Jump to content

Earworm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Materialscientist (talk | contribs) at 23:06, 30 November 2023 (Reverted edits by 68.205.227.43 (talk) (HG) (3.4.12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

An earworm or brainworm,[1] also known as sticky music or stuck song syndrome,[2] is a catchy or memorable piece of music or saying that continuously occupies a person's mind even after it is no longer being played or spoken about.[3][4] Involuntary Musical Imagery (INMI) is most common after earworms,[5][6][7][8][9] but INMI as a label is not solely restricted to earworms; musical hallucinations also fall into this category, although they are not the same thing.[6][10] Earworms are considered to be a common type of involuntary cognition.[11] Some of the phrases often used to describe earworms include "musical imagery repetition" and "involuntary musical imagery".[1][12][13]

The word earworm is a calque from the German Ohrwurm.[14][15] The earliest known English usage is in Desmond Bagley's 1978 novel Flyaway, where the author points out the German origin of his word.[16]

Researchers who have studied and written about the phenomenon include Theodor Reik,[17] Sean Bennett,[18] Oliver Sacks,[1] Daniel Levitin,[19] James Kellaris,[20] Philip Beaman,[21] Vicky Williamson,[22] Diana Deutsch,[23] and, in a more theoretical perspective, Peter Szendy,[24] along with many more. The phenomenon should be distinct from palinacousis, a rare medical condition caused by damage to the temporal lobe of the brain that results in auditory hallucinations.[25]

Incidence and causes

Researcher Vicky Williamson at Goldsmiths, University of London, found in an uncontrolled study that earworms correlated with music exposure, but could also be triggered by experiences that trigger the memory of a song (involuntary memory) such as seeing a word that reminds one of the song, hearing a few notes from the song, or feeling an emotion one associates with the song. The list of songs collected in the study showed no particular pattern, other than popularity.[2]

According to research by James Kellaris, 98% of individuals experience earworms. Women and men experience the phenomenon equally often, but earworms tend to last longer for women and irritate them more.[26] Kellaris produced statistics suggesting that songs with lyrics may account for 73.7% of earworms, whereas instrumental music may cause only 7.7%.[27]

In 2010, published data in the British Journal of Psychology directly addressed the subject, and its results support earlier claims that earworms are usually 15 to 30 seconds in length and are more common in those with an interest in music.[21]

Earworms can occur with 'positive' or 'negative' music.[11] Positive music in this case would be music that sounds happy and/or calm. Negative music would be the opposite, where the music sounds angry or sad. Earworms are also not solely regulated to only music with lyrics; in a research experiment conducted by Ella Moeck and her colleagues in an attempt to find out if the positive/negative feeling of the music affected earworms caused by that piece, they only used instrumental music.[11] Her experiment determined that all participants experienced a similar quantity of earworms, regardless of the emotional valence, although the quality of the earworm did vary. The earworms born from the negatively valenced music brought about more distress and occurred less frequently than those produced by positively valenced music.[11]

Antidotes

Scientists at Western Washington University found that engaging working memory in moderately difficult tasks such as anagrams, puzzles or reading was an effective way of stopping earworms and of reducing their recurrence.[28] Another publication points out that melodic music has a tendency to demonstrate repeating rhythm which may lead to endless repetition, unless a climax can be achieved to break the cycle.[29]

Research reported in 2015 by the School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences at the University of Reading demonstrated that chewing gum could help by similarly blocking the sub-vocal rehearsal component of auditory short-term or "working" memory associated with generating and manipulating auditory and musical images.[30] It has also been suggested to ask oneself why one is experiencing this particular song.[23] Another suggested remedy is to try to find a "cure song" to stop the repeating music.[31][32]

There are also so-called "cure songs" or "cure tunes" to get the earworm out of one's head. "God Save the King" is cited as a very popular and helpful choice of cure song.[33] "Happy Birthday" was also a popular choice in cure songs.[31]

Individual songs may become less likely to cause an earworm as their exciting effect fades as a result of excessive repetition.

