User talk:Bruce Campbell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bruce Campbell (talk | contribs) at 01:02, 28 December 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


The Scorpion

Hey, I created an article for The Scorpion. You seem to be good at putting a lot of substance and citations into articles, so I figured I'd give you a heads up. Have a great day! --L1A1 FAL (talk) 04:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Megadeth-Die-Dead-Enough-302836.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Megadeth-Die-Dead-Enough-302836.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Symphony of Destruction

Excellent work on Symphony of Destruction page. :)

Hook in Mouth

Hey, I just did some edit work (grammar cleanup, spelling, repeated items, etc) on 'Hook in Mouth', and I noticed that there was no cover for it. Because it was listed as a single, I went to look for it, but the images that came up were for the 'Mary Jane/Hook in Mouth' single. So, just to let you know, you might want to check for some sources that can establish if it is just a B-Side or a single in its own right. Great work so far though! Keep it up!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 00:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checked over Rust in Peace

I just checked over Rust in Peace, found a couple typos. Only other thing I can think of that you might want to check on is in the 'Writing & recording' section, you have a quote of Dave Mustaine talking about the title, and there are quotes within quotes there. Now, I think that the format for that is "example 'example' example" with single quotes for quotes within quotes, but I could be wrong, and because of that, I didn't want to do anything there. Other than that, looks good to me.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 01:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Aronofsky

Hi Bruce,

I really appreciate the work you've done on Darren Aronofsky's page. I don't mean to undo your work or give the impression that I'm obsessed with little niggling things. I think you make a lot of valuable contributions to the page. When I made corrections or appended portions of the article, you can rest assured it was purely based on fact, not opinion. For this round, I noticed you made innocent changes in integrating Fox Searchlight into timeline breaks. While this is a convenient way to format, it's slightly misleading.

For instance, having Fox Searchlight as the sole production company, while a clean and convenient way to break up the information, doesn't give credit to the other production companies who have also funded the same films. For instance, Black Swan was only funded in part by Fox Searchlight. It was also funded by Cross Creek Pictures. And so it seems unfair that you broke it up into sections like that. I think the section breaks shouldn't necessarily be about who funded his films, it should be about the films themselves in the timeline of his career. Anyway, again, sincerely wanted to thank you for your contributions to the page.

--Fellinivsbergan (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fellinivsbergman (talk • contribs) 04:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Bruce. You're doing some terrific work at Darren Aronofsky, with the expanded lead and well-cited early life sections in particular. Your sections on his films, which seems like a lengthy, ongoing process for you, are also very good. I would say that, in fact, that the bulk of these sections would be very appropriate to have in the bluelinked main articles for these films themselves. Once a "main article" link goes in, and you've rightly inserted here, the sections here per guidelines only need to be a brief, even single-paragraph summary. Before you expend more effort on created lengthy sections in this article for individual films, I thought another editor should bring this up. If there's any help I can offer, please do ask. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Just a couple of technical points, easily corrected. We can't say things like "currently" or "recently", etc., due to WP:DATED, which disallows undated references; that's why you'll see things like "As of 2010" in a lot of articles. Also, watch out for conversational tone; we used last names only after first full-name mention. Hope this helps! --Tenebrae (talk) 03:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you've chosen not to discuss policy/guidelines-violation issues at Darren Aronofsky, including the fannish, non-encyclopedic tone of referring to "Darren" as if he is a personal acquaintance, which begs the question of WP:COI. The overly laudatory phrasing throughout makes this article read more promotionally than encyclopedically. Also, the detailed discussions of individual films down to their Rotten Tomatoes ratings more properly belongs in the individual films' own articles. Likewise, there are images and other media here that are solely about the films, such as special effects in The Fountain. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Endgame (album)

The article Endgame (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Endgame (album) for things which need to be addressed. Novice7 | Talk 05:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Add {{done-t}}, if you have fixed an issue. I can know that you've fixed an issue and move on to the next, if you do so :) Novice7 | Talk 08:26, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Bruce Campbell (talk) 19:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More comments at the GA page. Novice7 | Talk 04:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you undo all the corrections? Novice7 | Talk 04:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have failed it for now. You can ask for reassessment, if you feel this is a mistake. Thank you. Novice7 | Talk 04:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hitmixes

Thanks for your review of Hitmixes! Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GAN review

Would you be interested in reviewing the article Fear of a Black Planet for GAN? Dan56 (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Ryanndon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ryanndon.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kanyedarkfantasy.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kanyedarkfantasy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:294068092.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:294068092.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thank Me Later

Thanks for the message, but you should try with the article's other contributors. The others probably had more to do with writing/composing most of the article than I did. Dan56 (talk) 00:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Album ratings template

Would you like to add your opinion to an ongoing discussion regarding the Template:Album ratings? It concerns the number of reviews/scores included in the template and whether or not to keep in the template the reviews with no ratings given, termed "(un)favorable", "mixed", "positive", etc. Dan56 (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lostintheworld.ogg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lostintheworld.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gorgeous.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gorgeous.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:24, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kedarkfantasy.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kedarkfantasy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Throne

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Otis (song)

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

After doing some edits on List of accolades received by Black Swan, I think it meets the FL criteria and would love if you, User:Aquila89 (the list's top contributing editor) and me could nominate it together at FLC =). Crystal Clear x3 09:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! After some more edits to the noms chart, I've submitted it at FLC: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Black Swan/archive1 Crystal Clear x3 05:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kedarkfantasy.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kedarkfantasy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Kanye West proposal

Hello. I'm proposing a WikiProject Kanye West at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Kanye West. Would you mind taking the time to vote there? Put your name in the Support section if you think he deserves one.

