Jump to content

Talk:Born This Way (song)/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Verb tense error

In the introduction, it's stated that "Previously, she had sang part of the chorus at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards in 2010.". This should be "she had sung" instead of "she had sang". Will someone please correct that?

16 countries

The song is number one in 16 countries, not 15, u can count the number ones in the table of the chart success section. Could you update it, thanks ^^

New Zealand is spelt incorrectly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.62.233 (talk) 21:23, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

 Done Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 21:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

US Radio Songs

This article from Billboard says she is #1 on Radio Songs: http://www.billboard.com/news/lady-gaga-glee-songs-dominate-hot-100-1005089442.story#/news/lady-gaga-glee-songs-dominate-hot-100-1005089442.story Here is the quote: The lead single and title track from her third studio album, due May 23, becomes her second No. 1 on Radio Songs (3-1), following "Paparazzi" in 2009, and gains by 3% to 182,000 downloads sold, according to Nielsen SoundScan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.104.229 (talk) 16:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

 Done Adabow (talk · contribs) 19:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Certification

Gold in Switzerland source! --79.216.214.89 (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Adabow (talk · contribs) 19:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Songs for Japan

Can we edit something about this link? It's a BTW remix. --NicolásTM (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

I think so. Look at what I added to "Irreplaceable" and do something similar here. Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, i'm from Wikipedia en español and my english is bad -.- it's basic, for that i wish that somebody who speak english do something with the information. Thanks, --NicolásTM (talk) 04:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

#1 in European Top 100

http://www.charly1300.com/eurosingles.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.104.229 (talk) 07:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

That is unofficial. The Billboard European Hot 100 Singles has been out of print since December, but maybe you were thinking of a different chart? Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:37, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I just wondered, as Jennifer Lopez is credited with #3 in Europe from the same chart with 'On The Floor' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Floor#cite_note-73)

Not more. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 08:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

#1 in Croatia

http://www.hrt.hr/hr/top20/strana_lista.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.104.229 (talk) 08:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

It is not considered a reliable chart, see Wikipedia:Record charts#Deprecated charts. -- Frous (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Not a South Korea #1

I don't know who keeps changing it, but the song never reached number one in South Korea. On the Gaon Chart, there has NEVER been a foreign artist number one. "Born This Way" peaked at number thirty three, which is relatively high for a foreign artist. There is a separate chart, called the Foreign Digital Chart, where she did reach number one. But, the chart that is used on Wikipedia is the domestic and foreign synthesis chart. So whoever keeps changing the South Korea number, please stop. Proof here by the way: http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/search/chart_list.gaon?Search_str=Born%20This%20Way (국외 is foreign chart, 종합 is the correct combo chart) where it says "2010년 8주" (Year 2010, Week 8). (Higher in the list it says 28, but that is monthly and not weekly.) 21nolja 00:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

This link: http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/search/list.gaon?Search_str=Born+This+Way+&x=22&y=9 Shows she was #1 on the South Korean International Artists Chart. Surely that should be included. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.104.229 (talk) 12:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


Can someone fix the similar problem in the "hold it against me" article? it peaked at 73 in the international chart, but the article says it peaked at number 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolkidfromma (talk • contribs) 04:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Composition

Here's the link of the Music Notes sheet music, to the composition of the song.--NicolásTM (talk) 02:52, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done Added. Thanks. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


Hot Dance Hit a #1??

the 2011 article about the Dance Hits this year doesn't list Born This Way as a #1, yet this article does. Yes or No? calvin999 (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Source Billboard http://www.billboard.com/#/column/chartbeat/chart-highlights-pop-adult-contemporary-1005110862.story —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.0.157 (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Billboard' releases some of the next weeks chart highlights soon. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:25, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Chart history

1. Born This Way is the fastest song of Lady Gaga's to sell 2 mio. copies in the USA as it only took 8 weeks for doing so. This makes the song the 5th fastest one of all songs behind Flo Rida's "Right Round" which did it in just five weeks, "California Gurls" by Katy Perry featuring Snoop Dogg and "Love The Way You Lie" by Eminem featuring Rihanna which both took seven weeks as well as The Black Eyed Peas' "Boom Boom Pow" which also took eight weeks .

