|This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
United States IRS exemption status: 501(c)(3) under the name "The Clear Fund." EIN/Tax ID: 20-8625442
|20 full-time who work primarily on GiveWell; 40 full-time including staff on the Open Philanthropy Project. This does not include contract workers such as conversation notes writers.|
GiveWell is an American non-profit charity evaluator and effective altruism-focused organization. Unlike any other charity evaluators, GiveWell focuses primarily on the cost-effectiveness of the organizations that it evaluates, rather than traditional metrics such as the percentage of the organization's budget that is spent on overhead. GiveWell recommends several charities per year. In 2015, its top recommendations were the Against Malaria Foundation, GiveDirectly, the Schistosomiasis Control Initiative, and the Deworm the World Initiative. GiveWell moved over $100 million to its top charities in 2015.
- 1 Principles for selecting charities
- 2 Evaluation process
- 3 Recommendations
- 4 The Open Philanthropy Project
- 5 Reception and impact
- 5.1 Money moved
- 5.2 Partnerships with philanthropies and use by other charity recommenders
- 5.3 Reception of GiveWell's 2013 recommendations
- 5.4 Reception of GiveWell's 2012 recommendations
- 6 Media coverage
- 7 History
- 8 See also
- 9 References
- 10 External links
Principles for selecting charities
Focus on developing world charities
Though GiveWell does not explicitly focus on recommending international charities, most of its top recommendations have been for organizations that work in the developing world. GiveWell argues that the best charities working in the developing world are far more cost-effective than the best charities in the developed world. However, GiveWell has previously recommended some charities in the US, including KIPP (Houston branch) and Nurse-Family Partnership.
Room for more funding
One of the key ways that GiveWell seeks to distinguish itself from other charity evaluators is through its focus on scalability, which it calls "room for more funding" — how much additional funding the charity can use, the activities that additional funding will be used for, and how well the effect of current funding can be extrapolated for additional funding. GiveWell has published a guide on room for more funding and has a number of blog posts on the topic.
Heuristics to identify outstanding charities
Unlike other charity evaluators such as Charity Navigator, GuideStar, Philanthropedia and Great Nonprofits, GiveWell is not focused on rating large numbers of charities. Rather, GiveWell focuses on identifying outstanding charities that are proven, cost-effective, scalable, and transparent. It performs detailed reviews only for those charities that, based on its preliminary investigations, hold clear promise of being outstanding. Its 2011 international aid process review explains, "Our focus is on finding outstanding charities rather than completing an in-depth investigation for each organization we consider. For that reason, we rely on heuristics, or meaningful shortcuts, to distinguish between organizations and identify ones that we think will ultimately qualify for our recommendations."
Evidence of impact
GiveWell believes that the burden of proof for establishing success should fall on the charity. For this reason, when charities do not clearly disclose information or provide evidence that their programs are having the desired positive impact, GiveWell does not assume that the charity is effective. Charities that do not provide data indicating positive impact rarely receive a full review from GiveWell.
Though some charity evaluators give negative ratings to charities that spend a large fraction of their budgets on administrative expenses and fundraising, GiveWell does not consider this a good metric for evaluation, because it argues that overhead spending can make an organization more effective in accomplishing its goals.
Identifying candidate charities
GiveWell uses a number of sources to identify candidate charities for further investigation and rating. It accepts candidates for evaluation from charities, donors, and others. In addition, GiveWell considers organizations that receive grants from impact-focused foundations and grantmaking bodies such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Mulago Foundation, Skoll Foundation, Jasmine Social Investments, and Peery Foundation. It considers charities that are participating jointly with the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab and Innovations for Poverty Action in the evaluation of their programs. GiveWell also considers domain-specific charity lists, winners of various awards, and lists of charities highlighted by other charity evaluators and donor groups.
To be eligible for evaluation from GiveWell, charities must perform a program that GiveWell believes has strong evidence of success (such as salt iodization) or must perform rigorous evaluations of its impact.
Investigating and rating charities
There are several ways in which GiveWell seeks evidence of cost-effectiveness and positive impact for charities. GiveWell has conversations with charity staff members and experts in relevant fields. Notes from these conversations are posted on its website.
Since 2011, GiveWell staff have been performing site visits for all potential top-rated charities and posting, where possible, audio and photographs of their visits.
