User talk:Vivek.bekhabar
Welcome to Wikipedia
Hi, I'm Oiyarbepsy and I can see fairies.
Welcome and thank you for joining and editing Wikipedia. Unfortunately, we can't allow you to write articles about yourself or about people or organizations that you work for, per Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. I would suggest that you instead work on other articles in your area of knowledge.
If you have any questions, please click this link, then hit the new section and rock and roll. I really like to pretend to know what I'm doing here, so I'm sure I'll give you the right answer, and if I don't, you can whack me with a trout.
Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
By the way, this is not an automated bot that placed this message. Yes, it is boilerplate, but it won't appear anywhere if I don't put it there.
Speedy deletion nomination of Soulflower
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Soulflower, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zodiac may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- IN/in/assets/pdfs/publications/2014/retail-2014-the-anytime-anywhere-universe.pdf Retail 2014 pwc]]</ref>==
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Vivek.bekhabar. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Zodiac, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
In particular, most your edits seem to be related to Soulflower. When most of one's edits promote a single company it creates the impression that a conflict of interest exists. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Conflict of interest in Wikipedia
You appear to be affiliated with http://www.soulflower.biz/, via your edits and your uploads to wikimedia. I am providing you with Wikipedia's formal conflict of interest notice, and have some comments/questions for you below.
Hello, Vivek.bekhabar. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Comments/questions
Wikipedia is a scholarly project, and like all scholarly endeavors, managing COI is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review.
Disclosure first: would you please disclose your relationship with Soulflower? You can reply here with your answer. Best regards Jytdog (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to say that recently I made my account in wikipedia. And I would like to contribute here as a volunteer. I don't have any relationship with Soulflower, its jusy that I have been researching on retail sales, aroma industry and I had a trouble finding the consolidated data, so whatever I am finding from different sources, I am putting the relevant things on wikipedia, which will help other scholars. Also, I will be editing/adding/knowledge sharing on wikipedia on other scholarly articles too. I am keenly interested to contribute to wikipedia as a volunteer. - Thanks Vivek.bekhabar (talk)
- Hi, and thanks for replying. It is hard to believe that you have no relationship with Soulflower; pretty much all your edits are about them. I should have made it more clear, that lots of editors with a conflict of interest start editing Wikipedia unaware of our rules, and that is not a terrible thing - the situation is salvageable. Are you sure you have no relationship with them, or with Shoppers Stop? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 11:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, presently I am doing a research on aroma industry and retail sales, I am not getting information on them on internet easily, so updating the relevent ones, editing the existing pages in this domain and that's why most of mine recent edits are related to it otherwise I don't have any relationship with Shoppers Stop. And as I said I am here as a volunteer and I want to contribute. Feel free to ask if you have more doubts on the same. Thanks Vivek.bekhabar (talk)
- "Industry analysis of Aroma Industry in India" ... Currently I am pursuing MBA and doing this project under subject "Macro-Economics" ...Finding trouble in getting the informations on the same...I hope you are convinced now! Thanks...Vivek.bekhabar (talk)
- Thanks for giving a more clear answer. OK - please be very careful to write neutral copy and to not promote anything in Wikipedia. Your edits to date have been very promotional about specific companies. good luck. Jytdog (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks...I will be careful on the content while editing anything on wikipedia. Vivek.bekhabar (talk)
- Thanks for giving a more clear answer. OK - please be very careful to write neutral copy and to not promote anything in Wikipedia. Your edits to date have been very promotional about specific companies. good luck. Jytdog (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- "Industry analysis of Aroma Industry in India" ... Currently I am pursuing MBA and doing this project under subject "Macro-Economics" ...Finding trouble in getting the informations on the same...I hope you are convinced now! Thanks...Vivek.bekhabar (talk)
Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!
|
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge |
| Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. | |
| Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 23:53, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
| |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Soulflower (June 20)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Soulflower and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Vivek.bekhabar,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:09, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Disambiguation link notification for July 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Subodh Gupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, fixed it. Thanks! Vivek.bekhabar (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 14:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Reference errors on 9 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Lenskart page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hi ReferenceBot, fixed the error. Thanks! Vivek.bekhabar (talk) 05:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk) 13:54, 11 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Winner 42 Talk to me! 22:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).