Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now
|United States, Peru, Argentina, Mexico, India, Canada|
|Bertha Lewis (2008–2010)|
|US$25 Million, 10% federal funding|
The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) is a collection of community-based organizations in the United States and internationally that advocated for low- and moderate-income families by working on neighborhood safety, voter registration, health care, affordable housing, and other social issues. At its peak ACORN had over 500,000 members and more than 1,200 neighborhood chapters in over 100 cities across the U.S., as well as in Argentina, Canada, Mexico, and Peru. ACORN was founded in 1970 by Wade Rathke and Gary Delgado. Its U.S. offices filed for Chapter 7 liquidation on November 2, 2010, effectively closing the organization. Many ACORN members and organizers formed new state-wide organizations.
ACORN has conducted voter registration drives, as well as working to remove systemic barriers to registration of low and working-class voters. The Republican Party regularly alleged that it committed voter fraud, but few cases have been found or prosecuted. The organization conducted its own audits and cooperated with investigations of employees, referring some cases to law enforcement.
On an unrelated issue, ACORN suffered an extremely damaging nationwide controversy beginning in the fall of 2009 after two conservative activists secretly made and released videos of staged interactions with low-level ACORN personnel in several offices, portraying them as encouraging criminal behavior. Some media publicized the videos without investigation. These videos were later found in several independent law enforcement investigations to have been partially falsified and selectively edited by the activists, James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles.  The organization suffered an immediate loss of funding from government agencies with which it had contracts, and from private donors prior to the results of any investigations. Legislative amendments to spending bills in the United States House and Senate prohibited government funding of the group.
Four different independent investigations by various state and city Attorneys General and the GAO released in 2009 and 2010 cleared ACORN, finding its employees had not engaged in the alleged criminal activities and that the organization had managed its federal funding appropriately. Their reports described the videos as deceptively edited to present the workers in the worst possible light. The loss of funds had been too damaging and by March 2010, 15 of ACORN's 30 state chapters had already closed. ACORN announced it was closing its remaining state chapters and disbanding. Some state chapters have reorganized to continue operations under different names.
- 1 Organization
- 2 Issues and actions
- 3 History
- 4 Budget
- 5 Controversies
- 6 References
- 7 Bibliography
- 8 External links
ACORN was composed of a number of legally distinct nonprofit entities and affiliates including a nationwide umbrella organization established as a 501(c)(4) that performed lobbying; local chapters established as 501(c)(3) nonpartisan charities; and the national nonprofit and nonstock organization, ACORN Housing Corporation. ACORN's priorities included: better housing and wages for the poor, more community development investment from banks and governments, better public schools, labor-oriented causes and social justice issues. ACORN pursued these goals through demonstration, negotiation, lobbying for legislation, and voter participation.
Issues and actions
Predatory lending and affordable housing
ACORN investigated complaints against companies accused of predatory lending practices. ACORN also worked to support strict state laws against predatory practices, organized against foreclosure rescue scams, and steered borrowers toward loan counseling; Following a three-year campaign, Household International (now owned by HSBC Holdings and renamed HSBC Finance Corporation), one of the largest subprime lenders in the country, and ACORN announced on November 25, 2003 a proposed settlement of a 2002 national class-action lawsuit brought by ACORN. The settlement created a $72 million foreclosure avoidance program to provide relief to household borrowers who were at risk of losing their homes. The settlement came on the heels of an earlier $484 million settlement between Household, Attorneys General, and bank regulators from all 50 U.S. states.
ACORN and its affiliates advocated for affordable housing by urging the development, rehabilitation and establishment of housing trust funds at the local, state, and federal levels. The group also pushed for enforcement of affordable-housing requirements for developers and promoted programs to help homeowners repair their homes and organize tenant demands. An ACORN official voiced support for a proposal Hillary Clinton made during the 2008 presidential primary election to create a federal fund for distressed homeowners.
Living wage ordinances require private businesses that do business with the government to pay their workers a wage that enables them to afford basic necessities. ACORN has helped pass local living wage laws in 15 cities including Chicago, New Westminster, British Columbia, Oakland, California, Denver, Colorado, and New York City. ACORN maintained a website that provides strategic and logistical assistance on this issue to organizations nationwide.
Hurricane Katrina relief
ACORN members across the country, particularly in the Gulf region, organized fund-raising and organizing drives to ensure that victims of Hurricane Katrina received assistance and will be able to return to affected areas. ACORN's home clean-out demonstration program has gutted and rebuilt over 1,850 homes with the help of volunteers. The ACORN Katrina Survivors Association formed in the aftermath of the storm is the first nationwide organization for Katrina survivors and has been working for equitable treatment for victims. Displaced citizens were bused into the city for the New Orleans primary and general elections. By October 2007, ACORN said its Housing Services had helped more than 2,000 homeowners affected by the storm. The non-profit was officially working with the city on reconstruction.