GiveWell also uses external sources to evaluate philanthropic interventions (for example, microfinance). These include:
- The Cochrane Collaboration
- Innovations for Poverty Action
- Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab
- Millions Saved: Proven Successes in Global Health
- The Disease Control Priorities Project
- Copenhagen Consensus
GiveWell regularly publishes updates on the activities of all current and past top-rated charities.
GiveWell provides detailed reviews of each of its top-rated charities as well as other standout charities. It also lists reasons for rejecting other charities. GiveWell's top recommended charities at end-of-year are given in the table below. Until 2015, the list of recommended charities was refreshed annually, usually in late November. Starting 2016, the refresh frequency changed to twice a year, in June and November.
|2016 (official list released November 28)||Top charities: Against Malaria Foundation, Schistosomiasis Control Initiative, END Fund, Malaria Consortium, Sightsavers, Deworm the World Initiative, GiveDirectly.
Charities worthy of special recognition (previously called "standout charities"): Development Media International, Food Fortification Initiative, Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Iodine Global Network, Living Goods, Project Healthy Children.
GiveWell expects Good Ventures to give $50 million to top charities at the following grant amounts: AMF ($15.1 million), DtWI ($4.5 million), END Fund ($5.0 million), GiveDirectly ($2.5 million), Malaria Consortium ($5.0 million), SCI ($13.5 million), Sightsavers ($3.0 million), charities worthy of special recognition ($1.5 million). Its recommendation to donors is to split their donation among AMF (75%) and SCI (25%).
|mid-2016||No change in list of top charities from 2015. Updates to room for more funding estimates at various execution levels. GiveWell did not recommend that Good Ventures make any mid-year grants.|
|2015 (official list released November 20, 2015)||Top charities: Against Malaria Foundation, Schistosomiasis Control Initiative, Deworm the World Initiative, and GiveDirectly.
Standout charities: Development Media International, Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition's Universal Salt Iodization Program, Iodine Global Network (formerly International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders), Living Goods.
GiveWell recommended that Good Ventures make end-of-year grants to AMF ($22.8 million), DtWI ($10.8 million), GiveDirectly ($9.8 million; this was separate from the three-year $25 million grant made in August), and SCI ($1 million), plus $250,000 each to each of the standout charities. Their recommendation to donors was to give money at the current margin to AMF, but they provided a more detailed comparison to address donors who had other goals.
|2014 (Official list released December 1, 2014)||Top charities: Against Malaria Foundation, Deworm the World Initiative, GiveDirectly, Schistosomiasis Control Initiative.
Standout charities: Development Media International, Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition's Universal Salt Iodization Program, International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders, Living Goods.
Good Ventures made grants of $5 million each to GiveDirectly and AMF, $3 million to SCI, and $250,000 to Deworm the World Initiative and to each of the standout charities.
Taking into account the money already allocated by Good Ventures, GiveWell's recommended optimal giving allocation was: $5 to AMF (67%), $1 to SCI (13%), $1 to GiveDirectly (13%) and $.50 to DtWI (7%) for every $7.50 given.
|2013 (official list released December 1, 2013)||Top charities: GiveDirectly ($2.5M target), Schistosomiasis Control Initiative ($1M target), Deworm the World Initiative ($2M target). GiveWell did not provide numerical rankings in 2013. Instead it set minimum targets of the amounts it would like to see each charity raise, and recommended that donors fund each charity to the minimum target before donating in excess of the targets. On December 20, 2013, GiveWell published another blog post stating that for donors who "have a high degree of trust/alignment" with GiveWell, they recommended donating to GiveWell itself, until GiveWell was able to raise $850,000 in additional revenue.|
|2012 (official list released November 26, 2012)||Against Malaria Foundation (#1), GiveDirectly (#2), Schistosomiasis Control Initiative (#3). GiveWell recommended a donation ratio of 7:2:1 to these three charities. GiveWell also published additional blog posts explaining how it ranked its top charities. Against Malaria Foundation was removed from the list of top-rated charities on November 26, 2013 due to issues related to room for more funding.|
|2011 (official list released November 29, 2011)||Top charities: Against Malaria Foundation (#1) and Schistosomiasis Control Initiative (#2). GiveWell also identified six standout organizations: GiveDirectly, Innovations for Poverty Action, KIPP (Houston branch), Nyaya Health, Pratham, and Small Enterprise Foundation. GiveWell discontinued identification of standout organizations the next year (2012).|
|2010||VillageReach was the top recommended charity, and one of only two getting a Gold rating. The other top-rated overall charities were Stop TB Partnership (#2), Against Malaria Foundation (#3), Small Enterprise Foundation (#4), Village Enterprise (#5), and Chamroeun (#6) -- all of these were given a Silver rating. The top-rated recommended United States charities were KIPP and Nurse-Family Partnership, both getting Gold ratings. In late November 2011 (the next year), GiveWell indicated that it believed that both VillageReach and the Nurse-Family Partnership are still outstanding but have limited room for more funding; hence, it did not advise donors to give to them.|
|2009||VillageReach was the top-rated charity. Other top charities were the Stop TB Partnership (#2), Nurse-Family Partnership (#3), KIPP (#4), Against Malaria Foundation (#5), Population Services International (#6), Partners in Health (#7), the Global Fund (#8), Teach for America (#9), and Pratham (#10).|
|2008||The top charities in "International aid" were Population Services International and Partners in Health. Top charities in the US included KIPP, the Nurse-Family Partnership, and the HOPE program for employment assistance in New York City.|
The reporting of room for more funding using execution levels
Starting with its 2015 recommendations, GiveWell provided a more granular breakdown of its estimate of charities' room for more funding by breaking it down into execution levels. GiveWell defined the following three execution levels:
- Execution Level 1: The amount of funds needed to achieve a 50%+ probability of not being bottlenecked for funds over the next year.
