Talk:Germaine Greer

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Germaine Greer article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 30 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Australia: Melbourne / Literature High‑importance

	Australia portal Germaine Greer is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Feminism High‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

External Links (last link listed): YouTube, Leeds Beckett University

This link is no longer available according to YouTube. I found only one working link to this interview, but it is on Wiki's blacklist, even though the link itself works via the YouTube handle dabbywabby1979. FYI, I could not find a comparable link on Leeds Beckett's YouTube channel. In light of this, should this external link be deleted all together and perhaps another link added to another interview? Epictetus68 (talk) 11:13, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification note

I have removed the clarification note that has just been added. I believe the meaning of the word "spiked" in this context is well-known and perfectly described what happens in these circumstances. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 02:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per my edit summary, I do not. Is it a colloquialism? On grounds of encyclopedic tone alone it is unsuitable. At best it is ambiguous. I asked if the intention was "tampered with? ceased? sabotaged?". If it is one of these, these terms are clear and unambiguous. "Spiked" is not. Mutt Lunker (talk) 10:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at online versions of the American Heritage, Cambridge, Chambers, Collins, Merriam-Webster and Longman dictionaries and a hard copy of Macquarie. Collins, only, lists "Journalism slang- to refuse (a story) by or as if by placing on a spindle". This as its 22nd listing for the verb, for American English, 13th for British English. Not one of the others does (Dictionary.com does but Collins is the source). We should not be using slang terms in an encyclopedia, particularly not apparently fairly obscure ones, so far down the list of possible other meanings of the word. I'll change it to "refused". Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]