Category:C-Class Food and drink articles
Appearance
![]() | Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | B | C | Start | Stub | ![]() | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | ![]() | File | Portal | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? |
52 | 2 | 382 | 1,291 | 4,741 | 16,098 | 13,715 | 4 | 960 | 7,986 | 162 | 195 | 139 | 3,008 | 614 | 386 | 3,377 | 979 | 243 | 2,026 |
- Project home - WikiProject Food and drink
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Food and drink articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).
Pages in category "C-Class Food and drink articles"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 4,741 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)P
- Talk:Poached egg
- Talk:Poaching (cooking)
- Talk:Poblano
- Talk:Poisoned candy myths
- Talk:Poland Spring
- Talk:Polaris drinking water
- Talk:Polenta
- Talk:Polish Boy
- Talk:Polkagris
- Talk:Michael Pollan
- Talk:Pollo Campestre
- Talk:Pollo Tropical
- Talk:Erika Polmar
- Talk:Polo (confectionery)
- Talk:Polvorón
- Talk:POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co.
- Talk:Pomace
- Talk:Pomegranate
- Talk:Pomegranate juice
- Talk:Pomelo
- Talk:Ponty vineyards
- Talk:Poodle Dog Restaurants
- Talk:Poon choi
- Talk:Pop Cola Panthers
- Talk:Pop out cake
- Talk:Poppy seed paste
- Talk:Por Que No
- Talk:Sam Porcello
- Talk:Pork
- Talk:Pork in Pakistan
- Talk:Pork knuckles and ginger stew
- Talk:Port wine
- Talk:Portuguese cuisine
- Talk:Portuguese wine
- Talk:Portulaca oleracea
- Talk:Post Holdings
- Talk:Pot Noodle
- Talk:Potassium benzoate
- Talk:Potassium iodate
- Talk:Potato masher
- Talk:Potato pancake
- Talk:Isaiah L. Potts
- Talk:Pouligny-Saint-Pierre cheese
- Talk:Pouteria sapota
- Talk:Julie Powell
- Talk:Powerade
- Talk:Powerade Tigers
- Talk:Nora Pöyhönen
- Talk:Pozharsky cutlet
- Talk:Pozol
- Talk:James Norwood Pratt
- Talk:Prawn
- Talk:Prawn soup
- Talk:Pre-ferment
- Talk:Jessica Prentice
- Talk:President's Choice
- Talk:Presidential M&M's
- Talk:Pressure cooking
- Talk:Pretzelmaker
- Talk:Preventive nutrition
- Talk:Prezzo (restaurant)
- Talk:Prime (drink)
- Talk:Princess (food)
- Talk:Prison food
- Talk:Processed meat
- Talk:Procter & Gamble
- Talk:Production of peaches in California
- Talk:Prohibition against slaughtering an animal and its offspring on the same day
- Talk:Prohibition in the United States
- Talk:Project Wasteless
- Talk:Propionibacterium freudenreichii
- Talk:Propylthiouracil
- Talk:Prosecco
- Talk:Proso millet
- Talk:Protandim
- Talk:Protein adulteration in China
- Talk:Protein digestibility corrected amino acid score
- Talk:ProVeg Deutschland
- Talk:ProVeg Incubator
- Talk:ProVeg International
- Talk:ProVeg Nederland
- Talk:Proximo Spirits
- Talk:Prunus
- Talk:Prunus armeniaca
- Talk:Prunus avium
- Talk:Prunus salicina
- Talk:Psychology of eating meat
- Talk:Psyllium
- Talk:Public Kitchen & Bar
- Talk:Pudding
- Talk:Pueblito Viejo
- Talk:Manuel María Puga y Parga
- Talk:Pumpkin pie
- Talk:Pumpkin-coconut custard
- Talk:Pumpkinseed
- Talk:Pungency
- Talk:Punk Chef
- Talk:Purchase for Progress
- Talk:PureCircle
- Talk:Puri (food)
- Talk:Andrew Puzder
- Talk:Pyanse
- Talk:Pyeonsu
- Talk:Pyura chilensis
Q
- Talk:Qamar al-Din
- Talk:Quaglino's
- Talk:Quaker Oats Company
- Talk:Quality Street (confectionery)
- Talk:Duchess Quamino
- Talk:Quanjude
- Talk:Quarter Pounder
- Talk:Quebec Maple Syrup Producers
- Talk:Queen Elizabeth cake
- Talk:Queen's Arms, Cowden Pound
- Talk:Queimada (drink)
- Talk:Quick bread
- Talk:QuickChek
- Talk:Quince
- Talk:Quince cheese
- Talk:Quinine
- Talk:Quinoa
- Talk:Quisisana
- Talk:Quorn
- Talk:Imtiaz Qureshi
R
- Talk:Rabbit stew
- Talk:Racism in the wine industry
- Talk:Radar (restaurant)
- Talk:Radiant Radish
- Talk:Radico Khaitan
- Talk:Hans Raffert
- Talk:Ragú
- Talk:Rainbow Foods
- Talk:Raised Doughnuts
- Talk:Raisin bread
- Talk:Raisin cake
- Talk:Ramen
- Talk:Ramen shop
- Talk:Ramen Street
- Talk:Rami Levy Hashikma Marketing
- Talk:Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares
- Talk:Ranch
- Talk:Rangoon Bistro
- Talk:Rapeseed
- Talk:Rappie pie
- Talk:Rasgulla
- Talk:Rasna (drink)
- Talk:Raspberry
- Talk:Leanne Ratcliffe
- Talk:Rationing in the United Kingdom
- Talk:Ratner's
- Talk:Raviole du Dauphiné
- Talk:Raw bar
- Talk:Raw foodism
- Talk:Wilhelmina Rawson
- Talk:Reading Brewing Company
- Talk:Real Ale Brewing Company
- Talk:Manuel Joaquim Machado Rebelo
- Talk:Recipe
- Talk:Recipes from the Garden of Contentment
- Talk:Reckitt
- Talk:Red Barn (restaurant)
- Talk:Red bean paste
- Talk:Red Bull GmbH
- Talk:Red Cross parcel
- Talk:Red Delicious
- Talk:The Red Onion
- Talk:Red Stripe
- Talk:Red wine
- Talk:Red's Eats
- Talk:Orville Redenbacher
- Talk:René Redzepi
- Talk:Reefton Distilling Co.
- Talk:H. B. Reese
- Talk:Reese's Take 5
- Talk:Refrigerator
- Talk:Iliana Regan
- Talk:Regional variations of barbecue
- Talk:Regulation of food and dietary supplements by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Talk:Ruth Reichl
- Talk:Peter Reinhart
- Talk:Reisenweber's Cafe
- Talk:Rose Reisman
- Talk:Relentless (drink)
- Talk:Religious restrictions on the consumption of pork
- Talk:Relish
- Talk:Rendering (animal products)
- Talk:Research Institute of Brewing and Malting
- Talk:Restaurant
- Talk:Restaurant Brands International
- Talk:Restaurant rating
- Talk:Rethink Food
- Talk:Revere Ware
- Talk:Rhamphospermum nigrum
- Talk:Rheintaler Ribelmais
- Talk:Rhododendron subsect. Ledum
- Talk:Ribena
- Talk:Rice as food
- Talk:Dominica Rice-Cisneros
- Talk:Ricinodendron
- Talk:Rickey (cocktail)