- Execution Level 2: The amount of funds needed to achieve an 80%+ probability of not being bottlenecked for funds over the next year.
- Execution Level 3: The amount of funds needed to achieve a 95%+ probability of not being bottlenecked for funds over the next year.
Mid-2016 funding gaps for top charities
In its blog post with a mid-2016 charity refresh, GiveWell estimated funding gaps for its top charities. These funding gaps (in millions of US dollars) are below. The funding gaps up to a later execution level are cumulative, i.e., they include the funding gaps up to earlier execution levels.
|Organization||Funding gap up to Execution Level 1||Funding gap up to Execution Level 2||Funding gap up to Execution Level 3|
|Against Malaria Foundation||11.3||18.6||29.1|
|Schistosomiasis Control Initiative||10.1||10.1||10.1|
|Deworm the World Initiative||0||0||6.0|
2015 funding gaps for top charities (along with comparison with actual money moved)
In its blog post announcing its 2015 top charities, GiveWell estimated funding gaps for each of its top charities. These funding gaps (in millions of US dollars) are below. Funding gaps already take into account the funds recommended for Good Ventures to donate. The funding gaps up to a later execution level are cumulative, i.e., they include the funding gaps up to earlier execution levels.
|Organization||Funding by Good Ventures||Funding gap up to Execution Level 1||Funding gap up to Execution Level 2||Funding gap up to Execution Level 3||Actual money moved excluding Good Ventures, and position relative to funding gaps|
|Against Malaria Foundation||22.8||27.5||51.4||75.4||15.45 (56.2% of Execution Level 1 funding gap)|
|GiveDirectly||9.8||24.8||45.7||74.3||19.36 (78.1% of Execution Level 1 funding gap)|
|Schistosomiasis Control Initiative||1.0||4.9||16.5||25.3||2.66 (54.2% of Execution Level 1 funding gap)|
|Deworm the World Initiative||10.8||0||3.2||8.2||1.08 (33.7% of Execution Level 2 funding gap)|
|Total||44.4||57.2||116.8||183.2||38.55 (67.39% of Execution Level 1 funding gap)|
Guidelines for donations
Criticisms of charities
GiveWell generally does not focus on providing negative feedback to charities. However, GiveWell has sometimes criticized popular charities, including Kiva, Grameen Foundation, Heifer International, Smile Train, UNICEF, Acumen Fund, the Robin Hood Foundation, the Millennium Villages Project, the Worldwide Fistula Fund, and the Carter Center.
GiveWell has not listed any disaster relief charities as top recommendations and has made general arguments against donating to disaster relief. However, GiveWell publishes analyses of disaster relief efforts and recommendations within the disaster relief category after major disasters, including the 2010 Haiti earthquake, the 2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami, and the East Africa/Somalia famine. In addition, GiveWell has a blog category devoted to disaster relief. Among the charities that GiveWell has recommended in the context of disaster relief are Doctors without Borders, Partners in Health, and Direct Relief.
