This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The history merge is needed to preserve the contributions of the various editors. If we just blank the Champak (magazine) page and make it into a redirect, the information that was added is lost. ... discospinstertalk 02:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Napsync : I completely filled the Champak article with the same content as of (magazine) and placed the redirection there. Please do not stick these tags,
I shall be highly oblized to you for this act of kindness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napsync (talk • contribs) 02:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
I don't think you understand what I'm saying here. I'm not talking about the content, I am talking about crediting the other editors that contributed to the Champak (magazine) article. If you blank the page and redirect it, their contributions are not acknowledged. This is a problem because Wikipedia must attribute all edits to their proper authors. ... discospinstertalk 03:04, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
I SEE : fine now there are 2 articles that are Champak & Champak (magazine) having same content, excellent Have a good day... May God Bless You !! --Napsync (talk) 03:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
They have the same content because you copied one into the other. Like I said, it has to be merged in a certain way in order to preserve the history. I might be able to do it but I'm not guaranteeing anything. ... discospinstertalk 16:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)