Talk:Carl Maria Splett

Updated

Updated the article. Removed dead link. Added information on Nazi collaboration.Added Nazi collaboration to the lead--Molobo (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

• You've deleted sourced content and a link as "blind", which was perfectly working, never, NEVER do this again.HerkusMonte (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
• Czesław Madajczyk. Polityka III Rzeszy w okupowanej Polsce pages 177-212 volume 2 , Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa, 1970

is a source published in Warsaw in 1970, something that should be mentioned. I'll do something more on the background of Splett's policy after 1939 and the pressure the Nazis exerted on him (based on modern online sources).HerkusMonte (talk) 16:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Madajczyk is considered reliable, as far as I know. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 12:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

From my readings, his collaboration with the Germans was not very extensive. See [1] - although I don't know how reliable this source is? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 12:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

It's an amateur website. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 02:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Reliable Source

http://www.ostdeutsche-biographie.de

This seems to be a private webpage and thus would not be considered a reliable source per WP:RS.--Molobo (talk) 15:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Website not working

http://www.kirchenlexikon.de/s/splett_c_m.shtml

The above site is a dead link to me. --Molobo (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

It's dead for me too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:30, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

It's perfectly working, anyone else having a problem? HerkusMonte (talk) 18:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

German version much less nationalistic

The German version provides some important clarifications: 1. He issued his ban on Polish only after Nazi threats to kill the remaining clergy, and the Nazis did not allow him to even hint that this was a government order; 2. When he called German priests, it was because there were few Polish ones left, because the Nazis had arrested/killed them. What was he supposed to do, provide no Catholic priests at all? 3. Some Poles may have had an exaggerated view of the powers of a bishop in an area NOT protected by the Konkordat of 1933, and so he had to be deferential to Nazi leaders to protect his flock, a behavior Poles should not find astonishing--after all, did Polish bishops spit in the faces of the Bierut regime all the time, or work softly to prevent worse? 4. Personally, any writing on these subjects published during the heyday Communist regime needs to be flagged. History was even more of a battlefield then than it is now and printing was censored. It's no different than flagging books published during the Third Reich. Karpaten1 (talk) 02:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

"Despite the pressure of Polish authorities all Catholic priests interrogated as witnesses made exculpatory testimonies"

This is incorrect.I will provide testimonies. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 21:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

A small question. Was he affiliated with "Bund der Danziger" and newspaper "Unser Danzig"

The article only states that he worked with expelled. I would be grateful for an answer to this. Of course I will be able to find answer to that on my own, but more knowledgeable people would save me the time :) --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 21:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carl Maria Splett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100815013239/http://www.ostdeutsche-biographie.de:80/spleca98.htm to http://www.ostdeutsche-biographie.de/spleca98.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)