The Open Philanthropy Project
The Open Philanthropy Project started out as a collaboration between GiveWell and Good Ventures (a philanthropic organization co-founded by Cari Tuna and her husband Dustin Moskovitz, one of the co-founders of Facebook) that tries to identify the most effective ways to give money to a wide variety of causes. The project identifies important and neglected problems and tries to fund tractable approaches to solve those problems. The project conducts analysis and data collection. As of 2016, it is still not entirely separate from GiveWell, but there are plans to make it a separate organization.
The name was changed to Open Philanthropy Project in August 2014 to separate it from GiveWell and also to avoid exclusive association to GiveWell since it is a collaboration with Good Ventures. However even after this initial brand change, updates to Open Phil were still posted to the GiveWell blog.
In April 2015, Open Phil announced a partnership with Kaitlyn Trigger and Mike Krieger (co-founder of Instagram). Trigger and Krieger pledged $750,000 over two years while Open Phil would provide information and include Trigger in team meetings.
In September 2015, Holden Karnofsky announced on the GiveWell blog that it would launch a separate website for Open Phil by the end of 2015. By February 2016, updates to Open Phil were posted to the Open Phil blog rather than the GiveWell blog (as was previously done).
As of March 2016, the Open Philanthropy Project is not an independent organization i.e. it is still a collaboration between GiveWell and Good Ventures, who share office space and information (to an extent). However Open Phil is in the process of becoming an independent organization.
Reception and impact
Around February of every year, GiveWell publishes a complete self-evaluation in a series of blog posts. In addition, GiveWell publishes quarterly reports (in the form of blog posts) about its web traffic and money moved. They also provide an updated summary of their money moved statistics on their Impact page.
|Year||Money moved in USD at current prices (not adjusted for inflation)||Additional notes|
|2007–2009||total 1.2 million|
|2011||5.3 million||Excluding funding by Good Ventures and money committed to the Open Philanthropy Project, the money moved was $3.3 million.|
|2012||9.5 million||Excluding funding by Good Ventures, the money moved was $5.8 million.|
|2013||17.36 million||Excluding Good Ventures, total funding was $8.1 million.|
|2014||28 million||Excluding Good Ventures, total funding was $12.7 million.|
|2015||110.1 million||Excluding Good Ventures, money moved attributable to GiveWell was a little under $40 million, with over half of it coming from donors who each gave $1 million or more.
GiveWell estimated an additional $7–10 million in donations with uncertain attribution that it may have influenced, and $4.8 million in grants it partially influenced.
Money moved to top charities from Good Ventures
Below are the details of the money moved to GiveWell top charities, mostly at GiveWell's recommendation (with the exception of $5 million out of the $7 million granted to GiveDirectly in 2013).
|Organization||December 23, 2011 (top charities)||August 6, 2012 (standouts)||December 28, 2012 (top charities)||December 3, 2013 (end-of-year)||December 1, 2014 (end-of-year)||August 3, 2015 (one-off)||November 20, 2015 (end-of-year)||Total|
|Against Malaria Foundation||500,000||--||1,250,000||--||5,000,000||--||22,800,000||29,550,000|
|Schistosomiasis Control Initiative||250,000||--||250,000||750,000||3,000,000||--||1,000,000||5,250,000|
|Deworm the World Initiative||--||--||--||1,500,000||250,000||--||10,800,000||12,550,000|
|KIPP (Houston branch)||--||50,000||--||--||--||--||--||50,000|
|Small Enterprise Foundation||--||50,000||--||--||--||--||--||50,000|
|Innovations for Poverty Action||--||50,000||--||--||--||--||--||50,000|
|Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition's Universal Salt Iodization Program||--||--||--||--||250,000||--||250,000||500,000|
|Development Media International||--||--||--||--||250,000||--||250,000||500,000|
|Iodine Global Network (formerly International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders)||--||--||--||--||250,000||--||250,000||500,000|
Money moved to top charities from donors excluding Good Ventures
The numbers are guesstimates since not all donations influenced by GiveWell's recommendations were correctly attributed to GiveWell. The table below is restricted to the four organizations that are currently top GiveWell recommendations, since they receive the bulk of the money donated; more details about other charities are in the referenced links.
|Organization||Money moved in year 2011||Money moved in year 2012||Money moved in year 2013||Money moved in year 2014||Money moved in 2015||Total|
|Against Malaria Foundation||1,810,237||4,579,514||2,490,588||4,434,478||15,445,609||28,760,426|
|Schistosomiasis Control Initiative||510,480||861,548||1,440,184||3,340,403||2,657,389||8,810,004|
|Deworm the World Initiative||--||--||642,836||878,044||1,080,068||2,601,348|
Partnerships with philanthropies and use by other charity recommenders
In March 2010, GiveWell announced a partnership with GuideStar through GiveWell's participation, along with Great Nonprofits and Philanthropedia, in the TakeAction@GuideStar program. This program allows donors to see detailed information from GiveWell, Great Nonprofits, or Philanthropedia, where available, when looking up a charity on GuideStar.
