User talk:IdahoPolitics: Difference between revisions
→Frank L. VanderSloot: new section |
|||
Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
Sock or not, that content was simply not appropriate. It seems an awful lot like you're trying to turn local publicity events into philanthrophy, which I'm sure would sit well with Melaleuca but does not jive with NPOV. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC) |
Sock or not, that content was simply not appropriate. It seems an awful lot like you're trying to turn local publicity events into philanthrophy, which I'm sure would sit well with Melaleuca but does not jive with NPOV. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 20:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
Couldnt be farther from the truth. I don't have any affiliation with VanderSloot and personal disagree with his politics. I see VanderSloot page for two things to talk about his company Melaleuca since it doesn't have one and of course Mr. VanderSloot himself. I am up for a discussion on Vandersloot Talk page for philanthrophy by him/his company and take it one event at a time instead of just getting rid of all of it at once. ( I do agree that some of it sounds fluffy but could be rewritten). [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] would you mind starting the discussion on the talk page? I seem to be blocked due to reasons Im still trying to figure out. Thanks [[User:IdahoPolitics|IdahoPolitics]] ([[User talk:IdahoPolitics#top|talk]]) 22:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:12, 29 June 2017
Welcome!
|
IdahoSolo, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi IdahoSolo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Idaho Legislative District 33 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to John Alexander and Jeff Thompson
- Eric Anderson (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to John Campbell
- Heather Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Eric Anderson
Will Grigg
Thanks for updating his page. I'm still in shock. Zongalt (talk) 23:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Same here, died too young. IdahoSolo (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikiproject!
Hello, IdahoSolo! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Ron McMurray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Resume for minor politician.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 01:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Ron McMurray for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron McMurray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron McMurray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melinda Smyser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Yates (Idaho), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bush-Cheney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tommy Ahlquist (June 28)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tommy Ahlquist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Sock or not, that content was simply not appropriate. It seems an awful lot like you're trying to turn local publicity events into philanthrophy, which I'm sure would sit well with Melaleuca but does not jive with NPOV. Drmies (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Couldnt be farther from the truth. I don't have any affiliation with VanderSloot and personal disagree with his politics. I see VanderSloot page for two things to talk about his company Melaleuca since it doesn't have one and of course Mr. VanderSloot himself. I am up for a discussion on Vandersloot Talk page for philanthrophy by him/his company and take it one event at a time instead of just getting rid of all of it at once. ( I do agree that some of it sounds fluffy but could be rewritten). Drmies would you mind starting the discussion on the talk page? I seem to be blocked due to reasons Im still trying to figure out. Thanks IdahoPolitics (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)