Talk:Hinge and Bracket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Radio (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject LGBT studies / Person  (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the LGBT Person task force.

Repeated info[edit]

This is a very repetitive article. Much of the information is presented twice, or even three times. Would anyone mind if someone tried to reorganize the article? -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:21, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

I second that! There's a lot of really excellent material in the article, but it is in sore need of reorganising into coherence. I'd be willing to have a go myself, if there are no other volunteers – but not for a little while yet. – Tim riley (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, please do, Tim. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:43, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Removal of 'the appeal'[edit]

This whole section was written in a very non-encyclopedic way. I've got no problem with it being rewritten but for no I'm going to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Reinstatement of "The Appeal"[edit]

Will revisit style and breakdown of this section in due course. HBF109 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Needs some work[edit]

This article needs a major trim and sources. --John (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

NOT copied from other sources[edit]

I wrote the vast majority of this and so can vouch for it being my original text. Some paragraphs have been copied from here and reposted on the official H&B site. Which is fine with me. HBF109 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

What were your sources for what you have written though? You must cite them, or the material is original research. Mutt Lunker (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I started removing parts of the article before seeing this conversation. However, quite clearly has a copyright symbol for its content. Either it is a copyright violation or excessive original research and should be cut down to size. (talk) 01:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


If you must have a Latin plural for persona it should be personata. And the English plural personas would be much better. Guyal of Sfere (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)