself. Nsaa (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Rob Banzai (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Xinunus

Your not an admin stop reverting this users personal page. You changed it without making a comment. If you have a problem with what this user is doing make a note of it for the user to change it back themselves, its not your place to do it for them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.207.27.25 (talk • contribs) 2008-10-03T03:28:45 (UTC)

I've not reverted the user page user:Xinunus according to the page history, although you have done so prob. incorrectly. I've only reverted removal of content on this user’s discussion page. As far as I can see you have emptying the discussion page incorrectly. Nsaa (talk) 07:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Gotcha

Sorry, that tower annoys me however, Rhodes brought shame to Ohio, and so does that tower. It is a spit in the face of us Ohioans.--65.25.16.174 (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't know the particular subject, but saying it's a shame is quite exeptional. But a building is named after a person to honour him. Exeptional solid reference(s) needs to be added if you want to change this I belive. Nsaa (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I understand it was vandalism, and I am sure it would be reverted. But for your own information, Rhodes ordered the national guard to Kent State the day of the Kent State Massacre, resulting in four deaths and a number of injuries. Honorable? I think not --65.25.16.174 (talk) 22:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank You!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your assistance in keeping USS New Jersey (BB-62) vandal free while the article was up on the mainpage I herby award you The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 00:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

for this! Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing problem with vandalism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papa_Dee

I had no idea what to do except continuing reverting the vandalism, hoping some automatic feature would raise an alarm.

Nisken (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Feels encouraging that I have not misunderstood the BLP rules totally. However it does not help - ehausler have now vandalised Your notes as well, what to do? Nisken (talk) 07:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I've reverted the removal action and gave Ehausler another vandalism (WP:VAN) warning (on the grounds that he removes well sourced material without any explanation). If he revert once more he will be given a final warning {{subst:uw-vandalism4|Papa Dee}}, and if this action occurs yet another time, then he will be reported (WP:AIV) so an administrator can block him for a given period of time. If multiple users starts vandalizing you can ask for a page protection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection (WP:RFPP). Nsaa (talk) 09:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

I've now reported Ehausler at WP:AIV and the user was blocked indef. Nsaa (talk) 12:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for this. It's much appreciated.

Peace! SWik78 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

that was a perfectly fair respose to what you did, all i did was ask a few questions.

i feel like you are on some sort of power trip, i think that it is out of order. i you have any integrity you will discuss this with me as aposed to just blocking me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weeze01 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

First of all I didn't block you. Even if I was an admin on en-wp I wouldn't have done it since it was me you attacked. If I've been an admin and seen this kind of attack on other users you would have been given the same reaction from me (per WP:ATTACK). Nsaa (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

There Will Be Blood

Nsaa apparently you've never seen http://www.hulu.com/watch/10232/saturday-night-live-milkshakes If that doesn't belong in the Parody section of the There Will Be Blood article then Wikipedia is really F***ed up. Don't assume everything is vandalism, jesus.71.32.72.91 (talk) 22:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for giving me the reason! I restored it and added the above link as an reference. Nsaa (talk) 11:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom of Laighin

If the author of the article blanks the whole thing, that is considered a request for deletion and not vandalism (see G7 criterion for speedy deletion). I have appropriately tagged the article under G7 as a result. Cheers, MuZemike (talk) 03:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

ACC Tool

Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. Also, if it was you who created the request, you may also wish to the subscribe to the mailing list, which is used for internal discussions between the account creation team. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it was me requesting it. Nsaa (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, for applying to access the ACC tool I (a tool administrator) have decided to give you access. You may now access the tool here. However before you do so please read the tool's guide due to the nature of the tool. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and joining the mailing list Please bear in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and that misuse may result in your access being suspended by a Tool Administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions, and once again welcome to the ACC tool.

Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Stop messing with the CMU rugby football club page unless you belong to the club.

Stop editing that page - unless you are CMU rugger - in which case wtf are you doing deleteng the roster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddevilz 14 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm... I indicated in my edit summary that I was not 100 % sure, but for me it still not looks like something we should include. Nsaa (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

That whole page looks as if it is unformatted junk and test edits. I will prod it. T^heDJA^tC^lubR^ock :-) ^(T/C) 22:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)10:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you so much for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I checked, and I had reverted some vandalism by that same editor earlier that day. Thank you. Please take this Barnstar with my warmest gratitude. TopGearFreak Talk 20:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)