Talk:Dmitry Kabalevsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

This page seems to be mostly plagiarized from [1]. I'll mark it as such once I figure out how to do that. YashaBK 12:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, it's more the other way around, in that 8notes.com took their Kabalevsky biography from the Wikipedia article. If you look at the bottom of the 8notes article for Kabalevsky, you'll see in small type "This biography is published under the GNU Licence", where the GNU license is a direct link to this article. Tabercil 22:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • My mistake. I'll make sure to look out for that. Thanks. YashaBK 01:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article name[edit]

This should be moved to "Dmitri Borisovich Kabalevsky". The -iy transcription is nonsense in English. But the computer says this page already exists, so I guess somebody moved it from that to this, quite lamentable. See Dmitri Shostakovich, or Tchaikovsky: no -iy!!!!! Kraxler 15:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In any case. Please settle on one spelling, and work on the content. The Nation was similarly throw-up-the-hands-in-the-air frustrating. Schissel | Sound the Note! 01:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of death[edit]

A google search for "Kabalevsky February 1987" throws up three dates: 14 Feb, 16 Feb, 18 Feb 1987. Russian WP has 14 Feb, we have 18 Feb. What's the true date, and how do we know for sure? -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 11:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

His death was reported in the 18 February 1987 edition of the NY Times, based on a Tass report dated the previous day 17 February. From this, it's possible to conclude that there's no way he could have died as late as the 18th. The Russian article says it happened on 14 February and many of the other interlanguage articles agree (not all, admittedly). Given the usually protracted delay between the death of a Soviet celebrity and the public announcement, a 3-day gap is not at all surprising. I am consequently changing it to 14 February 1987, in line with the Russian article. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 05:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oddly enough, the New Grove article on Kabalevsky by Dina Grigor′yevna Daragan agrees with your conclusion, if you need an Authority.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 05:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not odd at all. Great minds think alike, don't you know.  :) -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 05:25, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Terribly sorry, my mistake!—Jerome Kohl (talk) 06:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabalevski.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Kabalevski.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kabalevski.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Works section[edit]

Should the Works section be before or after Honours and awards? Also, if there's any content should the See List of compositions by Dmitry Kabalevsky be changed to Main article: List of compositions by Dmitry Kabalevsky? George8211 (talk | mail) 18:17, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry or Dmitri[edit]

Is there any reason why we should continue with the unorthodox romanisation Dmitry? Did Kabalevsky use this spelling himself when writing in English? That would be the only justification, really. Apparently at one time we spelt it Dmitriy (see Article name above), and the remedy chosen was to drop the i. Dropping the y would have been the thing to do.

I'd like to see this moved to Dmitri Kabalevsky (and without the patronymic). Do I have any supporters? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:34, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but the spelling Dmitry seems to be more common on Wikipedia, if the page on the name is to be believed. Rothorpe (talk) 23:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I have 10 CDs devoted to Kabalevsky. Only two use Dmitry, others all use Dmitri -- and what's especially wierd is that there are two discs on the ASV label, with the same conductor/orchestra, and they differ (with Dmitry being on the one from 1996 and Dmitri being on the one from 1998). Obviously this isn't really any sort of proof, but it's a good point toward common name being Dmitri. The given reason for the move was WP:RUS but then why is Shostakovich at Dmitri? ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

names in photo captions[edit]

Aren't the children's names in the wrong order in both photos? The girl is on the left, the boy is on the right! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.162.143 (talk) 10:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dmitry Kabalevsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dmitry Kabalevsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy section[edit]

This section is bizarre and barely intelligible. It seems that some of it has been generated by one or more bots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philologer (talkcontribs) 16:39, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kabalevsky and Gavriil Popov[edit]

The article covers Kabalevsky's role in the 1948 congress of Composers' Union. However, I have found that this documentary titled "Khachaturian: The virtuous Soviet Armenian composer" claims that Kabalevsky suggested his name to be replaced with Gavriil Popov's name, who was condemned in said congress as a formalist composer. My question is: should be this be added to the article? I leave a link to the documentary, Kabalevsky is mentioned from 41:55 to 42:13 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIJUWrcA6Hw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:C50F:A742:2500:C419:701C:7B9F:E299 (talk) 20:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]