Jump to content

Talk:Ana Mendieta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 September 2019 and 28 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Izaacizqpad.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mendieta means more.

[edit]

Much of Mendieta's work had a feminist political message. She made an abrupt change to performance art in 1972 and most of her interventions, performance pieces and cine films where made between 1972 and 1978. A common theme in her performance art was violence against the female body. She often went for the shock factor in representing sexual abuse and many of her performances involved significant quantities of animal blood.

This is a bit reductionist. Some of her early work responded to a series of violent rapes that had been reported in U.S. media and these performances involved using her body to represent victims of such crimes and inviting unknowing friends to crime scenes she would stage in the woods or in apartments, her own and abondoned. Often, though, her use of blood and even violence was not essentially feminist or political, but engaged with Afro-Cuban Santería practices and her memories of growing up with Santeria caretakers and housekeepers in her home in Cuba. Furthermore, as her career progressed, she used a huge variety of materials and discourses to produce different works that were not limited by an intent to shock, nor were they performed in service to a feminist polemic. Nor was there a very "abrupt" transition. I wanted to open up some new ways of reading her work here before contributing to the entry. There is a very thorough catalog about her life, history and work edited by Olga Viso called Ana Mendieta: Earth Body and a few academic treatments that open up her work with new information gleaned from her papers and interviews (though some stuff out there is pretty bad). Any thoughts?


Does anyone else find this entry on Ana Mendieta very poorly written & with what I believe Wikipedia calls an inappropriate 'tone,' particularly the phrase: "She often went for the shock factor in representing sexual abuse" ? It seems not only too colloquial, but also, as mentioned by the author above, reductionist. Dionysian kat (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ana Mendieta/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Ana's ashes are interred in her parents' grave-site, in the midst of Cuban friends who have also died, in Cedar Memorial Cemetery, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 71.57.222.73 (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

The article has her parents listed as her children. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4040:79AE:C000:6445:D74:8D8A:47EA (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ana Mendieta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ana Mendieta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ana Mendieta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

XLinkBot

[edit]

Hi Modernist. Just to point out that you last edit is exactly the same as my edit that was reverted by XLinkBot.
All I did was add the missing </ref>, but this exposes the dazeddigital link to XLinkBot. As per the edit summary by XLinkBot "www.dazeddigital.com/art-photography/article/46290/1/this-new-exhibition-reframes-the-legacy-of-artist-ana-mendieta [\bdazeddigital\.com\b]". So I removed the link, as XLinkBot didn't it just reverted the cite error back into the article.

The other part of my edits was just tidying someone else's additions to the article. I'll leave this for the moment, but I can see no good reason for you to once again revert a banned link back into the article. Please let me know if I've missed something? Thanks 89.241.33.89 (talk) 00:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ana_Mendieta&oldid=1207371839"