ACORN supported education reform, usually in the form of organizing neighborhood groups and "community" or "ACORN schools". In Chicago, ACORN has advocated for a certified teacher to be in every classroom. In California, ACORN has documented the need for textbooks and school repairs. ACORN works with teachers unions to gain funding for school construction and more funding for schools. ACORN also supports school reform and the "creation of alternative public schools" such as charter schools. ACORN opposed the privatization of some NYC schools, favoring its own Charter School plan. The ACORN model for schools emphasizes small classes, parent involvement, qualified teachers and "community-oriented curricula".
Since the 1980s, ACORN has conducted large-scale voter registration drives, focusing primarily on registering poor and minority citizens. During the 2008 election season, ACORN gathered over 1.3 million voter registration forms in 21 states. Some of these registration forms were flagged by ACORN's internal auditors for review by election officials. Project Vote estimated that 400,000 registrations collected by ACORN were ultimately rejected, the vast majority for being duplicate registrations submitted by citizens. (This is also a common problem at government voter registration services, according to reports on the National Voter Registration Act by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission). An unknown number of registrations were fraudulent, but Project Vote estimated that only a few percent were, based on past years and samples from some drives in 2008. No official in states where voter registration drives were conducted has documented substantial numbers of fraudulent registrations. Project Vote estimated that 450,000 of the registrations collected by ACORN represented first-time voters, while the remainder were address changes submitted by citizens updating their addresses.
As required by law in most states, ACORN must submit all registration forms collected by its workers, including those flagged by ACORN as incomplete or suspicious. Fraudulent voter registrations are investigated at local, state, and federal levels, and have sometimes resulted in criminal convictions for ACORN employees. ACORN has fired employees for fraudulent registration practices and turned them over to authorities. As of 2006, ACORN was improving its fraud detection and reporting procedures, and cooperating with authorities in efforts to prosecute violators. Jeff Ordower, ACORN's Midwest Director, observed, "There is no scenario where those people on problematic cards would show up at the polls." Of 26,513 registrations submitted by ACORN over a nine-month period in San Diego County, California, 4,655 were initially flagged, but 2,806 of those were later validated. County officials said this resulted in a 7% error rate by ACORN, compared to usually less than 5% for voter drives by other organizations.
In a 2007 case in Washington state, in which seven temporary employees of ACORN were charged with submitting fraudulent voter registrations, ACORN agreed to pay King County $25,000 for its investigative costs and acknowledged that the national organization could be subject to criminal prosecution if fraud occurs again. According to the prosecutor, the misconduct was done "as an easy way to get paid [by ACORN], not as an attempt to influence the outcome of elections." In August 2008, ACORN caught, fired and reported employees Maria Miles and Kevin Clancy of Milwaukee, who later pled guilty to repeatedly registering the names of the same registered voters. In May 2009, six ACORN employees in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pled guilty to charges of a combined total of 51 counts of forgery and other violations while registering voters during the 2008 election cycle.
In plea deals in a 2009 Las Vegas case, former ACORN field director Amy Busefink and ACORN official Christopher Edwards pled guilty to "conspiracy to commit the crime of compensation for registration of voters," in connection with a quota system for paid registration staff. Edwards was sentenced to a year's probation and agreed to testify for prosecutors in charges against ACORN and against Busefink. Busefink appealed her case to the Nevada Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of the statute. In April 2011, ACORN entered a guilty plea to one count of felony compensation for registration of voters, for which they were fined $5000, but did not concede that the law was constitutional.
In addition to conducting voter registration drives, ACORN has worked to remove systemic obstacles to voter registration. In 2006, it brought a lawsuit in federal court in Ohio against the Ohio Secretary of State, at that time Ken Blackwell, and the Director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. ACORN alleged that, during the period that included the 2004 United States election voting controversies, the defendants had committed multiple violations of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993. The district court dismissed the case, but that decision was reversed in 2008 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. After extensive fact discovery in 2009, the parties agreed to a settlement, under which the defendants agreed to implement several measures to facilitate registration of low-income voters to bring the state into compliance with the National Voting Rights Act. The Dayton Daily News characterized the settlement as "accepting the thrust of [ACORN's] complaint."
In 2006, ACORN intervened on behalf of Jersey City, New Jersey, in a lawsuit brought against the city challenging a local ordinance that limited individuals' handgun purchases to one gun a month. The Hudson County Superior Court struck down the ordinance on the grounds that it violated the New Jersey Constitution's Equal Protection clause, and a state statute prohibiting towns and municipalities from enacting firearms legislation. On September 29, 2008, the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division denied ACORN's appeal of the Hudson County Superior Court's decision striking down Jersey City's ordinance.