Kanyewest1123 (talk) 09:06, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Liftoff.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Liftoff.ogg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UKChartPlus

Hi Bruce. I saw this edit... and i have a question... do u have a link to conffirmed that information? Or a photo o something... I really need something that proves that info. Plis, is to es:Scheiße.--NicolásTM (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I really need something to proves the peak of the song (#136)... they blocked me in es-wikipedia following a reference problem... Just need something about the peak in the Top 200.--NicolásTM (talk) 18:15, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely for that reference is the problem... Because there's no link or something to proves the peak. Sorry for the inconvenience.--NicolásTM (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Walks

Any reason why you removed your post on my talk page? I mean, I would've placed it at GAN if someone could help me with the dead links. GamerPro64 17:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, you can help out with the article. It would be nice if I get another person to help out with turning it into a Good Article. GamerPro64 18:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well no. I don't think its a good idea to remove some of the chart information just yet. I was told that you would need a Bilboards account to look through the archives. Do you have one? GamerPro64 18:56, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, when I clicked on the link, I got 404'd. GamerPro64 19:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, instead of relying on Billboard, we should find other countries charts, like the ones I found at The Emancipation of Mimi. GamerPro64 19:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, those ideas don't work. I still say we look at other countries charts, like one I found in Australia. link. GamerPro64 20:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I checked out the source and it says [[1]] that its a bad source to use when making a Good or Featured article. GamerPro64 20:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Good to see you around again. Thanks for the compliment! Getting Thirteen to GA status is the ultimate goal, but it's not ready just yet. I'm figuring about 2 more weeks until all the charting positions come out and then I might put it up for nomination. If you want to help out with it though, you're more than welcome to. Like I said though, the only topic matter really missing is just chart positions and sales, etc. I want to improve the wording a little and get reviews from Blabbermouth.net and Brave Words & Bloody Knuckles too though.

Anyway, welcome back to the fold!--L1A1 FAL (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know I'm on the right track with the refs. I tried to nominate Endgame for GA again a few months back and the refs were one of the things that I pretty much got shot to hell over.
I kind of feel the same way about the lead. I have been tweaking it, but leads really aren't my strong point. I just try to copy the format from other GAs. If I could get away with it, I'd prefer to just leave the song section in the same format it is in, but that will have to be worked out I guess. I originally had no interest in adding audio samples, but since you brought it up, if you wanna upload a sample of "Public Enemy No. 1" or "Sudden Death" that would be a good addition (you'd have to do that though, haven't done audio uploads on here).
I was just gonna work on it as an 'in-progress' deal until I got the chart positions, so within about 2 weeks I would say if all goes well, this could be on it's way to a review.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I'm concerned, you have free reign on Lulu. I actually bailed out of the that article a few days ago. I tried to get semi-protection on it due to unhelpful IP edits, but that was being ignored, and I got tired of removing "The Table" from Hetfield's musical credits. If you want, I can re-add it to my watchlist and start doing stuff on there again. I agree though about the lead, as I recall, it wasn't much more than a couple of sentences and a composition section would be a very good idea on that one as, like you said, that's the center of the controversy there.
Admittedly, I added a number of those reviews, but it's probably a good idea to cut the number down a bit - however you want to do it.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 19:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice job on the lead there. Only issue I noticed was a misplaced comma. Nice touch adding the sample, though it would probably fit better aligned on the right. Nice job compressing the reviews, as well - less of them there, but still gives a decent idea of percentage of good to bad reviews--L1A1 FAL (talk) 21:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy

Template:My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. | helpdןǝɥ | 04:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take Care talk page

Would you mind adding your two cents to Talk:Take_Care#Downtempo? Another editor insists on removing a genre that is sourced, asserting it is not a genre, and putting the burden on me to prove it is. Dan56 (talk) 06:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. A comprimise was reached. Dan56 (talk) 02:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gorgeous.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gorgeous.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:27, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kedarkfantasy.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kedarkfantasy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dark Fantasy (song)

The article Dark Fantasy (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Dark Fantasy (song) for things which need to be addressed. Puffin Let's talk! 16:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New GA!

Congratulations!
Well done for all the work you did on Dark Fantasy (song) which is now a certified GA! Keep up the good work! Puffin Let's talk! 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Nostalgia Ultra

Whatever's best for the article. The EP content isn't vital information anyway. Dan56 (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bruce_Campbell&oldid=468004134"