2. Hitting the 2-mio-mark, it's the first time that 2 songs did so in the first quartal of a year, as Cee Lo Green's Fuck You already reached this mark a few weeks ago. source--79.216.218.188 (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I feel its kinda undue and too much. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

French Single Chart

According to Disque en france born this way debut at number one on physical chart, but according to lescharts it only peaked at 2. so which one is preferable.Ashishvats23 (talk 10:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/monopage.xml?id=256084

http://www.lescharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Lady+Gaga&titel=Born+This+Way&cat=s

It reached #1!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.98.63.220 (talk) 14:06, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Only the chart that takes into account all sales (physical and digital), should be mentioned in the charts list. -- Frous (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

More charts

"born this way" got to number 1 in the dutch top 40, here is the proof: http://acharts.us/dutch_top_40 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.164.201 (talk) 05:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Already present. You know that Netherlands = Dutch right? — Legolas (talk2me) 06:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
I think the he/she meant the Dutch Top 40, which is different from the Single Top 100. But I think that we generally only use the Top 100. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
If so then Top 100 should be removed. It is not a comprehensive chart like Top 40. The top 40 combines airplay+singles while the top 100 is just a singles sales chart. My mistake should have checked. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from DBoy92, 11 April 2011

I want to add the chart position of "Born This Way" on the South African Singles Chart.

DBoy92 (talk) 08:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable source to verify this? Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I do. Site: http://www.take40sa.co.za/pages/index.asp — Preceding unsigned comment added by DBoy92 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I think it was denied as a reliable source. They are a single monitor chart. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
This is a radio station vote-based chart, and is therefore unofficial. See WP:GOODCHARTS for charts that are accepted for use on Wikipedia. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Poland - 1

In Poland BTW is first right now. zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/nielsen/top5.php —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.23.195.58 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

"Born this way was met with mixed response from music critics." Hm... most of the reviews I see there are positive. Just saying... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.240.72.100 (talk) 03:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Reviews Consensus

"Born this way was met with mixed response from music critics." (General section) "Born this way was met with mixed response from music critics." (Response/Critical Response Section) I would like to change both of these sections that state that the song was met with "mixed" response, to state "Born This Way was met with positive reception from music critics". Clearly, in the reviews cited, the general consensus was positive, if not overwelmingly so.

User:Renamed user 2423tgiuowf (talk) 01:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Renamed user 2423tgiuowf


Agreed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.121.222.54 (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Overwhelmingly, would imply no negativity. There is some strong negative comments, the relative size of the positive vs. negative reception paragraph's or the number of +ve vs. -ve comments is not necessarily the indication here. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
What about "mixed to positive" or generally positive? Adabow (talk · contribs) 23:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I'd use "generally positive" reviews; according to the sources given in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.121.222.54 (talk) 02:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Mixed to positive, based on the fact that there are several negative comments from highly respected reviewers. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 02:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
"Several negative comments"? Mention 3 negative comments showed in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.43.252.18 (talk) 01:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


To agree with the statement above, the positives greatly outnumber the negatives. I would like to suggest a final "generally positive" as the consensus. This would change "Born This Way recieved mixed to positive reviews from music critics" to "Born This Way recieved generally positive reviews from music critics". This would sum up the consensus perfectly, as it does suggest there were some negative reviews, although the positives far outweigh the negatives. This would also carry over into the page's "Critical Response" section for clarity and continuity.

User:Renamed user 2423tgiuowf (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Renamed user 2423tgiuowf

No, I have personally revamped the article, and find that mixed to positive is the correct tallying for the reviews. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Nope. There are more positive reviews than negative. There's, I think, 1 negative review and one mixed. Is that mixed to positive? Everyone here agrees to use generally positive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.43.179.176 (talk) 00:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Yes its mixed to positive, because comparisons to other songs is a downplaying factor here, which minimises the holier positive aspects. It will be mixed to positive, and not positive. End of discussion. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm trying to change it to "mixed to positive" but it keeps being reverted, someone fix this please.--HusseinIED (talk) 18:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Renaming this article.

Is it ok for me to change Born This Way (song) to Born This Way (Lady GaGa song)?Just asking.--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 00:34, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

No. Per naming coventions this is the only song called "Born This Way". We'd only use (Lady Gaga song) where there are multiple songs of the name "Born This Way". — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 01:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Alright.I was just asking.Thank you for replying.--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 01:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
No problem. It was good that you asked before simply moving it. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 01:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Music video image