Home Defender Program
In 2009, ACORN advocated allowing homeowners delinquent in their mortgage payments to remain in their homes pending a government solution to the housing foreclosure crisis. ACORN introduced a program called the Home Defender Program, intended to mobilize people to congregate at homes faced with foreclosure to "defend a family's right to stay in their homes." One ACORN Web page advocated civil disobedience against foreclosure evictions stating that people in foreclosed homes should refuse to leave, and in some cases, move back in.
the United States
|Housing and justice|
Wade Rathke founded ACORN in 1970, after the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) sent him to Little Rock, Arkansas, as an organizer. Rathke had previously dropped out of Williams College to promote draft resistance for Students for a Democratic Society. Gary Delgado and George Wiley were also instrumental in its founding. ACORN's first campaign was to help welfare recipients attain their basic needs, such as clothing and furniture. This drive, inspired by a clause in the Arkansas welfare laws, began their effort to create and sustain a movement to assist welfare and lower-income working individuals; they developed the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now, the beginnings of ACORN.
In 1975, ACORN created branches in Texas and South Dakota. On December 13, 1975, sixty leaders from the three ACORN states elected the first associate Executive Board and the first ACORN president, Steve McDonald, to deal with matters beyond the scope of the individual city and state boards. Each year thereafter ACORN chapters were established in three or more states, building to a total of 20 states represented by 1980. This expansion led to multi-state campaigns, beginning with a mass meeting of 1,000 members in Memphis in 1978. At the end of the conference, ACORN convention delegates marched on the Democratic Party conference with the outline of a nine-point "People's Platform." When ratified in 1979, this became the foundation of ACORN's platform.
ACORN was active in the 1980 Election with the "People's Platform" serving as its standard. It led demonstrations aimed at both major party candidates; demanded to meet with President Jimmy Carter; marched on the president's campaign finance committee chair's home; and presented its platform to the Republican Party platform committee.
By 1980, ACORN's staff was stretched thin by the demands of meeting its expansion goals. Much of its resources and energy had been dedicated to the presidential primaries and national party conventions. ACORN launched squatting campaigns in an attempt to obtain affordable housing, and encouraged squatters to refit the premises for comfortable living.
In June 1982, ACORN sponsored "Reagan Ranches" in Washington, DC and more than 35 other cities, in reaction to its belief that the president was focused on military as opposed to social spending. These tent cities were erected for two days on national park grounds; they were resisted by the National Park Service, which tried repeatedly to evict the tenters. The protesters remained; they marched on the White House and members testified before a Congressional committee about what they described as the housing crisis in America. The last Reagan Ranch was held at the Republican Convention in Dallas in 1984.
In addition to protesting, ACORN also developed and strengthened its political action committees and encouraged its members to run for office. For the 1984 election ACORN wanted to endorse a candidate, setting a 75% support in polls among members as its requirement. No candidate reached that level, though there was strong support for Jesse Jackson. ACORN also established a legislative office that year in Washington, DC. During this period ACORN also focused on local election reform in a number of cities, including Pittsburgh, Columbia, South Carolina, and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. They encouraged cities to change legislative bodies whose members were elected at-large to electing members by single-member district, which resulted in more participation by minorities, including women. At-large voting tends to favor candidates who can appeal to the majority and who can command more campaign funding, reducing participation by a wider variety of citizens.
By the end of Reagan's first term, ACORN operated in 27 states, adding chapters in New York City, Washington, DC, and Chicago. During the 1988 Election, ACORN held its National Convention in the same city as the Democratic Convention — Atlanta.
ACORN's membership grew to more than 70,000 in 28 states during this time. It increased its legislative lobbying efforts in Washington, DC, and strengthened its Political Action Committees (PACs). It also developed what it called the Affiliated Media Foundation Movement (AM/FM). Starting with station KNON in Dallas, AM/FM established radio stations, UHF television and cable television programming. It also sought and received appointments to the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), which was formed to dissolve the assets of failed Savings and Loans resulting from the Savings and Loan crisis.
While some of ACORN's most notable efforts were in the area of housing, it has counted health, public safety, education, representation, work and workers' rights and communications concerns among its victories. The 1990 ACORN convention in Chicago focused on the fast-breaking housing campaign. It featured a squatting demonstration at an RTC house. ACORN members demanded that banks provide loan data on low- and moderate-income communities and comply with the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). ACORN fought weakening of the CRA in 1991, staging a two-day takeover of the House Banking Committee hearing room. It established ACORN Housing Corporation to assist people in moving into homes under the housing campaign, and to rehabilitate hundreds of houses addressed by the CRA. The ACORN convention in New York in 1992, called the "ACORN-Bank Summit", was organized to make deals with giant banks. When Citibank, the nation's largest bank, did not participate, conventioneers protested at its downtown Manhattan headquarters, and won a meeting to negotiate for similar programs.
ACORN supported and lobbied for the "Motor Voter" Act, which provided for voter registration at motor vehicle bureaus. After its passage, ACORN members attended President Clinton's signing ceremony. ACORN worked for new voter registration laws in Arkansas and Massachusetts and filed suit in Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania against certain state practices as a result of the act.
In 1993, ACORN also began a national campaign to fight insurance redlining, a practice that put the gains made in other housing campaigns at risk. The campaign targeted Allstate, hitting sales offices in 14 cities and a stockholders meeting. Allstate agreed to negotiate and signed an agreement in 1994 for a $10 million partnership with ACORN and NationsBank for below-market mortgages to low-income home-buyers. Travelers Insurance agreed to a Neighborhood and Home Safety Program, linking access to insurance and lower rates to public safety programs.
