Talk:Aframomum melegueta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


in the main entry. I have moved it to the discussion page. Rest 16:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

NOTE: There is a story today in the Washington Post which describes the anti-inflamatory benefits which may become a big part of the subject of this spice:

Perhaps the Wikipedians working on this entry may want to look at this new aspect of the subject.

melegueta pepper versus grains of paradise[edit]

Aframomum melegueta is not equal to Aframomum granum paradisi according to this site:

It certainly sounds as if there are two related but different plants, one of which became a common substitute for the other, maybe? If someone has time and resources to research and pin down the differences, we really ought to have two pages. Ed8r (talk) 23:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

See for a botanical view of this. My research in Ottawa Canada says the same, although given the confusion between 'melegueta pepper' and 'grains of paradise' and their near-equivalence in taste I'm not sure two pages are appropriate. The Roman spice came overland from inland Ghana and was probably A.melegueta, although no botanical specimens exist that I'm aware of. The medieval spice was from the then newly explored coastal region of Nigeria and was A.granum-paradisi, as documented in Kew (England) herbaria specimens of the time. Today, the inland Ghana production of A.melegueta is far greater than the Nigerian production of A.granum-paradisi, so most 'grains of paradise' outside of Nigeria are A.melegueta. shows how to distinguish fruit of the two species. Fruits of both are available from Cary Cairncross; their taste is very similar, with A.melegueta having a bit more heat and commanding a slightly higher price from spice merchants of the area. (talk) 17:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aframomum melegueta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 5 October 2016 (UTC)