I think a much more suitable image can be used for the music video still. The zombie thing doesn't really have anything to do with the conception of the song or video. I think it would be more appropriate and helpful if an image of Gaga appearing as "Mother Monster" or something of the sort would be used. It would more efficiently show and help the reader understand the whole "new race without prejudice" thing.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 07:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes Nathan, I thought so too, but then while developing the article one thing struck me was the NFCC thing. The previous image which we had of the mother monster, was a far more prevalent image of Gaga in this era with the prosthetics on her face. Hence I thought that would not add anything to the readers understanding of the article. And I tried the giving birth to new race images, which, (besides appearing gross) I couldnot take any clear picture. The video frame is too fast in those instants. Hence I felt that a different approach was needed in terms of the other meaning of the video, the conceptual one where Gaga wanted to portray how society doesnot dictate what she thinks is beautiful. That's why she chose Rick Genest's make-up, which she confirmed took over an hour. I felt that it gives a different look from Gaga, an albeit abstract one which would have been pretty unaccountable in words. So that's why I chose that image. Which instant do you feel can serve the NFCC purpose as well? — Legolas (talk2me) 07:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Well, when you explain it that way, I definitely understand why you chose this image. Now, these are a few I personally think would be better, but feel free to disagree. This one while, as you said above, is quite weird and gross, portrays her as "Mother Monster", giving birth to the "new race of people not recognizing prejudice." I think this is pretty much a nice some up of the video. Another worth taking a look at is this one, which kind of mimics the poses she uses in live performances as well. Aside from being so important in the video that Gaga mimics it in all live performances so far, it shows her and the "new race" all together and reaching out to (going to leave that as blank, because it is heavily opinionated). What do you think about these two?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The second pic you linked to (new race etc) can be replaced by a free image of a concert performance. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
That is true, but it definitely helps to see the source; the real still from the video. Also, what about the first picture?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:44, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Lol, nathan I did not mean that the birthing scene was grtoss, rather the screenshot which I took, that appeared gross nd blurry. Anyways, I would like to have a consensus on this before I replace the image. — Legolas (talk2me) 09:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh, lol, ok. Sure, yeah lets see what others think about it. Personally, what do you think? Lets start with that.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 09:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The first image is of brilliant resolution and can be used definitely to explain the birthing scene and also some of the neo-surrealism associated with it (third eye etc). As for the second image, I agree with Adabow that it is easily replaceable by concert footage, hence will fail NFCC#7. As for the first one, I think its fine to upload if we have a consensus. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Other Versions

"The Glee cast announced that they will cover the song during a thematic episode of their second season.[125][126] The episode is also named "Born This Way", and is the eighteenth episode, from the second season of Glee, and it is set to air in the United States in April 2011, on Fox." They already have! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.191.115 (talk) 14:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Capital H-I-M

There's been quite some discussion on the meaning of "it doesn't matter if you love him or capital H-I-M". Do you think it could be relevant to add some of that? Does she mean that it doesn't matter if you love a man or you love God? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.146.41.55 (talk) 19:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

There's a double-meaning in that term, if not more. HIM is an abbreviation for "His Infernal Majesty" (Satan) in addition to being the all-uppercase form of the pronoun. In modern times, Christians mostly use capitalization rather than all-uppercase ("Him" vs "HIM") when referring to their god, so that interpretation seems a bit archaic. Oh, and of course there's a popular band called "HIM" (in addition to a now-defunct less widely known band with the same name). -- 78.35.115.245 (talk) 20:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Graham Norton Show

Performed Born This Way along with Judas on Friday 13th May 2011 on the Graham Norton Show in the UK where she also gave an interview. Notable as it is only the second time is has performed live on TV apart from the Grammys? calvin999 (talk) 22:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Introduction

The music video for the song was directed by Nick Knight and by Gaga herself. It premiered on Monday, February 28, 2011 and was inspired by painters like Salvador Dalí and Francis Bacon, and their surrealistic images. The main idea behind the video is Gaga giving birth to a new race. The video commences with a prologue, in which Gaga talks about the new race who are born without prejudices and concludes with the view of a city populated by this race.

I don't think it concludes with a view of the city. It concludes with a gum-chewing zombie gaga. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.113.252 (talk) 15:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Greek mythology?

