Talk:ABS-CBN TV Plus
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 12 September 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from ABS-CBN TV Plus Digital TV Receiver to ABS-CBN TV Plus. The result of the discussion was moved. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on ABS-CBN TV Plus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090227135319/http://www.abs-cbnnews.com:80/storypage.aspx?StoryId=92374 to http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=92374
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ABS-CBN TV Plus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723155534/http://business.inquirer.net/money/topstories/view/20100611-275093/NTC-chooses-Japan-digital-TV-standard-for-RP to http://business.inquirer.net/money/topstories/view/20100611-275093/NTC-chooses-Japan-digital-TV-standard-for-RP
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 August 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There are some words that are still in present tense, please change all of them into past tense because ABS-CBN TV Plus is not allowed to operate anymore. 120.29.76.194 (talk) 00:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Not done: This article is about the product, not the broadcasting service that ABS-CBN was providing before their congressional franchise expired. -WayKurat (talk) 01:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 12 September 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
ABS-CBN TV Plus Digital TV Receiver → ABS-CBN TV Plus – User:SeanJ 2007 uncontroversially moved the original name to two different names without any provided sources or even discussions open (see revisions Special:Diff/1109162621 as "ABS-CBN TV Plus Digital TV Reciever" with reason: "renamed last September 2021"; and Special:Diff/1109164445 as the current name with reason: "wrong spelling sorry"). Based on my extensive research by looking for reliable sources, the name "ABS-CBN TV Plus Digital TV Receiver" is only used for advertising or branding purposes (which maybe is not allowed here in Wikipedia) but the official name is still referred to "ABS-CBN TV Plus" as per WP:COMMONNAME stands. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 13:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 16:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Additional note: As per WP:CRITERIA, the good article names name should be recognized, natural, precise, concise and consistent if were based on those characteristics. The current name (ABS-CBN TV Plus Digital TV Receiver) doesn't recognized as an actual name due to the absence of a claimed sources, with "Digital TV Receiver" only implies as a advertising and branding purposes based on the findings from the web search browser. With that being said, the only name that has been recognized is the previous name (ABS-CBN TV Plus), that the user who moved to the current one, meets WP:CRITERIA or possibly WP:COMMONNAME. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- @SeanJ 2007: for awareness as you commented on the technical request. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- I am neutral on this situation. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 00:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Per WP:COMMONNAME, I highly suggest of restoring it back to its old article name "ABS-CBN TV Plus". VictorTorres2002 (talk) 04:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support as per WP:COMMONNAME, should have not been moved in the first place. Howard the Duck (talk) 02:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support as per comments above. What an abomination of a name that is. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:38, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support: Long-term WP:COMMONNAME and per WP:CRITERIA. Chompy Ace 06:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)