Listening to the tune in a different/lower tempo or lower pitch, or a remixed version if it exists, can be an antidote. Listening to the tune from start to finish can also help. Since earworms are usually only a fragment of music, playing the tune all the way through can help break the loop.[34]

Notable cases

Jean Harris, who murdered Herman Tarnower, was obsessed with the song "Put the Blame on Mame", which she first heard in the film Gilda. She would recall this regularly for over 33 years and could hold a conversation while playing it in her mind.[35]

Mark Twain's 1876 story "A Literary Nightmare" (also known as "Punch, Brothers, Punch") is about a jingle that one can get rid of only by transferring it to another person.

In 1943 Henry Kuttner published the short story "Nothing but Gingerbread Left" about a song engineered to damage the Nazi war effort, culminating in Adolf Hitler being unable to continue a speech.[36]

In Alfred Bester's 1953 novel The Demolished Man, the protagonist uses a jingle specifically crafted to be a catchy, irritating nuisance as a tool to block mind readers from reading his mind.

In Arthur C. Clarke's 1957 science fiction short story "The Ultimate Melody", a scientist, Gilbert Lister, develops the ultimate melody – one that so compels the brain that its listener becomes completely and forever enraptured by it. As the storyteller, Harry Purvis, explains, Lister theorized that a great melody "made its impression on the mind because it fitted in with the fundamental electrical rhythms going on in the brain." Lister attempts to abstract from the hit tunes of the day to a melody that fits in so well with the electrical rhythms that it dominates them completely. He succeeds and is found in a catatonic state from which he never awakens.[37]

In Fritz Leiber's Hugo Award-nominated short story "Rump-Titty-Titty-Tum-TAH-Tee" (1959), the title describes a rhythmic drumbeat so powerful that it rapidly spreads to all areas of human culture, until a counter-rhythm is developed that acts as an antidote.[38]

In Joe Simpson's 1988 book Touching the Void, he talks about not being able to get the tune "Brown Girl in the Ring" by Boney M out of his head. The book tells of his survival, against the odds, after a mountaineering accident in the remote Siula Grande region of South America. Alone, badly injured, and in a semi-delirious state, he is confused as to whether he is imagining the music or really hearing it.[39]

In the Dexter's Laboratory episode titled "Head Band", a contagious group of viruses force their host to sing what they are saying to the same "boy band" tune. The only way to be cured of the Boy Band Virus is for the viruses to break up and start their own solo careers.[40]

In the SpongeBob SquarePants episode titled “Earworm”, SpongeBob gets the “Musical Doodle” song stuck in his head, giving him an earworm, which ultimately turns out to be an actual worm, which is removed by his friends singing or playing other songs.

In The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part is in a scene in which most of the film's characters are subjected to "Catchy Song" and all except Lucy dance to it, while simultaneously the denizens of Harmony Town sing it to Emmet and Rex. Lucy/Wildstyle avoids being "brainwashed" by the song by breaking one of the speakers and using some of its pieces to build earmuffs for herself before escaping via air ducts, while Emmet and Rex escape in a similar fashion.

E. B. White's 1933 satirical short story "The Supremacy of Uruguay" (reprinted in Timeless Stories for Today and Tomorrow) relates a fictional episode in the history of Uruguay where a powerful earworm is discovered in a popular American song. The Uruguayan military builds a squadron of pilotless aircraft armed with phonographs playing a highly amplified recording of the earworm, and conquers the entire world by reducing the citizens of all nations to mindless insanity. "[T]he peoples were hopelessly mad, ravaged by an ineradicable noise ... No one could hear anything except the noise in his own head."[41]

Key characteristics

According to research done in 2016 by the American Psychological Association, there are certain characteristics that make songs more likely to become earworms. Earworm songs usually have a fast-paced tempo and an easy-to-remember melody. However, earworms also tend to have unusual intervals or repetitions that make them stand out from other songs. Earworms also tend to be played on the radio more than other songs and are usually featured at the top of the charts.[42] The chorus of a song is one of the most reported causes of earworms.[43]