ACORN has worked on supporting a "Living Wage" programs, voter registration, and grassroots political organization.
A March 27, 2003 decision of the National Labor Relations Board found that ACORN tried to thwart union organizing efforts within its own organization by laying off two workers who were trying to organize. The two workers, both field organizers with ACORN, began discussions with the Service Employees International Union and later sought to organize under Industrial Workers of the World, seeking to improve their $20,200 annual salary for a 54-hour work week. The NLRB ordered the two employees be reinstated in their former jobs and that ACORN cease from interrogating employees about organizing activity.
In 2004, Florida ACORN helped to raise Florida's minimum wage by $1.00 per hour, by lobbying for a minimum wage amendment to be placed on the ballot. Over 1 million Florida employees were affected by the raise, which is adjusted annually for inflation. That year, ACORN became an international organization, opening offices in Canada, Peru, and beginning work in Dominican Republic. Offices have subsequently been opened in Mexico and Argentina.
Until the controversies of 2008 and 2009, ACORN had an annual budget of approximately US$25 million, with approximately 10% of those funds coming from federal sources, a smaller figure from state sources, and the rest coming from supporters and membership. HUD estimated that ACORN received $42 million in federal funds since the 2000 budget year; the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee estimated that ACORN received $53 million since 1994.
ACORN was a nonpartisan organization, but its legally separate political action arm frequently endorsed causes and candidates, including the 2008 Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama. ACORN lobbied every Democratic National Convention since 1980 and had members elected as delegates to those conventions; ACORN also lobbied at Republican conventions. ACORN was criticized by Republicans for its support of Democratic candidates and for its general support of political positions that are more often favored by Democrats.
In a report released in October 2008, the U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General concluded that U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales fired U.S. Attorney David Iglesias (one of nine US attorneys removed in 2006) for political reasons after Iglesias failed to prosecute a New Mexico ACORN chapter. The report said claims that Iglesias was fired for poor performance were not credible, and the "real reason for Iglesias's removal was the complaints from New Mexico Republican politicians and party activists about how Iglesias handled voter fraud [cases]." Iglesias did not believe there was sufficient evidence to support prosecution by the government.
During the debate on the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, some commentators claimed that a draft provision (omitted in the adopted bill) to give money to funds run by the U.S. Department of the Treasury could potentially lead to money flowing to groups like ACORN. When asked how much money ACORN or other community groups would get, a spokesman for Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, said, "Absolutely none. All funds would go to state and local governments." Critics also claimed that ACORN's complex organizational structure allowed it to escape public scrutiny.
ACORN was among groups conducting voter registration drives prior to the 2008 presidential election; Republicans alleged they were responsible for voter registration fraud and had a conflict of interest. During the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary, ACORN's national political action committee, ACORN Votes, endorsed Barack Obama. Obama, with several other attorneys, had served as local counsel for ACORN more than a decade earlier in a 1995 voting rights lawsuit joined by the Justice Department and the League of Women Voters. Obama's campaign hired an ACORN affiliate for $800,000 to conduct a get-out-the-vote effort during that primary, but did not retain ACORN for the general presidential election.
Throughout the election season, supporters of Republican candidates alleged that ACORN was responsible for widespread vote fraud. In October 2008, the campaign for Republican presidential candidate John McCain released a Web-based advertisement claiming ACORN was responsible for "massive voter fraud," a point that Sen. McCain repeated in the final presidential debate. Factcheck.org called this claim "breathtakingly inaccurate," but acknowledged that ACORN had problems with phony registrations. The ads also claimed that home loan programs ACORN promoted were partly responsible for the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Newsweek and Factcheck.org also found these claims to be exaggerated and inaccurate.
A poll released in November 2009 by the Public Policy Polling organization found that 52% of Republican Party members it surveyed, and 26% of respondents overall, believed in a conspiracy theory that ACORN "stole" the election for Barack Obama. The Democratic polling organization commented that this was somewhat higher than belief in the birther conspiracy theories. (In a follow-poll in 2012, PPP found that 49% of Republicans, nearly the same percentage as in 2009, believed that ACORN had stolen the 2012 election for Obama. But by then ACORN was no longer operating.)
The New York Times reported on July 9, 2008, that Dale Rathke, the brother of ACORN's founder Wade Rathke, was found to have embezzled $948,607.50 from the group and affiliated charitable organizations in 1999 and 2000. ACORN executives decided to handle it as an internal matter, and did not inform most of the board members or law enforcement, and instead signed an enforceable restitution agreement with the Rathke family to repay the amount of the embezzlement. $210,000 has already been repaid, and a donor, Drummond Pike, has offered to pay the remaining debt. The Times reported that, according to Wade Rathke, "the decision to keep the matter secret was not made to protect his brother but because word of the embezzlement would have put a 'weapon' into the hands of enemies of ACORN, a liberal group that is a frequent target of conservatives who object to ACORN's often strident advocacy on behalf of low- and moderate-income families and workers." A whistleblower revealed the embezzlement in 2008. On June 2, 2008, Dale Rathke was dismissed, and Wade stepped down as ACORN's chief organizer, but he remains chief organizer for Acorn International L.L.C.
