Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 22: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:15, 14 March 2017

< January 21	January 23 >

January 22

File:DailyShowKilborn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in Craig Kilborn, The Daily Show, and List of The Daily Show writers. While the use in "The Daily Show" is justified because the show debut with Kilborn originally, the usage in other pages shall be evaluated. George Ho (talk) 00:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No uses complying with NFCC requirements. Even in The Daily Show, it is used primarily to illustrate the point that Kilborn hosted it, a point that is conveyed effectively by text alone. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Solar Term vs Zodiac.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is something clearly found on the Internet and reproduced here. As best as I can read the watermark, it's "chinahighlights .com" (space inserted to avoid creating a link) and as best as I can tell, that site is 404. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dia3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 23:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Comment: This file is currently used on User:Ime-tpoo, who also is the file's uploader. Steel1943 (talk) 02:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dia1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 23:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Comment: This file is currently used on User:Ime-tpoo, who also is the file's uploader. Steel1943 (talk) 02:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DisneyChannel2007.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem like simple geometry to me. Passes the threshold of originality. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DisneyChannel2010.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 per WP:NFC#UUI #17. Since this isn't in use on the Disney Channel article anymore, it should be deleted entirely, since removing it from the other articles would orphan this image. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Disney Channel 1986.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used at Disney Channel. No non-free use rationale for History of Disney Channel and fails WP:NFCC#8 currently. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DisneyChannel1997.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used at Disney Channel. No non-free use rationale for History of Disney Channel and fails WP:NFCC#8 currently. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:57, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Disney Channel 1997.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The paint splatter effects are likely enough to pass the threshold of originality. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bicycle violin2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedic ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cycle path.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, not encyclopedic. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:93.9iFMBestfriendMo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free logo, as precaution Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not an own work. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:31, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nik Lagdameo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Professional photo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abby Binay.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Professional photo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SSTSaloSaloTogether.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense to non-free titlecard Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "non-free title card". Salavat (talk) 12:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LunchDate1986.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. Is this simple enough for {{PD-logo}}? ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MTBAngSayaSaya.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Television still. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MasayangTanghaliBayan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Television still. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MagandangTanghaliBayan2002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Television still. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MagandangTanghaliBayan1998.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Television still. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EBC Radyo Agila.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "non-free logo". Primary usage appears to be DZEC-AM with the other articles being relay station of DZEC-AM. If required remove the logo from all but DZEC-AM following conversion to fair use. Salavat (talk) 12:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Salavat, ready to convert the images on this page to non-free? (Would make more sense to do it now rather than having the closer tag each as needing FURs) czar 06:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updated all of the images that I had commented on. In a perfect world I would just relicense these at the same time I comment however I worry that the nominator of the file may react negatively to my decision. Salavat (talk) 07:40, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DXRZ RMN Zamboanga.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DXDCDavao.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 12:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DYHB747.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:10, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 12:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DYRI774.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 12:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DZXL558.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 12:38, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:939iFMCebu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Ozamiz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Tacloban.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Zamboanga.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Bacolod.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo. Salavat (talk) 12:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Iligan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Baguio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Butuan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Dagupan Alternate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Dagupan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM IloIlo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM GenSan.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Laoag.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM CDO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFM Davao Bestfriend Mo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to either non-free logo or PD-ineligible-USonly. The image is mostly text but not sure if it as a whole would fall below the threshold of originality. Salavat (talk) 12:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IVI Ryo 2010 Logo.jpg

Querying copyright status. {{PD-textlogo}}? ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to "PD-ineligible-USonly" as logo falls below the threshold of originality. Philippines is listed on Commons article of TOO so suggest leaving hosted on Wikipedia. Salavat (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Salavat, do you mean it isn't listed? commons:Commons:Threshold of originality czar 09:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah looks that way, my proof reading skills fail again. Salavat (talk) 09:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robinsons Place Dumaguete new Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. czar 09:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work. Logo. Redundant to File:Robinsons Place Manila new Logo.jpg. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:51, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo. Logo is majority the same except for the place name Dumaguete/Manila, so not really redundant. Salavat (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ayala Malls Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Redundant to the higher quality File:Ayala Malls Logo.png. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:442Moldavia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal file. No encyclopedic value. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:418 Rosemary.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal file. No encyclopedic value. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:XBomber Crew Patch (transparency).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work claim. Logo which is unused in mainspace. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:This is a logo of kermanshah university of medical sciences.png