GiveWell does not have a formal relationship with charity evaluator Giving What We Can, but Giving What We Can does reference (and occasionally critique) GiveWell's reviews of the charities that it recommends.
The website The Life You Can Save, based on an eponymous book by Peter Singer, bases its recommendations of top-rated charities on the recommendations provided by GiveWell and Giving What We Can.
Reception of GiveWell's 2013 recommendations
On December 3, 2013, Good Ventures (an effective philanthropy organization that works in close collaboration with GiveWell) announced a grant of $2 million to GiveDirectly, so that only $500,000 of the minimum target specified by GiveWell for GiveDirectly was not yet raised. Good Ventures also announced that it would match up to $5 million in funds donated to GiveDirectly till January 31, 2014 (with a limit of matching $100,000 per individual donor), suggesting that the actual amount needed from individual donors to achieve GiveWell's minimum target would be $250,000 (assuming no very large donors). GiveWell wrote a blog post responding to the Good Ventures announcement, stating that they had recommended the grant but not the donation matching.
Effective giving advocacy group and charity evaluator Giving What We Can published a blog post on December 12, 2013, stating that they continued to recommend Against Malaria Foundation as their top charity, despite it no longer being recommended by GiveWell.
Reception of GiveWell's 2012 recommendations
Charity evaluator and effective giving advocacy group Giving What We Can had multiple blog posts with critical analysis of GiveWell's 2012 recommendations. GiveWell's recommendations were also critiqued on the 80000 Hours website and elsewhere. The Wonkblog, a blog of the Washington Post, also published a piece on GiveWell's recommendations.
GiveWell has been covered by various news organizations including the New York Times, NPR, CNBC, CBS MoneyWatch, Business Week, and Forbes. USA Today and the Wall Street Journal mentioned GiveWell as an organization that can help donors research and choose charities. In December 2012, the Wonkblog of The Washington Post published a detailed post reviewing GiveWell's end-of-year charity recommendations. Dylan Matthews discussed the work of GiveWell and Good Ventures on the Open Philanthropy Project, in the broader context of the effective altruism movement, in an article for Vox. The Huffington Post published an article about GiveWell's work discussing its relationship with the ideas of effective altruism popularized by Peter Singer, and also including an interview with GiveWell co-founder Elie Hassenfeld.
GiveWell was founded in 2007 by two former Bridgewater Associates investment analysts, Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld. In 2008, GiveWell's initial funding was provided by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation's Nonprofit Marketplace Initiative, the goal of which was to ensure that "by 2015, ten percent of individual philanthropic donations in the US (or $20 billion), would be influenced by meaningful, high-quality information about nonprofit organizations’ performance." The Hewlett Foundation continued to be a major funder of GiveWell for several years. In March 2014, the Hewlett Foundation announced that it was ending the Nonprofit Marketplace Initiative. A GiveWell blog post in August 2014 offered GiveWell's thoughts on the ending of the initiative.
During 2012, GiveWell relocated from New York to San Francisco into a shared office space with Good Ventures.
In September 2011, GiveWell announced the creation of GiveWell Labs, which was created in order to research and fund more diverse philanthropic causes. In August 2014, GiveWell Labs was rebranded as the Open Philanthropy Project, to better reflect its mission as well as the fact that it was not solely a GiveWell project but rather a joint venture between GiveWell and Good Ventures.
GiveWell's board of directors investigated and found that an "inappropriate promotion" had occurred involving the founders Karnofsky and Hassenfeld; as a result, both were fined $5000, and Karnofsky was relieved of his executive director role. GiveWell issued a public apology and, as part of its transparency policy, included the incident on its website at a page called "Shortcomings" with the stated purpose: "This page logs mistakes we've made, strategies we should have planned and executed differently, and lessons we've learned." Karnofsky was later reinstated as Board Secretary and Co-Executive Director.
- American Institute of Philanthropy
- Charity Navigator
- Giving What We Can
- Raising for Effective Giving
- "Our Story". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-08-16.