In September 2008, following revelations of Dale Rathke's embezzlement, two members of ACORN's national board of directors filed a lawsuit seeking to obtain financial documents and to force the organization to sever ties with Wade Rathke. ACORN's executive committee voted unanimously to remove the two, "because their actions—such as releasing a confidential legal memo to the press—were damaging the organization."
In October 2009, Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell claimed in a subpoena that ACORN's board of directors found that a larger amount—$5 million—had been embezzled from the organization. Bertha Lewis, ACORN's CEO, said the allegation is false. On November 6, following up on the subpoena, Caldwell served a search warrant at the ACORN headquarters in New Orleans. Caldwell stated, "This is an investigation of everything—Acorn, the national organization, the local organization and all of its affiliated entities."
In September 2009, conservative activists Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe publicized selectively edited hidden camera recordings through Fox News and Andrew Breitbart's website BigGovernment.com. In the videos, Giles posed as a prostitute and O'Keefe posed as her boyfriend in order to elicit damaging responses from employees of ACORN. The videos were recorded over the summer of 2009 while visiting ACORN offices in eight cities, and purported to show low-level ACORN employees in several cities providing advice to Giles and O'Keefe on how to avoid taxes and detection by the authorities with regard to their plans to engage in tax evasion, human smuggling, and child prostitution. After the videos were made public, the U.S. Congress voted to eliminate federal funding to ACORN. Although the resolutions were later nullified in a federal court ruling that the measure was an unconstitutional bill of attainder, on August 13, 2010, a federal appeals court upheld the congressional act that cut off federal funding for ACORN. In March 2010, ACORN announced it would be closing its offices and disbanding due to loss of funding from government and private donors.
On December 7, 2009, the former Massachusetts Attorney General, after an independent internal investigation of ACORN, found the videos that had been released appeared to have been edited, "in some cases substantially". He found no evidence of criminal conduct by ACORN employees, but concluded that ACORN had poor management practices that contributed to unprofessional actions by a number of its low-level employees. On March 1, 2010, the District Attorney's office for Brooklyn determined that the videos were "heavily edited" and "many of the seemingly crime-encouraging answers were taken out of context so as to appear more sinister", and concluded that there was no criminal wrongdoing by the ACORN staff in the videos from the Brooklyn ACORN office. On April 1, 2010, an investigation by the California Attorney General found the videos from Los Angeles, San Diego and San Bernardino to be "heavily edited," and the investigation did not find evidence of criminal conduct on the part of ACORN employees. On June 14, 2010, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its findings which showed that ACORN evidenced no sign that it, or any of its related organizations, mishandled any federal money they had received.
Defund ACORN Act
In late 2009, after various allegations of criminal activity due to the videos, a number of Democrats who once advertised their connections to ACORN began to distance themselves, as Republicans began to use the ACORN allegations to portray Democrats as corrupt. In immediate response to the 2009 video controversy, the United States House and Senate, by wide margins, attached amendments to pending spending legislation that would temporarily prohibit the federal government from funding ACORN, or any agency that had been involved in similar scandals — including money authorized by previous legislation. President Obama signed the bill into law on October 1.
ACORN sued the United States Government in the United States District Court in Brooklyn over the measure, known as the "Defund ACORN Act," claiming it was a bill of attainder, and therefore unconstitutional. Experts varied on the merit of the case. One argument was that while government funding choices do not generally qualify as bills of attainder, the lack of a non-punitive regulatory purpose for the legislation may give a court "sufficient basis to overcome the presumption of constitutionality." The court issued a preliminary injunction that nullified the act.
In response to an inquiry from a Housing and Urban Development Department lawyer, David Barron, the acting assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, wrote a five-page memorandum concluding that the law does not prohibit the government from paying ACORN for services already performed. On December 11, U.S. District Judge Nina Gershon issued a preliminary injunction blocking the government from enforcing its temporary spending ban, a week before it was set to expire. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) opened an investigation of ACORN in December 2009. In June 2010, the GAO released a preliminary report stating the investigation has found no sign the group or related organizations mishandled the $40 million in federal money they received from nine federal agencies.
On August 13, 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Judge Gershon's decision. The appeals court cited a study finding that only 10% of ACORN's funding came from federal sources, and stated, "We doubt that the direct consequences of the appropriations laws temporarily precluding ACORN from federal funds were so disproportionately severe or so inappropriate as to constitute punishment." The Center for Constitutional Rights, which had argued the case on ACORN's behalf, was considering a request for a rehearing by more judges of the 2nd Circuit.
