Talk:Battlefield Germany

Battlefield Germany has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 8, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games GA‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (3 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (12 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battlefield Germany/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AdrianGamer (talk · contribs) 09:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

for the Commodore 64 in April 1987 - add "released" before "in April 1987
The game was released for 8-bit consoles as well as more advanced 16-bit consoles - do not really think "more advanced" is necessary.
More gameplay information need to be mentioned in the lead
You should split the first paragraph and The game has two endings depending on the side chosen. If playing as NATO, the main objective is to stall Soviet forces long enough until American reinforcements arrive, or if playing as the Warsaw Pact, the objective is to destroy all NATO forces and then create a "setting" section.
a variety of different types of unit - Rephrase it to "a variety of units"
however armoured units will be able to withstand more damage than regular units - "will be able" should be changed to "are able"
There are two maps in the game - Rephrase it to "The game displays two maps on screen".
(despite not having any differentiation on the map) - bracket shouldn't be used. I do not really see the importance of mentioning this actually.
"best looking" wargames he had ever seen - Should be "he had even seen at that time"

Great work on the article, and when all the issues are fixed, the article is good to go. AdrianGamer (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AdrianGamer: thanks for the review! I've attempted top address everything. I removed the "despite not having any differentiation on the map" sentence as it was a little redundant. I've also split some of the gameplay into a new settings section as suggested, I hope I done this right? Please let me know if you have any more concerns or if I messed anything up. Thanks again for the review. JAGUAR 21:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for addressing all the issues so quickly. Battlefield Germany is now a good article. Congratulations! AdrianGamer (talk) 02:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battlefield Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305191639/http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/articles/battlefieldgermany.htm to http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/articles/battlefieldgermany.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]