- "Official Records (section:IRS-related materials)". GiveWell.
- "Contact Us". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-11-30.
- "Our people (list of employees and board members)".
- Rice, Issa (October 1, 2016). "GiveWell staff growth". Retrieved November 4, 2016.
- Matthews, Dylan (April 24, 2015). "You have $8 billion. You want to do as much good as possible. What do you do?". Vox. Retrieved April 27, 2015.
- Pitney, Nico (March 26, 2015). "That Time A Hedge Funder Quit His Job And Then Raised $60 Million For Charity". Huffington Post. Retrieved April 27, 2015.
- "About GiveWell". GiveWell. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
- "Top Charities". GiveWell. Retrieved November 20, 2015.
- Heishman, Tyler (May 13, 2016). "GiveWell's money moved and web traffic in 2015". GiveWell. Retrieved May 14, 2016.
- "Your dollar goes further overseas". GiveWell.
- "Knowledge is Power Program". GiveWell. March 2012 [July 2011]. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- "Nurse-Family Partnership". GiveWell. 2010. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- "Guide to "room for more funding" analysis". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-12-09.
- "Blog category room for more funding". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-12-09.
- "2011 international aid process review". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-08-14.
- "Accomplishing Nothing, Giving 101 section of GiveWell website". Givewell.org. Retrieved 2014-06-11.
- "How Do We Rate Charities' Financial Health?". Charity Navigator. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
- Karnofsky, Holden (2009-12-01). "The worst way to pick a charity". GiveWell. Retrieved 2013-09-21.
- "Process for identifying top charities". GiveWell. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
- "Conversations with charity representatives, funders, and subject matter experts". GiveWell. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
- "Site visits page on GiveWell website". Givewell.org. Retrieved 2014-06-11.
- "Following up". GiveWell. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
- "Charities". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-11-27.
- Stone-Crispin, Natalie (June 23, 2016). "Mid-year update to top charity recommendations". GiveWell. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
- Stone-Crispin, Natalie (April 6, 2016). "GiveWell research plans for 2016". GiveWell. Retrieved June 26, 2016.
In past years, we've updated our top charity reviews once a year, in November. This year, we plan to refresh these reviews twice, in June and November.
- Natalie Crispin (November 29, 2016). "Our updated top charities for giving season 2016". The GiveWell Blog. Retrieved November 29, 2016.
- Dylan Matthews (November 29, 2016). "These are the charities where your money will do the most good". Vox. Retrieved November 30, 2016.
- "Our updated top charities for giving season 2015". November 20, 2015. Retrieved November 20, 2015.
- Wiblin, Robert (December 24, 2015). "Where should you donate to have the most impact during giving season 2015?". 80,000 Hours. Retrieved June 4, 2016.
- "Top charities - November 2014 archived version". GiveWell. Retrieved November 20, 2015.
- Hassenfeld, Elie (December 1, 2014). "Our updated top charities". GiveWell. Retrieved December 1, 2014.
- Karnofsky, Holden (December 1, 2013). "GiveWell's Top Charities for Giving Season 2013". GiveWell. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- Flandez, Raymund (December 13, 2013). "GiveWell Recommends 3 Charities for Year-End Donations". Chronicle of Philanthropy. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- Tuna, Cari (December 3, 2013). "Our Giving Season Plans". Good Ventures. Retrieved December 3, 2013.
- Mogensen, Andreas (December 12, 2013). "Why we continue to recommend the Against Malaria Foundation". Giving What We Can. Retrieved December 21, 2013.
- Lieber, Ron (April 25, 2014). "Donating, and Making Sure the Money Is Put to Work". New York Times. Retrieved June 4, 2016.
- Karnofsky, Holden (December 20, 2013). "Update on GiveWell's Funding Needs". GiveWell. Retrieved December 21, 2013.
- Karnofsky, Holden (November 26, 2012). "Our Top Charities for the 2012 Giving Season". GiveWell. Retrieved November 26, 2012.
- "Top charities -- November 2012". GiveWell. Retrieved December 1, 2013.
- Karnofsky, Holden (2012-12-19). "Cost-effectiveness of nets vs. deworming vs. cash transfers". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-12-24.
- Karnofsky, Holden (2012-12-20). "More on the ranking of our top charities". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-12-24.
- Karnofsky, Holden (November 26, 2013). "Change in Against Malaria Foundation recommendation status (room-for-more-funding-related)". GiveWell. Retrieved November 27, 2013.