On March 19, 2010, The New York Times reported that ACORN was on the verge of filing for bankruptcy; 15 of the group's 30 state chapters had disbanded over the previous six months, and other chapters (including the largest, in New York and California) renamed themselves and severed all ties to the national organization. Two unnamed ACORN officials told the Times that the following weekend, a teleconference was planned to discuss a bankruptcy filing; "private donations from foundations to Acorn [had] all but evaporated," and the federal government had distanced itself from the group. "[L]ong before the activist videos delivered what may become the final blow, the organization was dogged for years by financial problems and accusations of fraud." "That 20-minute video ruined 40 years of good work," said Sonja Merchant-Jones, former co-chairwoman of ACORN's recently closed Maryland chapter. "But if the organization had confronted its own internal problems, it might not have been taken down so easily."
On March 22, 2010, National ACORN spokesman Kevin Whelan says the organization's board decided to close remaining state affiliates and field offices by April 1 because of falling revenues. Other national operations continued operating for another several weeks before shutting for good. On April 20, ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis reported that ACORN was "still alive. We're limping along. We're on life support." Lewis said that ACORN's annual budget had been reduced from $25 million to $4 million, and that its staff of 350 to 600 people had been reduced to four. Lewis explained the controversies had left a stain on ACORN, "sort of like a scarlet letter," forcing the group to spend money defending itself against "one investigation after another."
Some chapters continued operations by severing ties with the national organization:
- Members and staff of California ACORN founded a new organization, the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment.
- New York ACORN founded New York Communities for Change.
- A Milwaukee offshoot of ACORN called Acorn Housing changed its name to Affordable Housing Centers of America yet has retained the same tax and employee identification numbers that it held under its former name.
- Rutenberg, Jim (October 7, 2009). "Acorn Chief Denounces Air of 'McCarthyism'". The Politics and Government Blog of the Times (The New York Times). Retrieved 2009-10-07.
- "Did ACORN get too big for its own good?". MSNBC. 2009-09-19.
- Michael B. Farrell (2009-09-16). "What is the ACORN controversy about?". Christian Science Monitor.
- "Who is ACORN? (organization homepage)". Retrieved 2009-09-15.
- What does ACORN do?, ACORN, retrieved 2010-12-03
- Walls, David (Summer 1994). "Power to the People: Thirty-five Years of Community Organizing". The Workbook. Archived from the original on 15 November 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- ACORN filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy; Los Angeles Times; November 2, 2010
- "January 13th Statement" (Press release). Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment. January 13, 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
The leadership and staff that were working with ACORN in California made the decision to break off from ACORN and launch a new organization here in California called Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE).
- "Report of the Attorney General on the activities of ACORN" (PDF). April 1, 2010.
- Urbina, Ian (March 19, 2010). "Acorn on Brink of Bankruptcy, Officials Say". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-20.
- "Second Video Shows ACORN Officials Helping 'Pimp,' 'Prostitute' in Washington Office". Fox News. September 11, 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-11.
- Ryan Grim (September 27, 2008). "ACORN Issue Fueling Bailout Opposition". CBS News.
- "ACORN Closing in Wake of Scandal". FOX News. March 22, 2010. Archived from the original on 25 March 2010. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
- "New Report Finds Widespread Local Use of Affordable Housing Program Being Currently Debated in Congress". ACORN (press release). 2002-07-23.
- "ACORN Annual Report 2003". ACORN. 2003. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- "Household Finance Settlement". Washington State Office of the Attorney General. 2003-12-05. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- "Affordable Housing". ACORN. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- "Clinton calls for $30 billion in mortgage aid to home-owners". Mcclatchydc.com. 2008-03-24. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- "Two years after Katrina, still fighting and winning". ACORN. 2005. Archived from the original on 27 October 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- "School Overview". ACORN. Archived from the original on 27 October 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- "Detailed History of ACORN:New Victories, 1995–2002". ACORN. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- Mark Walsh (2001-03-14). "N.Y.C. Parents To Vote on Edison Charter Plan". Education Week.
- Christopher Hayes, The Nation, September 1, 2008, Obama's Voter-registration Drive
- Hastings, Deborah (2008-10-18). "ACORN controversy: Voter fraud or mudslinging?". USA Today. Associated Press.
- "Furor over ACORN allegations gaining momentum"[dead link] Miami Herald, 2008-10-24.
- Falcone, Michael; Moss, Michael (2008-10-23). "Groups Tally of New Voters Was Vastly Overstated". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-03-27.
- "ACORN Workers Indicted For Alleged Voter Fraud". KMBC=TV. 2006-11-01.
- Ervin, Keith (2007-07-28). "Felony charges filed against 7 in state's biggest case of voter-registration fraud". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 17 November 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- Strom, Stephanie (2008-10-22). "Acorn Report Raises Issues of Legality". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
- Sheffield, Reggie. "Former temp worker accused of bogus registrations", The Patriot-News (Harrisburg, Penn.), July 24, 2008
- Bill Dolan (2008-10-02). "County rejects large number of invalid voter registrations". The Times Media Company.
- Bill Dolan (2008-10-23). "ACORN defends fraudulent Lake voter drive". The Times Media Company.