The most frequently named earworms during this study were the following:

  1. "Bad Romance" by Lady Gaga
  2. "Can't Get You Out of My Head" by Kylie Minogue
  3. "Don't Stop Believin'" by Journey
  4. "Somebody That I Used to Know" by Gotye
  5. "Moves like Jagger" by Maroon 5
  6. "California Gurls" by Katy Perry
  7. "Bohemian Rhapsody" by Queen
  8. "Alejandro" by Lady Gaga
  9. "Poker Face" by Lady Gaga

Susceptible traits

Kazumasa Negishi and Takahiro Sekiguchi did a study to see if there are specific traits that make a person more or less susceptible to earworms or involuntary musical imagery.[44] The participants in the study were assessed on obsessive-compulsive tendencies, the Big Five personality traits, and musical expertise. Negishi and Sekiguchi found that some of the obsessive-compulsive traits, such as intrusive thoughts, played a role in experiencing earworms while compulsive washing did not. In terms of the Big Five personality traits, neuroticism significantly predicted occurrences of earworms. Musical expertise created an effect of sophistication when it came to earworm occurrences.

Tools used in data gathering

One tool used to gather data on involuntary musical imagery (INMI)—and, more specifically, earworms—is called the Involuntary Musical Imagery Scale; it was created with the research compiled from George Floridou, Victoria Williamson, and Danial Müllensiefen. It uses four factors to measure different experiences surrounding earworms and INMI in general.[45] Those four factors include 'Negative Valence', 'Movement', 'Personal Reflections', and 'Help'.[45] Negative Valence is the category that measures the subjective response to the INMI experience.[45] Movement is a relatively new aspect to apply to INMI, it is essentially the INMI experience with accompanied embodied responses, which can include singing, humming, and dancing.[45] Personal Reflections is the occurrence of a personal quality, like unrelated thoughts, associated with the INMI; which are not directly related to the valence of the INMI itself.[45] Help is the category which determines the beneficial and constructive aspects to the INMI experiences, which could potentially reflect similarities in the characteristics of unfocused music listing and task-unrelated thought.[45]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Sacks, Oliver (2007). Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain. First Vintage Books. pp. 41–48. ISBN 978-1-4000-3353-9.
  2. ^ a b Chatterjee, Rhitu (March 7, 2012). "Earworms: Why songs get stuck in our heads". BBC News.
  3. ^ "Oxford Dictionaries: "earworm"". Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on March 29, 2013. Retrieved July 4, 2013.
  4. ^ Halpern, Andrea R.; Bartlett, James C. (April 1, 2011). "The Persistence of Musical Memories: A Descriptive Study of Earworms". Music Perception. 28 (4): 425–432. doi:10.1525/mp.2011.28.4.425. ISSN 0730-7829.
  5. ^ Jakubowski, Kelly; Finkel, Sebastian; Stewart, Lauren; Müllensiefen, Daniel (2017). "Dissecting an earworm: Melodic features and song popularity predict involuntary musical imagery" (PDF). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 11 (2). American Psychological Association (APA): 122–135. doi:10.1037/aca0000090. ISSN 1931-390X.
  6. ^ a b Williams, T. I. (2015). "The classification of involuntary musical imagery: The case for earworms" (PDF). Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain. 15 (1). American Psychological Association: 5–13. doi:10.1037/pmu0000082.
  7. ^ Williamson, Victoria J.; Jilka, Sagar R.; Fry, Joshua; Finkel, Sebastian; Müllensiefen, Daniel; Stewart, Lauren (September 27, 2011). "How do "earworms" start? Classifying the everyday circumstances of Involuntary Musical Imagery". Psychology of Music. 40 (3): 259–284. doi:10.1177/0305735611418553. S2CID 145466099.
