Jump to content

Talk:Creid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCreid has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 12, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Japanese title translations

[edit]

Saw that someone changed 'Stairs of Light' to 'Stars of Light' and 'October Mermaid' to 'June Mermaid'
Original track name in Japanese: 光の階段 (Hikari no Kaidan) which translates to 'Stairs of Light'. I changed it back.
Original track name in Japanese: 神無月の人魚 (Kaminatsuki no Ninkyo). Kaminatsuki one of the old Japanese names for October but I've always seen this track translated as June Mermaid. The old Japanese name for June is 水無月 so it may be plausible that someone screwed up the translation way back and it stuck. Are there any official English translations for any of the Xenogears albums? Changing it back to October Mermaid, which is used in other Wikipedia articles.
24.195.129.34 00:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Creid/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    This sentence sounds a bit wordy: While one reviewer named it "one of the best arranged albums ever", another felt that, though it was in his opinion one of Mitsuda's best works, some of the vocal performances, especially in "Two Wings" and "Spring Lullaby", held the album back. Reword it a little.
    OK. I see it now. It was buried underneath all those edits. MuZemike 20:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    As I brought up at Talk:Junya Nakano/GA1, there is only seven whole paragraphs whose sources only stem from two websites. I don't think there is enough broad coverage here to pass this criteria.
    Looks better. MuZemike 19:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    There could perhaps be another image, but one is fine and is passing in my book.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    GAN placed on hold pending any improvements above. MuZemike 20:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing this. I've fixed the sentence; I'll see if I can find some more information on the album soon. Please note that there are more than two sources, however- RPGFan, RPGamer, Procyon Studio, the liner notes from both Xenogears albums, N-Sider, Square Enix Music Online, and OneUp Studios. --PresN 21:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, let me clarify. Is there any other secondary coverage of the game outside the abovementioned sources that can suggest more broad coverage? MuZemike 21:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm assuming you meant album, not game. I've expanded the information a bit, and added two sources. I'll keep looking for more sources, though I'm not terribly optimistic as there are few English sources that review video game soundtrack albums. How much more would you be looking for? The article sat in the queue for a month, so I'd really like to fix everything to your specifications now rather than have to re-GAN it. --PresN 03:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Take your time if needed. MuZemike 20:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I've added a bunch of information to the article since the version reviewed, how is it looking now? --PresN 19:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Coverage looks a lot better and I think passable. Did you address the prose issue I mentioned above? MuZemike 19:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did. --PresN 20:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Passed. I finally saw the edit. Looks good. MuZemike 20:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Creid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Creid&oldid=1211166509"