- Hiram Soto and Helen Gao (October 16, 2008). "ACORN active in voter registration in county". San Diego Union-Tribune.
- Rachel La Corte (2007-02-23). "Reform group turned in 2000 suspicious voter registrations: County may make criminal inquiry". Seattle Post Intelligencer. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- Vote Sign-up Fraud Probed; Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, August 7, 2008
- Roddy, Dennis B. (2009-05-08). "7 ACORN workers charged with forgery". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
- Friess, Steve (May 5, 2009). "Acorn Charged in Voter Registration Fraud Case in Nevada". The New York Times. Retrieved March 7, 2012.
- McCoy, Cara (November 23, 2009). "Ex-ACORN official gets probation for voter registration plan". Las Vegas Sun. Archived from the original on 11 June 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- ACORN pleads guilty to felony compensation for registration of voters; Las Vegas Journal-Review; April 6, 2011
- McCabe, Francis (2011-08-10). "Judge fines ACORN $5000 for voter registration scheme". Las Vegas Review-Journal. Retrieved 2011-08-12.
- Harkless v. Brunner, ___ F.3d ___ (United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit October 28, 2008).
- "Federal Court Lawsuit Settlement Brings Ohio into Compliance with NVRA". Talking Points Memo. December 1, 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-13.
- "Federal Court Lawsuit Settlement Brings Ohio Into Compliance with National Voter Registration Act-Hundreds of Thousands of Low-Income Ohioans to Benefit" (Press release). The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. November 30, 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-13.
- "Federal Court Lawsuit Settlement Brings Ohio Into Compliance with National Voter Registration Act" (Press release). Project Vote. Retrieved 2009-12-13.
- "Editorial: ACORN suit gets good result for Ohio voters". Dayton Daily News (Dayton, Ohio). December 10, 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-14.
- Toutant, Charles (2006-12-20). "N.J. Judge Voids City's Gun Control Law". New Jersey Law Journal. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- "Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, No. A-4443-06T2 and A-4708-06T2" (PDF). September 29, 2008.[dead link]
- "ACORN Home Defender Program".
- Bill Dolan (2009-02-19). "ACORN plans local action to stem NWI mortgage foreclosures". The Times Media Company.
- "Refusing to Leave: ACORN Members Step up Fight to Stay in Homes". 2009-02-13.
- Stern, Sol (Spring 2003). "ACORN's Nutty Regime for Cities". City Journal. Archived from the original on 27 January 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-24.
- Delgado, Gary (1986). Organizing the Movement: The Roots and Growth of ACORN. Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-393-9. OCLC 12134922 59256995.
- ACORN History acorn.org
- "Western Historical Manuscript Collection". University of Missouri – St. Louis. June 1980. Archived from the original on 29 September 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
- [dead link]
- ACORN affiliates rebrand after video scandal; MSNBC; March 15, 2010
- "Decisions of the NLRB, 338–129" (PDF). National Labor Relations Board. 2003-03-27. Retrieved 2006-10-12.
- Willamette Week | "The ACORN that imploded"|March 6th, 2002.
- Williamson, Elizabeth; Mullins, Brody (July 31, 2008). "Democratic Ally Mobilizes In Housing Crunch". The Wall Street Journal.
- Katrina vanden Heuvel (2008-02-23). "ACORN: Obama Gets It". The Nation.
- "ACORN's Political Action Committee Endorses Obama" (Press release). ACORN. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- "Detailed History of ACORN: The ACORN 80 Plan". ACORN. Archived from the original on 5 December 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General. "An Investigation into the Removal of Nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006, pp. 156–167, 190" (PDF).
- "Draft bill". U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 8 November 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- Peter Overby. "ACORN Has Long Been In Republicans' Cross Hairs". Archived from the original on 5 December 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-03.
- Stephanie Strom (2008-10-08). "On Obama, Acorn and Voter Registration". The New York Times.
- Barabak, Mark Z.; Seema Mehta (2008-10-16). "McCain, Obama duel in caustic debate finale". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 19 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-17.
- David M. Brown (2008-08-22). "Obama to amend report on $800,000 in spending". Pittsburgh Tribune Review.
- Bill Draper (2008-10-08). "Missouri officials suspect fake voter registration". Associated Press.[dead link]
- Novak, Viveca (2008-10-31). "The Whoppers of 2008 – The Sequel". factcheck.org. Archived from the original on 22 January 2009. Retrieved 2009-01-23.
- Jess Henig (2008-10-18). "ACORN Accusations". Newsweek.[dead link]
- "Public Policy Polling: ACORN". Publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com. 2009-11-19. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- Jensen, Tom (December 4, 2012), Republicans not handling election results well, Public Policy Polling, retrieved December 21, 2013
- Strom, Stephanie (July 9, 2008). "Funds Misappropriated at 2 Nonprofit Groups". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 30 September 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-13.
- Strom, Stephanie (2008-08-17). "Head of Foundation Bailed Out Nonprofit Group After Its Funds Were Embezzled". The New York Times.