It says in the music video part that a reference is made to Janus, which may be so, but in the box on the side it says that it references to Greek mythology, while Janus was part of the Roman mythology. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.129.39.22 (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Portugal Singles Top 50

Born This Way reached a peak of 9 this week on the Portugal Singles Top 50 Chart. Should we include it in the article in the charts section? Here is the source: http://acharts.us/portugal_singles_top_50

I know this isn't the right place to discuss it, but instead of doing 3 new sections on different pages, here: -Judas peaked at #8. -Hair (promo single) peaked at #19 -and The Edge of Glory peaked at #8 as well. Are we allowed to include those numbers on their corresponding articles? Zpenguin23 (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Zpenguin23

No Portugal Singles on acharts is a WP:BADCHART. — Legolas (talk2me) 05:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Born this way in Estonia

The Single Born this way was also No 1 in Estonia, I think you can add this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.238.50.169 (talk) 18:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Source? — Legolas (talk2me) 05:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

BORN THIS WAY SINGLE GOLD IN BELGIUM

Hey guys, Born this way (Single) is gold in Belgium. It needs to be added. Thanks! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elbebitodelamuerte (talk • contribs) 17:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

born this way peak 7 Adult POp SOngs

http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100#/song/lady-gaga/born-this-way/24756901 Thanks:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elbebitodelamuerte (talk • contribs) 17:06, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

That link did not say anything about a Pop Songs peak. Consider an archive chart link maybe? WIKIPEDIAN PENGUIN (♫♫) 20:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Mixed reception?

Unless I missed something, for what I remember, it had been clarified that the song's critical reception was mixed to positive, not just positive or mixed. In all honesty, most reviews are positive, but there is a fair number of negative reviews, thus, I think that mixed to positive is more accurate than just mixed.

--Theologiae (talk) 20:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Born this way 3x platinum

billboard states that lady gaga's "born this way" sold 3,029,000 copies, making it 3x platinum: http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100#/news/adele-katy-perry-rule-mid-year-billboard-1005266992.story?page=3

or do we need to wait for a proper certification for it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.139.223 (talk) 21:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

We need to wait its RIAA certification. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

VMA

So no one is going to mention the fact that this supposedly great video got only 1 nomination at this year's VMA? If it got more, I bet i would be listed in the intro... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.34.215.159 (talk) 07:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Hasn't actually broken the sales record

I don't understand how it says this song has broken the highest downloads in a single week record, surpassing Hold It Against Me when Ke$ha's TiK ToK sold 610,000 copies in the first week.

This seems to be a very odd record with Today Was A Fairytale, Hold It Against Me and now Born This Way claiming to break it, despite being released after TiK ToK and getting less sales

Can someone edit this please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.34.125 (talk) 14:39, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Kesha didn't sell 610k copies in her first week, it charted already some weeks before and reached this in one week in January but not in the first week. Born This Way sold 448k in its release week, that was the case. It's not about the biggest weekly sales ever but the biggest first weekly sales ever... --79.199.60.37 (talk) 15:56, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Australia

BTW is 4x Platinum in Australia source= ARIA

Please add =) --79.199.60.37 (talk) 15:56, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Not done yet. Where did you find this? This link still says 3× P. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 16:01, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Marking as answered. Jnorton7558 (talk) 01:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I feel its necessary to put up a link for the music video! --117.198.144.181 (talk) 13:52, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

May be in the external links section, although I find adding a YouTube link to be highly against our criteria for reliability. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:31, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
It would moreover be a copyright issue than a reliability issue as the link is from an official source (Vevo). —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 18:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Billboard.com's 2011 Mid-Year Music Awards

Are the Billboard.com's 2011 Mid-Year Music Awards a some real awards? They are real to put it here? In a award section... i'm talking about the "FAVORITE BILLBOARD 200 NO. 1 ALBUM" and "FAVORITE HOT 100 NO. 1 SONG". --NicolásTM (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Writing credits

On the Born This Way page, under the track listing, it says that "Born This Way" was written by Gaga and Jeppe Laursen. However, the "Born This Way" infobox states that the song was written by Gaga, Jeppe Laursen, Fernando Garibay, and DJ White Shadow. However, it was only Gaga and Laursen who wrote the song. It even says so in the Born This Way album liner notes. This needs to be cleared up. Permission to change? --Christianrxx (talk) 16:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Christianrxx

Barack Obama mashup

I added the following section to the article:

with two WP:RS references. The section was removed for the stated reason "this is an unofficial fan mashup... stated completely in the sources.. it is by an anonymous user.. things like this happen randfomly... doesnt mean they are notable.". My claim is that yes, there are lots of such mashups, but few go viral and become notable. This one, because it was mentioned in multiple WP:Secondary sources, should be able to meet the WP:Notability criteria. Victor Victoria (talk) 17:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. Just because a video goes viral doesn't make it notable for an article such as this. pcuser42 (talk) 20:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Care to elaborate? It seems that if a song inspired someone to do something, and that something gets covered by secondary sources independent of the subject, then it meets the Wikipedia notability requirement and it should be included. Victor Victoria (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an Wikipedia:INDISCRIMINATE collector of information. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Reading WP:INDISCRIMINATE, the proposed section doesn't fit any of the examples listed. I recognize that there is no way the list at WP:INDISCRIMINATE could be exhaustive, so I'll make the case why I think this fact does belong in the article.
There is the famous quote "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery" (attributed to Charles Caleb Colton). Therefore, if the song inspires somebody to form another piece of art, and if that art becomes notable (notability established with coverage by multiple secondary sources), then it should be listed.
Victor Victoria (talk) 17:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The information is vastly trivial and without significant discussion from several reliable sources, it is not notable for inclusion. Not everything that can be only reliably sourced should be included. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