  8. ^ Filippidi, I.; Timmers, R. (2017). "Relationships between everyday music listening habits and involuntary musical imagery: Does music listening condition musical imagery?". Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain. 27 (4). American Psychological Association: 312–326. doi:10.1037/pmu0000194. S2CID 149182669.
  9. ^ Jakubowski, Kelly; Farrugia, Nicolas; Halpern, Andrea R.; Sankarpandi, Sathish K.; Stewart, Lauren (November 1, 2015). "The speed of our mental soundtracks: Tracking the tempo of involuntary musical imagery in everyday life". Memory & Cognition. 43 (8): 1229–1242. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0531-5. ISSN 1532-5946. PMC 4624826. PMID 26122757.
  10. ^ Hemming, J.; Merrill, J. (2015). "On the distinction between involuntary musical imagery, musical hallucinosis, and musical hallucinations". Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain. 25 (4). American Psychological Association: 435–442. doi:10.1037/pmu0000112.
  11. ^ a b c d Moeck, E. K.; Hyman, I. E; Takarangi, M. K. Y. (2018). "Understanding the overlap between positive and negative involuntary cognitions using instrumental earworms". Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain. 28 (3). American Psychological Association: 164–177. doi:10.1037/pmu0000217. S2CID 150180837.
  12. ^ Liikkanen, L. A. (2012). "Inducing involuntary musical imagery: An experimental study" (PDF). Musicae Scientiae. 16 (2): 217–234. doi:10.1177/1029864912440770. S2CID 146451325.
  13. ^ Liikkanen, Lassi A. (2008). "Music in Everymind: Commonality of Involuntary Musical Imagery" (PDF). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC 10). Sapporo, Japan: 408–412. ISBN 978-4-9904208-0-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 3, 2014.
  14. ^ "earworm", wordspy.com
  15. ^ "Ohrwurm", www.dwds.de
  16. ^ Kruszelnicki, Dr Karl (November 29, 2016). "The earworms you can't get out of your head". ABC Radio National. Retrieved May 1, 2022.
  17. ^ Reik, Theodor (1953). The Haunting Melody: Psychoanalytic Experiences in Life and Music. New York: Grove Press.
  18. ^ Bennett, Sean (August 30, 2002). Musical Imagery Repetition (Master). Cambridge University.
  19. ^ Levitin, Daniel (2006). This Is Your Brain on Music: The Science of a Human Obsession. New York: Dutton, Penguin. ISBN 0452288525. Retrieved August 7, 2012.
  20. ^ Kellaris, James J. (Winter 2001). "Identifying Properties of Tunes That Get 'Stuck in Your Head'". Proceedings of the Society for Consumer Psychology. Scottsdale, Arizona: American Psychological Society: 66–67.
  21. ^ a b Beaman CP, Williams TI (November 2010). "Earworms (stuck song syndrome): towards a natural history of intrusive thoughts". British Journal of Psychology. 101 (Pt 4): 637–653. doi:10.1348/000712609X479636. PMID 19948084.
  22. ^ Chatterjee, Rhitu (March 6, 2012). "Earworms: Why songs get stuck in our heads". BBC News. Retrieved March 7, 2012.
  23. ^ a b Deutsch, D. (2019). "Catchy Music and Earworms". Musical Illusions and Phantom Words: How Music and Speech Unlock Mysteries of the Brain. Oxford University Press. pp. 116–127. ISBN 9780190206833. LCCN 2018051786.
  24. ^ Szendy, Peter (2012). Hits. Philosophy in the Jukebox. translated by William Bishop. Fordham University Press.
  25. ^ Moore, David R.; Fuchs, Paul Paul Albert; Rees, Adrian; Palmer, Alan; Plack, Christopher J. (January 21, 2010). The Oxford Handbook of Auditory Science: The Auditory Brain. Oxford University Press. p. 535. ISBN 9780199233281. Retrieved July 3, 2013.
  26. ^ Adams, Cecil (October 16, 2009), "Why do songs get stuck in your head?", The Straight Dope