- Strom, Stephanie (2008-09-12). "Lawsuit Adds to Turmoil for Community Group". The New York Times. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- "Ousted ACORN members seek federal criminal investigation – Pittsburgh Tribune-Review". Pittsburghlive.com. 2009-01-08. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- "La. prosecutor probes ACORN after $5 million embezzlement". StAugustine.com. 2009-10-07. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- Carr, Martha (2009-11-06). "State investigators taking dozens of computers from ACORN office on Canal Street". New Orleans Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on 8 November 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
- "Acorn offices in New Orleans Are Raided". The New York Times. 2009-11-06. Archived from the original on 10 November 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-10.
- California AG Determines ACORN Broke No Criminal Laws FOX News; April 1, 2010
- Fake pimp from ACORN videos tries to 'punk' CNN correspondent CNN; September 29, 2009
- "Brown Releases Report Detailing a Litany of Problems with ACORN, But No Criminality". California Office of Attorney General. 2010-04-01. Archived from the original on 3 April 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-03.
- According to the California Attorney General's investigation report, page 8, the recordings occurred in ACORN offices in eight cities: Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., Brooklyn, Miami, Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Bernardino.
- Shane, Scott (2009-09-19). "A Political Gadfly Lampoons the Left via YouTube". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-09-26.
- Lorber, Janie (December 11, 2009). "House Ban on Acorn Grants Is Ruled Unconstitutional". The New York Times. p. A12. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
- Taylor, Andrew (2009-09-14). "Senate votes to deny funds to ACORN". Associated Press. Retrieved 2009-09-15.[dead link]
- "House Votes to Strip Funding for ACORN". Fox News. 2009-09-17. Retrieved 2009-09-17.
- Hays, Tom. Federal appeals court in NY rules against ACORN. Associated Press, August 13, 2010.
- "ACORN disbanding because of money woes, scandal". Associated Press.
- Scott Harshbarger and Amy Crafts (2009-12-07). An Independent Governance Assessment of ACORN: The Path To Meaningful Reform (PDF) (Report). Proskauer.
- James, Frank (2009-12-07). "ACORN Workers Cleared Of Illegality By Outside Probe". Npr.org. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- ACORN and the Ethics of Leadership, Atlantic Monthly, Dec. 8, 2009
- ACORN Investigation Results, The Nonprofit Quarterly
- Damaging Brooklyn ACORN Sting Video Ruled 'Heavily Edited,' No Charges to Be Filed New York Magazine; March 2, 2010
- Newman, Andrew (2010-03-01). "Advice to Fake Pimp Was No Crime, Prosecutor Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-07.
- Madde, Mike (2010-03-01). "Brooklyn prosecutors clear local ACORN office". Salon.com. Archived from the original on 7 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-07.
- ACORN Vindicated of Wrongdoing by the Congressional Watchdog Office Huffington Post; June 15, 2010; John Atlas
- "Preliminary report clears ACORN on funds". CNN. 2010-06-15.
- Sharon Theimer and Pete Yost (2009-09-19). "Did ACORN get too big for its own good?". MSNBC. Associated Press.
- Charlie Savage (2009-11-27). "Justice Department Says Acorn Can Be Paid for Pre-Ban Contracts". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 December 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-03.
- Kareem Fahim (November 12, 2009). "Acorn Sues Over Funding Vote in House". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 15 November 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-13.
- Kenneth R. Thomas. "The proposed "Defund ACORN Act": Is it a "Bill of Attainder?"" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 November 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-14.
- Hans von Spokavsky (September 27, 2009). "Defunding ACORN: Necessary and Proper, and Certainly Constitutional". Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on 12 November 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-13.
- Merchant, Nomaan (December 12, 2009). "Judge Blocks U.S. Ban on Funding for Acorn". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 15 December 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-12.
- Jake Sherman (December 17, 2009). "GAO Opens ACORN Investigation". Politico.com. Retrieved 2009-12-17.
- Preliminary report clears ACORN on funds, CNN; June 14, 2010
- Hays, Tom. "Federal appeals court in NY rules against ACORN"[dead link]. Associated Press (via KTUU-TV Alaska), August 13, 2010.
- Smith, Ben (March 22, 2010). "ACORN Folds". Politico.com. Archived from the original on 25 March 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
- Larry Neumeister (2010-04-20). "ACORN CEO outside court: 'We're on life support'". Associated Press.[dead link]
- "Milwaukee chosen to pilot program aimed at foreclosures". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 2010-06-28. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- "An ACORN by Any Other Name Still Smells Like an ACORN Critics Say". Foxnews.com. 2010-04-07. Retrieved 2011-05-12.
- Delgado, Gary (1986). Organizing the Movement: The Roots and Growth of ACORN. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-393-9. OCLC 12134922 59256995.
- Swarts, Heidi J. (2008). Organizing Urban America: Secular and Faith-based Progressive Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-4839-9.
- Atlas, John (2010). Seeds of Change: The Story of ACORN, America's Most Controversial Antipoverty Community Organizing Group. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. ISBN 978-0-8265-1705-0.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to ACORN.|