Talk:Óscar Ramírez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 21 August 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


– There's no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as shown by longterm pageviews (I was going to share a link, but there's a pipe symbol that's throwing it off when you compares pageviews of footballer and terrorist. Very similar longerm). DAB should be at base name. Also, both footballers WP:COMMONNAME for all three is just "Óscar Ramírez", so standard disambiguation should be followed. Ortizesp (talk) 05:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ortizesp: re the pipe symbol. If you experience this problem, you can replace the | in the address with &#124. Page views are here: [1]. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Noted, thanks!@Shhhnotsoloud:.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nomination. Unlike his predecessor Abimael Guzmán, whose entry appears in 25 Wikipedias, Ramírez's profile has been much lower and only three Wikipedias found him sufficiently noteworthy for an article. As for the footballers, the main headers proposed in the nomination are the standard ones. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 06:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the move about the footballers. It's not a good idea to have Óscar Ramírez (footballer) go to one particular footballer if there are other footballers named Óscar Ramírez. No opinion on the terrorist. JIP | Talk 08:42, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support 1st as no primary topic for the base name (297 for the terrorist v 270 for the 1964 footballer) weak support 2nd as a PDAB (23[[2]]) no comment on 4th. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 13:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - no PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman 13:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support 1 & 2 as there is no clear primary topic in the longer term. No opinion on 3 & 4. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.