- "Top charities -- November 2011". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-11-30.
- Karnofsky, Holden (November 29, 2011). "Top charities for holiday season 2011: Against Malaria Foundation and Schistosomiasis Control Initiative". Retrieved November 26, 2012.
- Karnofsky, Holden (December 8, 2011). "Deciding between two outstanding charities". GiveWell. Retrieved November 26, 2012.
- Redwood, Zander (November 20, 2011). "The best causes – updated". 80,000 Hours. Retrieved June 4, 2016.
- "Top-rated charities -- 2010". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-11-30.
- "Top-rated charities -- 2009". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-11-30.
- "Top-rated charities -- 2008". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-11-30.
- Naik, Vipul (December 19, 2015). "GiveWell money moved forecasts and implications". Effective Altruism Forum. Retrieved June 4, 2016.
- Naik, Vipul (May 15, 2016). "GiveWell money moved in 2015: a review of my forecast and some future predictions". Effective Altruism Forum. Retrieved June 4, 2016.
- "Giving 101". GiveWell website.
- "Researching charities on your own". GiveWell. Retrieved 2012-11-27.
- "Celebrated charities we don't recommend, GiveWell blog". Blog.givewell.org. 2009-12-28. Retrieved 2014-06-11.
- Karnofsky, Holden (2008-08-29). "The case against disaster relief". GiveWell.
- "Ratings of disaster relief charities one year after the Haiti earthquake". GiveWell.
- "Japan disaster relief". GiveWell.
- "Donating to Somalia". GiveWell.
- "Blog category disaster relief". GiveWell.
- David Callahan (December 14, 2015). "How Does an Emerging "Army" of Tech Donors Think? Ask This Guy". Inside Philanthropy. Retrieved March 20, 2016.
- Karnofsky, Holden. "Open Philanthropy Project (formerly GiveWell Labs)". GiveWell.
- Nicole Bennett; Ashley Carter; Romney Resney; Wendy Woods (February 10, 2016). "bcg.perspectives - How Tech Entrepreneurs Are Disrupting Philanthropy". The Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved March 20, 2016.
- Hassenfeld, Elie. "Comment on December 2015 Open Thread".
- "Progress to Date". Open Philanthropy Project. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- "Announcing GiveWell Labs". GiveWell. September 8, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2016.
- Karnofsky, Holden (April 23, 2015). "Co-funding Partnership with Kaitlyn Trigger and Mike Krieger". GiveWell. Retrieved March 19, 2016.
- Moy, Melissa (August 13, 2015). "Glasspockets Find: Open Philanthropy Project Forms New Partnership with Instagram Co-Founder". Glasspockets. Retrieved April 9, 2016.
- Holden Karnofsky (September 17, 2015). "Open Philanthropy Project update". GiveWell Blog. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- "2016 February". GiveWell Blog. February 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
- "Good Ventures & GiveWell". Open Philanthropy Project. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
- Hassenfeld, Elie. "Comment on December 2015 Open Thread".
- "GiveWell blog category self-evaluation". GiveWell. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
- "Impact". GiveWell.
- "GiveWell blog post on money moved and web traffic for 2011". GiveWell. 2012-02-09. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
- Stone Crispin, Natalie (2013-03-12). "GiveWell annual review for 2012: details on GiveWell's money moved and web traffic". GiveWell. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
- "GiveWell annual review for 2013: details on GiveWell's money moved and web traffic". GiveWell. March 19, 2014. Retrieved March 21, 2014.
- Karnofsky, Holden (March 3, 2015). "GiveWell's Progress in 2014 and Plans for 2015: summary". GiveWell. Retrieved March 4, 2015.
- "GiveWell Metrics Report – 2015 Annual Review". GiveWell. May 13, 2016. Retrieved May 14, 2016.
- Linch Zhang (June 21, 2016). "How Can You do the Most Good with Your Charitable Giving? This Expert's Answers Might Surprise You". The Huffington Post. Retrieved June 21, 2016.
- Tuna, Cari (2011-12-23). "Guest post from Cari Tuna". GiveWell (blog).
- "Grants to "standout" charities". Good Ventures. 2012-08-06. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
- Tuna, Cari (2012-12-28). "Year-End Grants to GiveWell's Top Charities". Good Ventures. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
- Moskovitz, Dustin. "Breakthrough Philanthropy: Just Give Them the Money. Good Ventures will match every dollar up to $5M to GiveDirectly through Jan 31, 2014". Medium. Retrieved March 25, 2014.