Assuming good faith, but have a concern this is a third party logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to PD-logo or non-free logo. Logo appears pretty basic and may likely fall below TOO. If relicensed to PD-logo, then transfer to Commons. Salavat (talk) 12:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TOO in Iran: commons:Commons:Threshold of originality#Iran czar 06:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArmenianHelicopterShootdown2014.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All video on you tube is copyright unless indicated otherwise? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have much experience uploading images, and I had incorrectly uploaded this one and then replaced it with ArmenianHelicopterShoootdown2014v2.png with what I believe is the correct information, but forgot to delete the first incorrect one, which I have now done. Can you please see if I did the second version right? Thanks in advance. Achemish (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My picture of my wife and a drawing by Bill Mauldin on a wall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FFD referral owing to inclusion of 2D art in image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not every photo that includes a 2 or 3D image in it somewhere is forbidden. This drawing on a wall was never copyrighted, and if it was by default it was never renewed. It is more akin to graffiti than anything else. Carptrash (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Since this is in the US, the artist doesn't need to register copyright. The photo is a derivative work of the drawing, such that the drawing is the subject of the photo. We would need the copyright holder's permission to keep the drawing under a free license, and if we cropped it out, the file would no longer be of use to us. Barring any changes in the previous (ping me, if so), no option but to delete. czar 08:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clifford McEwen exhibit at The Military Museums in Calgary.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Refferal due to 2D art, Canadian FoP IIRC follows UK, in not covering 2D stuff. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Redford H. Mulock.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referral due to 2D art, Canadian FoP IIRC follows UK, in not covering 2D stuff. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Radford.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source listed is NC. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Exterior of Saint Joseph's Church, Biddeford Maine.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License issue, All media is assumed copyright unless indicated otherwise? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete The Panaramio image description page is https://www.panoramio.com/photo/110701203?force_desktop_version which clearly has a Creative Commons license stating no derivatives and non-commercial --Whpq (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Child friendly xray room.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GE Cardiac Catheter Imaging Suite.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pelvis calculations.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rt NOF.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Please delete these files uploaded in CV error by myself User:Glitzy queen00[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OFS time line jpeg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files contain high resolution copyrighted logos of Western Electric, AT&T, Bell Systems, Lucent Technologies, OFS, Furukawa Electric. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OFS timeline.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files contain high resolution copyrighted logos of Western Electric, AT&T, Bell Systems, Lucent Technologies, OFS, Furukawa Electric. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OFS timelinepng.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Files contain high resolution copyrighted logos of Western Electric, AT&T, Bell Systems, Lucent Technologies, OFS, Furukawa Electric. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bar Golf Scoresheet Scan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Nothing indicates the user held the original copyright. Furthermore the file is for a non-notable drinking game (Pub golf) that was deleted twice already. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bar Golf Scoresheet Scan-1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Nothing indicates the user held the original copyright. Furthermore the file is for a non-notable drinking game (Pub golf) that was deleted twice already. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bar Golf Scoresheet Example.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Nothing indicates the user held the original copyright. Furthermore the file is for a non-notable drinking game (Pub golf) that was deleted twice already. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jimmynoonan2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File is professional promotional work and nothing indicates the uploader holds the copyright. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JimmyNoonanandBatista1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File is professional promotional work and nothing indicates the uploader holds the copyright. It could very well be WWE screen capture. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JimmyNoonan1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File is professional promotional work and nothing indicates the uploader holds the copyright. It could very well be WWE screen capture. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Litchfield FlorenceFallsCreek.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Uploader has no edits in the main namespace and the file is low in resolution. It feels more like stolen web resolution quality but I have not identified it in a reverse image search. File is from 2006 so the original website (assuming it's stolen) could be long gone. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Litchfield TolmerFalls.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Uploader has no edits in the main namespace and the file is low in resolution. It feels more like stolen web resolution quality but I have not identified it in a reverse image search. File is from 2006 so the original website (assuming it's stolen) could be long gone. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Litchfield 021.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file could be taken by the uploader as exif indicates they are more likely snapped photos but they could very well be stolen from someones personal website) The file is of Florence Falls with people in it. They look like travel photos. It is a bit blurry and we do have a better alternative on commons that is in use with an uploader that has edits (albeit very few since 2006, which is more than fine) whom added the file to the article. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 15:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TRO Records Logo 2017.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: move to Commons czar 08:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third party logo? Below TOO in any event. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo appears to be below TOO. Relicense to PD-logo and transfer to Commons. Salavat (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:My Studio my Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused promotional file. File was uploaded by an indefinitely blocked user. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 17:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prateek in Pine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused promotional file. File was uploaded by an indefinitely blocked user. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 17:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SURER SAGAR.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious copyright claim of unused promotional file. File was uploaded by an indefinitely blocked user. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 17:14, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:37737 404918494425 513329425 4507479 4399564 n.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic use. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A kid playing soccer - bad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic use. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iowa State fans rush field after beating Oklahoma State in 2011.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image of fans celebrating a football victory fails WP:NFCC#8 as there is no discussion, sourced or otherwise about the fan celebration. Whpq (talk) 18:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pieris brassicae Butterflies of Panjab University Chandigarh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 08:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a referral to FFD, because although life is "replaceable" this may be a rare species, hence I wanted a second opinion before disputing the NFUR in more depth. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a rare species, then it satisfies WP:NFCC#1. However, the image fails WP:NFCC#8 as it is no critically discussed in the article it is linked to. -FASTILY 08:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And plenty of free use alternatives: commons:Category:Pieris brassicae on flowers czar 08:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ClassfeverLogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep czar 08:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FFD referal, Not so sure this is below TOO in India. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hosted on Wikipedia the file would only need to meet the United States TOO standards. India's TOO is only applicable if on Commons. Saying that though i'm not sure whether the "F" is simple enough. Salavat (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Salavat, I'd assume this is an exploration into whether to move to Commons. Only usage is in an article stuck at AfC so I'd just leave it here for now. No word on TOO in India. Would make more sense for someone to update the TOO Commons page on India first czar 08:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Br-Ba4 Finale.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gus kills Vic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike and Gus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike jessecover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jesse and walt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jesse RabidDog.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walt confronts Tuco, proclaiming, "This...is not meth.".png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walt 1 2m Br Ba.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WaltJesseMike.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jesse&Lydia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walt and mike.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Waltskyler+money.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jesse Walt-Mike.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid NFUR: not used for education but decoration. Also far too high resolution. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thewelcomingjesus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Czar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content, there is no FOP for 3D works in the USA FASTILY 22:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ingrid Pitt Author Book Cover.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not critically discussed. On the article about the actress. Doesn't meet fair use policy. Majora (talk) 22:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FutureBASIC Editor.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of non-free software. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept as a free image. added PD-USonly to prevent copying to commons- Peripitus (Talk) 10:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Querying whether the road/bridge HA logo thing passes threshold of originality. See [1] for an idea of what the logo usually looks like. The "road" arrangement may be original enough, especially for the UK. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally logos are not typically covered by OGL, as I understood it. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd PD-USonly these uncontroversially. UK TOO is super low. czar 08:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carnevale-Noli-2 per piano.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheet music from 1980s or later. Derivative work of copyrighted material. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carnevale-progression.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheet music from 1980s or later. Derivative work of copyrighted material. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carnevale.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work claim. Seems older than 2004 and possibly professional. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

