Jump to content

Al-Khalasa: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 October 2024

21 September 2024

25 May 2024

7 March 2022

30 October 2021

12 September 2021

12 August 2021

27 July 2021

26 July 2021

  • curprev 03:2503:25, 26 July 2021 Arminden talk contribs 8,320 bytes −841 History: Al-Khalasa was a 20th-century village (after WWI until 1948, some 30 years), with no Arab habitation at the site since c. the 8th century (a gap of some 1200 years). Logic requires that the bulk of the historical information goes to the main article, the one dedicated to the ancient site. undo
  • curprev 02:0702:07, 26 July 2021 Arminden talk contribs 9,161 bytes +9 Nobody knows how the Nabateans called the road station, later city at Al-Khalasa. undo
  • curprev 02:0202:02, 26 July 2021 Arminden talk contribs 9,152 bytes +451 BS patrol || No "Abraham Zenobius" + wrong link || christusrex quotes Negev || Nothing in the wrongly quoted Revue Biblique p. 597, nor in any other source, about the settlement surviving beyond the 7th c. => removed misleading part. Philistines here are fantasy, as are the Mamluks. undo

25 July 2021

  • curprev 20:1520:15, 25 July 2021 Arminden talk contribs 8,701 bytes +13 Elusa is also derived from the older Semitic name used by the Nabataeans, whatever that one might have been, as we don't seem to have it from any source, as all we have are Hellenised forms. The Arabic name maybe did come closer, but it didn't have to "restore" the Nab. name, which it didn't. It did happen elsewhere, but not here. undo
  • curprev 20:0920:09, 25 July 2021 Arminden talk contribs 8,688 bytes +661 Structure || Dimashqi: that's what the source says. NOT about the state of the site during his time! It was utterly misleading. The Maqrizi part still is, as is much of the way Khalidi is quoted. undo

29 December 2020

16 December 2020

6 December 2020

26 July 2020

25 July 2020

13 July 2020

7 December 2019

10 May 2019

21 March 2019

11 February 2019

19 December 2018

6 October 2018

2 July 2018

29 June 2018

  • curprev 20:3220:32, 29 June 2018 97.98.86.66 talk 6,975 bytes 0 spelling/typo undo
  • curprev 20:3120:31, 29 June 2018 97.98.86.66 talk 6,975 bytes +437 replace uncited claim which is opposite of the wiki article regarding the city's ancient history (what the oldest names of the city are...and not Byzantinian names) w/neutral language & WIKIFY with a link to the article about the older levels of the Tel. "Bedou" is singular, "BedouIN" is the plural, so "Bedouins" with an "s" is improper. Added 2 citations. undo

23 August 2017

5 February 2017

24 January 2017

2 January 2017

14 November 2016

26 July 2016

1 November 2015

9 August 2015

12 January 2015

28 July 2014

10 April 2014

12 March 2014

5 May 2013

17 March 2013

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)