User talk:Skäpperöd

Welcome! You can navigate through earlier posts on this page via this page's history. Add a new section I will respond here.

Contents

DYK for Swedish Wars on Bremen

On December 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Swedish Wars on Bremen, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Gustavia, Rügen

On December 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gustavia, Rügen, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Vorpommern

Mea culpa. Lfh (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Could you check the stress at Saarbrücken too? It was placed on two syllables, so I removed the second, but maybe I should have removed the first. Lfh (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Expulsion of Germans after World War II

I have soft-protected Expulsion of Germans after World War II to allow for more discussion on the talk page before further large changes are made to the article. This allows for established users to edit the page, but not anonymous IPs, so that this does not become an edit war. Cheers --BaronLarf 19:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Relax

I did not call anybody a Neo-Nazi. You have no cause for complaint.--Woogie10w (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Ok, why keep him there? The mention of the IHR stinks like a dead fish in the sun.--Woogie10w (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Note well my earlier comments The current article is poorly written and sorely needs a lot of cleanup work. Over the years this article has become a hodgepodge of edits by editors who acted in good faith but unfortunately lack historical expertise. Overall my POV is sympathetic to the plight of the German civilian population who became the victims of the expulsions. The historical facts need to be narrated in a credible scholarly article rather than the current disjointed, poorly written mess that exists at this time--Woogie10w (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

The article is your baby, let me read the The New Cambridge Medieval History[1]--Woogie10w (talk) 23:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Happy Skäpperöd's Day!

User:Skäpperöd has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Skäpperöd's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Skäpperöd! Peace, Rlevse 00:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC) A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Humph! He completely misled me with his photos of unblemished hollyhocks. Shameful. Novickas (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! You made my snowed-in day! Skäpperöd (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Brotbackautomat.

Wir haben frisches Brot, Schnee oder kein Schnee. Wir Haben ein Brotbackautomat. [2]--Woogie10w (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Ecktes Brot

Weizenmehl-2 tassen(US)

Vollkornweizenmehl-1/4 tasse (US)

Roggenmehl-1/4 tasse (US)

Milchpulver- 1 tablespoon (15 milliliters)

Olivenöl 1 tablespoon (15 milliliters)

Salz-1 teaspoon (5 milliliters)

brauner Zucker-2 tablespoons (30 milliliters)

Wasser-1 tasse (US)

Backhefe-1 teaspoon 5 (milliliters)

backen vier Stunden--Woogie10w (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Resolved

Malik Shabazz undid his action.

Tylman AfD

Your editorial comments are unhelpful, unnecessary, and serve no purpose other than to create a hostile atmosphere. If User:Paweł5586 should not have commented, let the blocking admin remove his comment. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop trying to turn this AfD into a battleground. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

(response)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK for Peace of Travendal

On January 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peace of Travendal, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

History of Poland

There are missing references because I haven't finished this big "Decline of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" section yet. I get most of the development from the "Historia Polski 1505-1764" book by Gierowski, it's listed there, an old Jagiellonian University text. Then I check some other sources, add information, do references. This process is basically complete as far as I'm concerned up to the "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" portion, so any corrections, additions, additional references would be best to put into this "finished" part. This current "Decline" part it is probably best to leave till I'm done with it. Other that that I appreciate contributions and involvement. For example I rarely add internet references, which I suppose should become increasingly available as the network encompasses more and more things. Thank for your interest and constructive input. Orczar (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Tylman AfD

I'm relieved to hear you didn't take offense. Looking back, I realized that I made my comment right after you, and I used the word "you". Thanks. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Siege of Stralsund (1711–1715)

On January 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Stralsund (1711–1715), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Siege of Tönning

On January 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Tönning, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Poznań

Hi Skapperod, I would appreciate if you would stop POV pushing on Polish cities. Thank you.  Dr. Loosmark  22:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

?Skäpperöd (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

You know very well what I mean. I request you give us a quote of the relevant text from the source on the article's talk page.  Dr. Loosmark  00:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

[3] Skäpperöd (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

How does "Also in Poland and Bohemia were the burghers in the towns initially primarily of German origin" support your claim that the "German settlers constituted the majority in Polish towns of that time"!? Please remove your nonsensical claim.  Dr. Loosmark  12:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Maybe my translation is slightly ambiguous (though I don't think so), but I had also quoted the original. "Überwiegend", which I translated as "primarily", means primarily in the sense of constituting a majority, but "primarily of German origin" and "German majority" are imho redundant anyways. Please also avoid aggressive terms like "POV pushing" and "nonsensical claim" when talking to me. Skäpperöd (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Initially (soon after the Mongol invasion - at a single point in time) primarily of German origin is quite different from "constituted a majority of Polish towns at that time". Please stop pushing your POV.  Dr. Loosmark  18:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