- Karnofsky, Holden (December 3, 2013). "Good Ventures Matching Gift to GiveDirectly and Grants to Top Charities". GiveWell. Retrieved December 3, 2013.
- Joy (February 1, 2014). "Good Ventures matching challenge: $5 million raised and matched!". GiveDirectly. Retrieved March 25, 2014.
- Tuna, Cari (August 3, 2015). "Announcing a $25 Million Grant to GiveDirectly". Good Ventures. Retrieved August 4, 2015.
- Dolan, Kerry (August 3, 2015). "Facebook Billionaire's Good Ventures Donates $25 Million To GiveDirectly, Which Gives Cash To The Very Poor". Forbes. Retrieved August 4, 2015.
- Pitney, Nico (August 3, 2015). "Facebook Co-Founder Giving Millions Directly To The Poor, No Strings Attached". Huffington Post. Retrieved August 4, 2015.
- Rosenberg, Josh (August 3, 2015). "Good Ventures' $25 million grant to GiveDirectly". GiveWell. Retrieved August 4, 2015.
- Holden (2012-06-28). "GiveWell and Good Ventures".
- "GiveWell announcement on participation in TakeAction@GuideStar". Blog.givewell.org. 2010-03-29. Retrieved 2014-06-11.
- Crouch, Will (2012-11-30). "GiveWell's Recommendation of GiveDirectly". Giving What We Can. Retrieved 27 December 2012.
- Crouch, Will (2012-12-24). "Some General Concerns About GiveWell". Giving What We Can. Retrieved 27 December 2012.
- Barry, David (2012-11-29). "Splitting donations between GiveWell recommendations". 80000 Hours (discussion forum). Retrieved 27 December 2012.
- Wise, Julia (2012-12-02). "Updates". Retrieved 27 December 2012.
- Matthews, Dylan (2012-12-22). "The Wonkblog guide to holiday giving". The Washington Post. Retrieved 27 December 2012.
- "Young Duo to 'Clear' the Way for Charitable Giving". National Public Radio. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- "Shaking up Philanthropy". CNBC. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- Kristof, Kathy (14 December 2009). "Charities Fake Their Numbers to Look Good". CBS Moneywatch. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- Feldman, Amy (13 January 2010). "Rethinking Ways to Give Wisely". Business Week. Archived from the original on September 11, 2011. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- Brill, Betsy (22 January 2010). "Nonprofit CEOs Are Worth Every Dime". Forbes. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- Block, Sandra (2010-11-30). "USA Today, "How to research a charity before donating your money"". Usatoday.com. Retrieved 2011-09-13.
- Banjo, Shelly (2009-11-08). "Wall Street Journal Online, "Check Out Charities", by Shelly Banjo". Online.wsj.com. Retrieved 2011-09-13.
- "About". GiveWell. Retrieved 2011-09-13.
- Patricia Illingworth, Thomas Pogge, Leif Wenar. Giving Well: The Ethics of Philanthropy, Oxford University Press US, 2011. Pg. 124
- Peter Singer. The Life You Can Save: Acting Now To End World Poverty, Random House, 2009. Ch. 6, Pg. 81-104
- "GiveWell Story". GiveWell. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- Louie, Lindsay; Twersky, Fay (March 11, 2014). "Strengthening Our Sector". William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- Karnofsky, Holden (August 5, 2014). "Thoughts on the End of Hewlett's Nonprofit Marketplace Initiative". GiveWell. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- Holden Karnofsky (February 8, 2013). "GiveWell's progress in 2012". GiveWell. Retrieved June 17, 2016.
- Karnofsky, Holden (September 8, 2011). "Announcing GiveWell Labs". GiveWell. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- "GiveWell Labs". GiveWell.
- Karnofsky, Holden (August 20, 2014). "Open Philanthropy Project (formerly GiveWell Labs)". GiveWell. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
- Stephanie Strom (8 January 2008). "Founder of a Nonprofit Is Punished by Its Board for Engaging in an Internet Ruse". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- , GiveWell website
- Stephanie Strom (15 January 2008). "Nonprofit Punishes a 2nd Founder for Ruse". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
- Statement from the GiveWell Board of Directors, GiveWell Blog.
- Transparency Policy, GiveWell website.
- GiveWell shortcomings, GiveWell website
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to GiveWell.|