  27. ^ Hoffman, Carey (April 4, 2001). "Songs That Cause The Brain To 'Itch': UC Professor Investigating Why Certain Tunes Get Stuck In Our Heads". University of Cincinnati. Retrieved August 6, 2012. Of the 1,000 respondents, the kind of music respondents said they got stuck on most recently were songs with lyrics for 73.7 percent, jingles or ads for 18.6 percent and an instrumental tune for 7.7 percent.
  28. ^ Gray, Richard (March 24, 2013). "Get that tune out of your head – scientists find how to get rid of earworms". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on March 24, 2013. Retrieved March 25, 2013.
  29. ^ Schwanauer, Stephan M.; Levitt, David A. (1993). Machine Models of Music. MIT Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-0-262-19319-1.
  30. ^ "Listen up – new research shows chewing gum could remove that stuck record in your head", University of Reading, 22 April 2015
  31. ^ a b "Science Identified 'Cure Songs' to Get Songs Unstuck From Your Brain, I Guess All Diseases Have Been Cured" by Dan Van Winkle, The Mary Sue, March 3, 2014
  32. ^ Williamson VJ, Liikkanen LA, Jakubowski K, Stewart L (2014). "Sticky tunes: how do people react to involuntary musical imagery?". PLOS ONE. 9 (1): e86170. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...986170W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086170. PMC 3908735. PMID 24497938.
  33. ^ "Music : How to get rid of an earworm". Durham University. Retrieved July 19, 2020., citing Williamson et al. 2014
  34. ^ "How do you get rid of an earworm?". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. April 16, 2020.
  35. ^ Díaz de Chumaceiro, Cora L. (October 16, 2004). "Jean Harris' Obsessive Film Song Recall". PsyArt. Archived from the original on August 1, 2019. Retrieved December 11, 2011.
  36. ^ Kuttner, Henry. "Nothing But Gingerbread Left". Archived from the original on March 14, 2012. Retrieved October 10, 2017. Full text of story
  37. ^ Chorost, Michael, "The Ultimate Melody by Arthur C. Clarke", The Web site of aleph, archived from the original on January 1, 2011, retrieved August 17, 2010
  38. ^ Pretor-Pinney, Gavin (2010), The Wavewatcher's Companion, Bloomsbury Publishing, p. 218, ISBN 978-0-7475-8976-1
  39. ^ Simpson, Joe (1988). Touching the Void. ISBN 9780060160272.
  40. ^ "Dexter's Laboratory: Head Band / Stuffed Animal House / Used Ink". TV.com. Retrieved May 29, 2014.
  41. ^ "The Supremacy of Uruguay". www.armandobronca.com. July 24, 2007. Archived from the original on February 27, 2014. Retrieved January 17, 2014.
  42. ^ "Psychologists Identify Key Characteristics of Earworms". American Psychological Association. November 3, 2016. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  43. ^ Beaman, C. Philip; Williams, Tim I. (2010). "Earworms (stuck song syndrome): Towards a natural history of intrusive thoughts" (PDF). British Journal of Psychology. 101 (4): 637–653. doi:10.1348/000712609X479636. ISSN 2044-8295. PMID 19948084.
  44. ^ Negishi, Kazumasa; Sekiguchi, Takahiro (June 4, 2020). Sudzina, Frantisek (ed.). "Individual traits that influence the frequency and emotional characteristics of involuntary musical imagery: An experience sampling study". PLOS ONE. 15 (6): e0234111. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1534111N. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234111. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 7272041. PMID 32497111.
  45. ^ a b c d e f Floridou, G. A.; Williamson, V. J.; Stewart, L.; Müllensiefen, D. (2015). "The Involuntary Musical Imagery Scale (IMIS)" (PDF). Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, & Brain. 25. American Psychological Association: 28–36. doi:10.1037/pmu0000067.

Further reading