No, "initially" refers to the Ostsiedlung = founding period of these towns, I wonder why you associate the Mongols with that quote? Sure that was the same time period, and there was a feedback-loop on Ostsiedlung, but that was primarily in Lesser Poland and Silesia. Anyhow, the paragraph from which the quote is derived does not mention the Mongols, it deals exclusively with the founding of towns during the Ostsiedlung. I am sorry to see that you won't tone down your aggressive language. Skäpperöd (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Two things 1) These towns = which towns? 2) What exactly is meant by "founding period"? I hope you are not claiming that these towns had a German majority at the time where they were founded. PS please don't make bogus accusations of aggressive language.  Dr. Loosmark  10:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The Cambridge History of Poland Vol 1 supports Skäpperöd's POV--Woogie10w (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Arbeiterbewegung in Pommern

Maybe you are interested in this [4] [5]. Viele Grüße HerkusMonte (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I just skimmed through it and will look at it more closely as time permits. Skäpperöd (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thx

Thanks for improving my articles. My writting english is not good but I am trying my best (Meost (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC))

Wikiout

WuhWuzDat 17:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

RSOE EDIS

Hi Skäpperöd. I see you noticed my decline of your speedy tagging on RSOE EDIS - I would have notified you but you got there first. After looking over the article a bit in the process of trying to find sources I decided it qualifies as unambiguous promotion and deleted it anyway. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lorenz Schwietz

On February 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lorenz Schwietz, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of German-Japanese relations

Hi there. Over the past weeks I majorly expanded the article on German-Japanese relations and really need people to go scan my contributions. I want to set a high quality standard since I'd love to have it featured some day. I'd really appreciate your participation on its nomination for a Good Article at Talk:German–Japanese relations. Thanks in advance! --Gliese876 (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

I think I've dealt with every missing citation ;) --Gliese876 (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Europa regina

On February 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Europa regina, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

• I have never seen, heard of, or imagined this before. Thanks very much for bringing this article to Wikipedia! --Griseum (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome. Allegories of Europe are not well covered on wikipedia yet, except for the Greek myth (but not its Early Modern adaptations, as far as I am aware). If you are interested, take a look at this map, where Europa regina actually left the map and becomes pure allegory, as an Europa triumphans. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hoop crown

On February 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hoop crown, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Capitulation of Estonia and Livonia

On February 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Capitulation of Estonia and Livonia, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Königsberg (1656)

On February 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Königsberg (1656), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Labiau

On February 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Labiau, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Polish Requiem

Thank you for helping me translate on the DYK nomination for Polish Requiem. I try to keep Sunday offline, smile. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

1. Proposal to Close This RfC
2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

New message

Hello, Skäpperöd. You have new messages at Mootros's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New message

Hello, Skäpperöd. You have new messages at Mootros's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Treaty of Bromberg

On February 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Bromberg, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Das Erbe

On February 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Das Erbe, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

RfC

There is a request for comment happening here: Talk:Evangelische_Kirche_in_Deutschland#Recent_move

Perhaps you'd like to give your opinion on the matter. Mootros (talk) 20:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Peace of Lund

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peace of Lund, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

EKD

I just wonder why you put a hypen for the Hanover and former Thuringian EKD church. --Mk4711 (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I just copied the names from the EKD site, and they have a hyphen there. The German name of these two churches is also spelled with a hyphen. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 06:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Narva

On March 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Narva, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Warsaw (1705)

On March 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Warsaw (1705), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Municipality Treptower Deep

Hi. Can I ask You for the source of List of municipalities in the Province of Pomerania, A-H? Thank You JDavid (talk) 17:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

these lists I took from de.wiki, sources are any pre-1945 atlas compared to a post-1945 atlas I guess. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Altranstädt (1706)

On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Altranstädt (1706), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Thorn (1709)

On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Thorn (1709), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Second Northern War

Do you consider nominating Second Northern War for the WP:GAC. I think it has all the chances becoming good article.M.K. (talk) 19:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, but I don't think it is ready for GA yet. Though Frost is a good source, the article needs more sources and cross-references. Furthermore, I only gave a major outline ofthe war's course, and several issues are missing. Eg