"without significant discussion from several reliable sources"???? Two reference are given in article, and here are two more just for fun [1],[2]. I can include more, but I really don't think it's necessary. Victor Victoria (talk) 23:37, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Okay, but do they discuss, analyze, critique, etc. the video? It's still trivial, even if sourced. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:42, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, they do. They discuss how Obama supports the It Gets Better campaign, and this is a pro GLBT song. Victor Victoria (talk) 01:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
And now you are going into WP:OR territory, with claiming that BTW and the campaign are mutually inclusive. WP stated above, there is no notability for the mash-up created, it was produced by an anonymous user. There are millions of mash-ups like this all over the internet, and they also get mention. But that does not mean we need to include every one in an enclyclopedia. This one is simply not notable enough. I can care less for any politial agenda associated with the addition. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
How is it WP:OR when I'm quoting WP:RS? Please stop saying the mashup is not notable when it is referenced by WP:RS. Victor Victoria (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Usa certifiacion

What about United states certifications,here says this song sold about 3.5million coppis,but on certifications section there is no 3X platinum Usa.....Please Change!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.178.138.24 (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Born This Way: Mixolydian

A lot of song pages, actually, not just Born This Way (song), list the key of the songs as C major, or B major, or F major, or any major key based entirely on the key signature suggested by or written for the song. This is regardless of the actual tonic note: the note that the song actually gravitates toward. The song is in F# major, not B major, in spite of the five sharps. CPGACoast (talk) 22:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Salimmerchant2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Salimmerchant2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Salimmerchant2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Madonna's Response

I think they're should be a whole section on Madonna's reaction/cover of the song so it can be more organized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.108.134 (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Persistent vandalism

There seem to be a lot of IP editors that insist on changing the writer to Madonna, which I keep reverting. I'm not sure on how to go about organising an edit lock on pages, so could someone sort that out if appropriate? pcuser42 (talk) 21:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Perry v Brown

So, in the Perry v. Brown article, which overturned California's anti-gay-marriage proposition 8, Gaga tweeted after the decision that it inspired her to write songs. Was this such a song? 69.7.41.230 (talk) 19:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Cover/Mash-up with "Express Yourself"

Ariana Grande uploaded a video of a cover of the song, mashed-up with "Express Yourself" on february 27, 2011 on her youtube channel: here is the video. She also performed it live in at least three occasions, but I cannot find exact info about dates and locations (exception made for Myrtle Beach) in the youtube videos. Turbo:motion (talk) 08:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Cover/Mash-up with "Express Yourself"

Ariana Grande uploaded a video of a cover of the song, mashed-up with "Express Yourself" on february 27, 2011 on her youtube channel: here is the video. She also performed it live in at least three occasions, but I cannot find exact info about dates and locations (exception made for Myrtle Beach) in the youtube videos.

Sorry for the double post, Wiki asked me the captcha twice and I thought I made a mistake typing it.

Turbo:motion (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit request

The lede currently includes this sentence: "Inspired by the 1990s empowering music for women and the gay community, Gaga explained that "Born This Way" was her freedom song." I can't seem to come up with a useful replacement, but someone should really rewrite that. "1990s empowering music for..." is a tricky phrase to comprehend, and is repetitious of the related text in the body. "Her freedom song" is also distracting, as it seems to be a made-up idiom – if that's a quote, it should be punctuated as such, and if it's not, it should be reworded to something more accessible. SteveStrummer (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

This is really so important to have such a long article about this song?

Wikipedia is so weird, short articles about very important things... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:208C:CCEE:611D:559 (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

The Country Road Version

Should include information about this version (released as a promotional single here) Simon (talk) 14:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

@HĐ: it is included in the remixes section. :) —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 15:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Extended content

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Born This Way (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Born This Way (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Born This Way (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Born_This_Way_(song)/Archive_2&oldid=1142436231"