Jump to content

Talk:Deep Dasgupta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

It is Quite Early to say that deep das gupta has been discard from the Indian team> I feel he the best reserve wicket keeper for India. deep has played very well on the tough tour of of south Africa. not only he was a Safe hand behind the wicket> but also he played a match saving inning at wonderers> in he mayed his madien hundered while batting as an opener. presentl Indianteam is strugling for the opener partner. I think Selector should try deep das> because i hitnk might the person whick BCCI is looking for> Imran Ahmad

We didn't say "discard" in any sense, but it simply states that Deep Dasgupta has been dropped. This is entirely factual. It is not appropriate for an encyclopedia to do opinion/analysis on whether somebody is going to have a bright or not-so-bright future.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 07:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

It's quite disturbing how much vandalism was on this article, and has been for a while. I've cleaned up the obvious, someone who knows cricket would be better checking the stats etc. GimliDotNet (talk) 16:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deep Dasgupta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]