• the establishment of the "most absolute absolutism ever" in Denmark as a consequence of the war, precedent for similar events in Sweden two decades later;
• the issue of Scania and adjacent provinces, for which the dices finally fell in favor of Sweden (change of conciousness in the population? Snapphaner? Demography? Feudal land ownership? Dano-Swedish transition in the Lund church province? etc pp);
• demography in PL-LIT, eg population drop, Catholic/victim identity in Poland, the legendary atrocities against Jews and other non-Catholic minorities in Poland following the Polish recovery, consequences of Ashkenazi permanent resettlement in Western Europe and return of Jews who fled to Germany following their post-war rehabilitation by the Polish king etc pp;
• the role of the Maritime Powers and (most important) France in negotiating and guaranting the peace;
• in this context also: the Sound and its international importance, Denmark's crisis and role as an unattractive ally, that she was ignored in the peace to a degree that only its imminent annihilation was prevented, consequences for Holstein-Gottorp's orientation towards Sweden;
• transformation of Brandenburg-Prussia from a minor European player to a medium power with the foundations laid to become the dominant power in northern Central Europe;
• the beginning transformation and internal disputes in Russia - why the tsardom despite its manpower and initial gains was exhausted so soon that its role in respect to Sweden was indecisive, maybe an excursus to the cossack situation/boyars/tartars, the envisioned and failed Polish succession;
• transformation of PL-LIT from a potent player in EE to anarchist booty grounds;
• devastation of Prussia, Pomerania, Poland - bellum se ipsum alet vs scorched earth
• short characterization of the fighting armies - composition? pay? trained? leadership? loyalty? etc pp.
• Lithuanian-Polish relations - pro-commonwealth and separatist attitudes of which Lithuanian nobles/families, formation, characterization and dissolution of the Swedish-Lithuanian union
• characterization of the most important leaders besides the kings, eg Magnus de la Gardie;
• Partial reduktioner in Sweden, impact of the war (or the envisioned booty) on the acceptance of this measure by the nobles, net benefit reduktion/war costs for Karl X Gustaf and Karl XI and impact on the latters full-scale reduktion lateron.
• The concept of the dominium maris baltici, importance/net benefit of fortifications at the mouths of the important rivers/hinterland holdings, the respective rivalries between the big players, stance of the locals

At least, those are the issues that I still miss and there are probably more. The other "Northern Wars" articles are also not in a satisfactory state, the worst atm being imho the Livonian War article which I have not yet expanded. What I did during the last months is creating some kind of a basic coverage of the most important wars and treaties (and some battles I have interest in, though I like treaties more), and frankly that is (and will be) very time consuming already as I try to not write from memory, but only from cited sources. So I can't promise you that the issues above will be adressed in the near future. Another handicap regarding GA/FA status is my unfamiliarity with (and to some degree dislike for) the respective MOS requirements and the corresponding wiki bureaucracy, and I kind of lack the motivation to get into that. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 10:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, the most of those improvements are for the WP:FA status. I think GA would sail with this edition with few improvements suggested by reviewer. M.K. (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Hm, you seem to have more experience than me (zero) with GAC, so if you really think it will pass, why not give it a try. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I will nominate it. Few quick tips - it is not good then one sentence makes a single paragraph, plus bullets should be converted to smth (for example a table; with treaties case). M.K. (talk) 22:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Skäpperöd (talk) 06:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

• Article is nominated, but it might take few months until a review shows up. M.K. (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

• Article is already GA. Congratulations ! M.K. (talk) 06:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for putting this forward. Skäpperöd (talk) 07:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Altranstädt (1707)

On March 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Altranstädt (1707), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 00:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kartouwe

On March 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kartouwe, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hitler Youth Quex

Hello! Your submission of Hitler Youth Quex at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Response is here. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Excellent. Please could you repeat the hook in the article header, with online citation using the same link? When you've done that, please let me know and I'll give the nom a green tick. But please note that this is my first week of DYK reviewing (my response to the reviewing backlog), and I've requested an administrator to check my work. Hope that's OK.--Storye book (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I did, but I am also fine with being AGF'ed ;) Best Skäpperöd (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Review updated.--Storye book (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Re

I do not know what you mean by giving this diff. Who clarified me what? Which policies are you talking about? Could you please provide any links? Thank you.Biophys (talk) 18:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out, of course it was here. Skäpperöd (talk) 06:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I saw and understand what you mean. Being "proxy" or "meatpuppet" means doing something exactly as someone else asked you. I did not do that. I made only such changes (with my corrections) I would like to make myself. In a number cases I did not even touch an article because I disagreed with all changes he suggested.Biophys (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I also had to respond to your other accusations instead of doing my work. Why are you doing this? We never had any disputes with you, I never mentioned you in emails, and I voted on your side because I happened to disagree with Piotrus. I do not vote like Piotrus just because he is my friend, just as I do not make all changes like Hanzo just because he is my friend.Biophys (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I responded here. Skäpperöd (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hitler Youth Quex

On March 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hitler Youth Quex, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Siege of Wesenberg (1574)

On March 20, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Wesenberg (1574), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks a lot, too much honour. HerkusMonte (talk) 16:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Battles of Wenden (1577–1578)

On March 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battles of Wenden (1577–1578), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Treaty of Vilnius (1561)

Hello! Your submission of Treaty of Vilnius (1561) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Responded here: typo. Best Skäpperöd (talk) 14:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for interventions and improvements at Jan Dzierzon

It's so much better now. Which he deserves, a pretty subjective assessment based on I like his face. Best, Novickas (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome! Though there still is ample room for improvements... Skäpperöd (talk) 08:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Pozvol

On March 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Pozvol, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Novgorod (1557)

On March 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Novgorod (1557), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 04:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Vilnius (1561)

On March 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Vilnius (1561), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Elbing

On April 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treaty of Elbing, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Brandenburg-Prussia

On April 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brandenburg-Prussia, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2010 (UTC)