Talk:Ang Probinsyano (film)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 15 June 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not Moved.The prev. undiscussed move is reverted.The current request stands subsequently rejected.No policy-based retionale/explanation for making the film the primary target.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 13:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Ang Probinsyano (film) → Ang Probinsyano – The based from film as Ang Probinsyano since 1997 and remake still is 2015. also the title really confusion on the article Oripaypaykim (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- You're saying that the baseline shouldn't redirect to Ang Probinsyano (TV series)? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:20, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- its a baseline for film 1997 it should be redirect Ang Probinsyano (film) I think it wasn't extended movies and its not a Ang Probinsyano is a remake television series redirect it means is based film. Oripaypaykim (talk) 11:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Since the TV series was based on an earlier film with the same name, the film article should be primary. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose and move Ang Probinsyano (TV series) back to the base name Ang Probinsyano, which was the primary topic until a recent page move. The TV series has vastly more page views than the film: [1] and it has arguably greater long-term significance, as it has been broadcast internationlly, unlike the film which was Philippines only. The fact that one was based on the other is largely irrelevant in this case, and is not usually a valid reason for asserting a primary topic. — Amakuru (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. As Amakuru says, there's no case here for making the film, which might not even qualify for an article if not for the attention attracted by the TV series, the primary topic. Instead revert the recent undiscussed move 18:56, 25 April 2017 Janbryan (talk | contribs | block) . . (58 bytes) (+58) . . (Janbryan moved page Ang Probinsyano to Ang Probinsyano (TV series)). Andrewa (talk) 07:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support I think the should be uncontroversial move yet 66.87.64.225 (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
--Relisting. DrStrauss talk 11:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class Southeast Asian cinema articles
- Southeast Asian cinema task force articles
- Southeast Asian cinema articles needing an image
- Film articles needing an image
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Philippine-related articles
- Low-importance Philippine-related articles
- WikiProject Philippines articles