@@ Line 999: / Line 999: @@
 ====[[:File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF]]====
+<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this section. ''
+The result of the discussion was: '''kept''' as a free image. added PD-USonly to prevent copying to commons- [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 10:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)<!--Template:Ffd top-->
 :<span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx" id="File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF">[[:File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF]] ([{{fullurl:File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+discussion%2F2017+January+22%23File%3AHighways-agency-manager.GIF%5D%5D}} delete] {{!}} [[File talk:Highways-agency-manager.GIF|talk]] {{!}} [{{fullurl:File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF|action=history}} history] {{!}} [[Special:WhatLinksHere/File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF|links]] {{!}} [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3AHighways-agency-manager.GIF}} logs])</span>&#x20;– uploaded by [[User talk:Timothy Titus#File:Highways-agency-manager.GIF listed for discussion|Timothy Titus]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User talk:Timothy Titus|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=File%3AHighways-agency-manager.GIF&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> {{!}} [[Special:Contributions/Timothy Titus|contribs]] {{!}} [[Special:ListFiles/Timothy Titus|uploads]] {{!}} [[Special:Log/upload/Timothy Titus|upload log]]).&nbsp;
@@ Line 1,005: / Line 1,009: @@
 : Additionally logos are not typically covered by OGL, as I understood it. [[User:Sfan00 IMG|Sfan00 IMG]] ([[User talk:Sfan00 IMG|talk]]) 09:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd PD-USonly these uncontroversially. UK TOO is super low. <span style="background:#F0F0FF; padding:3px 9px 4px">[[User talk:Czar|<span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em Avenir;color:#B048B5'>czar</span>]]</span> 08:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this section. <!--Template:Ffd bottom--></div>
 ====[[:File:Carnevale-Noli-2 per piano.jpg]]====