Talk:Doctor Who series 10

Doctor Who series 10 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 7, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doctor Who series 10 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Doctor Who High‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Monks Trilogy[edit]

Do we have confirmation from DWM on whether or not it's a three parter yet or are we still waiting on that? Microbat98 (talk) 16:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Under Episodes: The sixth, seventh and eighth episodes of the series, "Extremis", "The Pyramid at the End of the World", and "The Lie of the Land", constitute a three-part arc while remaining separate stories. Source provided: "Truth or Dare". Doctor Who Magazine. No. 512. 4 May 2017. p. 27. -- Alex^TW 16:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further: Talk:Doctor Who (series 10)/Archive 1#Story Numbers 2 -- Alex^TW 16:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Doctor Who (series 10)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 01:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some Dude From North Carolina, thank you for your review! I believe I've covered all of the changes requested. -- /Alex/₂₁ 02:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

Infobox looks good but I would recommend improving the poster's non-free use rationale with this template.
Remove the comma after "revival in 2005".
Add a comma after "Toby Whithouse".
Remove the comma after "worked on the show".
Add a comma after "plots".
- All done -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes[edit]

Remove the comma after "aliens' ship".
Remove the comma after "investigates the puddle".
"crew were inefficient" → "crew was inefficient"
"which leads" → "that leads"
Remove the comma after "Time Lord technology".
Add a comma after "Chinese".
Remove the comma after "offers his consent".
Remove the comma after "another solution".
Add a comma in between "however the".
"humanity recall" → "humanity recalls"
Add a comma after "The Doctor, Bill".
Add a comma after "The Doctor, Nardole".
Remove the comma after "fights off the Cybermen".
Remove the comma after "body back to his TARDIS".
Remove the comma after "attempts to stop it".
Add a comma after "displaced, confused".
The summaries of "The Pilot", "Extremis", "The Eaters of Light", "World Enough and Time", "The Doctor Falls", and "Twice Upon a Time" need to have less than 200 words.
- All done -- /Alex/₂₁ 02:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casting[edit]

The second reference after "Radio Times" is missing a website parameter.
Can the four references after "first episode of the series" be distributed?
Mark the only source after "every episode" as dead.
The citation after "episode of Doctor Who" doesn't mention the series.
Add a comma after "Aleksandar Jovanovic".
Mark the reference after "Missy in the series" as dead.
- All done -- /Alex/₂₁ 02:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production[edit]

Add a comma after "6 March 2017".
Remove the comma after "12 June 2017".
Remove the comma after "filming of Class".
- All done -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release[edit]

Add a comma after "On 13 March 2017".
Add a comma after "Mackie, Moffat".
Add a comma after "Mackie, Lucas".
Add a comma after "Capaldi, Mackie".
"less episodes" → "fewer episodes"
"United States and Canada" → "the United States, and Canada"
Add a comma after "16 April in Australia".
- All done -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Every section here looks good.

Soundtrack[edit]

No issues here.

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Italics?[edit]

The other series, till yesterday bracketed by number, are italicised, but this one isn't. It should be, if one desires consistently, which all true discerning Wikipedia readers are. I don't know how to change it, well perhaps I could work it out, anyway if someone could sort that out, it would be a good job. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#Cobra Kai season articles. -- Alex_21_TALK 02:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]