Talk:Front Mission (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Line of sight

Was line of sight a factor in this game? For instance, were units limited in what they could shoot at by the presence of props or scenery like trees, walls, buildings, etc.? SharkD Talk 01:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC) It was not.[reply]
This and Front Mission 2 have easily the most generous form of weapon range as both short range and melee could strike the same enemies at the same distance at the same accuracy. Terrain only really became a factor starting in 3.-ZenithV (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Front Mission (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Front Mission (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080619063635/http://www.gemaga.com/2008/06/16/famitsu-top-500-of-2007 to http://www.gemaga.com/2008/06/16/famitsu-top-500-of-2007

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References for Original SNES/Super Famicom Release

We need reviews and development information for that release for both sections. Anyone have anything? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The remake of "Front Mission" should get its own page entry

We've had a bunch of remakes released over the past years and each one has gotten its own page to distinguish it from re-releases and remasters of an already released game. This includes the following games:

The original game was 2D and re-released on multiple consoles whereas the upcoming game will be a complete remake with 3D graphics. I think the page information for the remake should be separated from this one and made into its own. Considering that the upcoming Resident Evil 4 remake already has its own page despite not being out yet, Resident Evil 4 (2023 video game), we should do the same for the remake since it will be rebuilt from the ground up like the other games. Any thoughts? Freshpo (talk) 06:56, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If no one has any objections then I will make the move when the game gets released or if we get more information about the remake to fill the page. Freshpo (talk) 23:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About the SNES fan translation

Here is proof of my just removed edit that the Super Famicom version got an English fan patch. I don´t know how complete the 2001 patch was but the 2023 one is a full transition and doesn´t use the DS script: https://www.romhacking.net/games/306/ I have no idea how to source this but it exists. Proof of Gun Hazard´s fan translation is also documented on that site if that edit comes into question.

@77.64.146.133: - WP:VGSCOPE states that "Unless they are mentioned by independent reliable sources, unofficial translations should not be mentioned" - the translation itself on romhacking.net isn't a source showing notability. Waxworker (talk) 15:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]