Talk:Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
December 10, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2008.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct;

  • Yes. Because I am not as familiar with British English grammar, I have assumed that any eccentricities to my eyes are variations from American English.

(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.

  • Yes.
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

(a) it provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout;

  • Yes.

(b) at minimum, it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons;

  • Yes.

(c) it contains no original research.

  • Yes.
  3. Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;

  • Yes.

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

  • Yes.
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  • Yes.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • Yes.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

  • Yes.

(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

  • Yes.

I see no reason not to consider this a good article. Congratulations. JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Fixed —BillC talk 17:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)