Talk:John Carl Warnecke

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

List should be in chrono order

There have been a lot of great additions. Now that there's a proper list the buildings should be in chrono rather than alpha order. Americasroof (talk) 18:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What style manual says that? - Tim1965 (talk) 20:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

McHenry Library

User:169.233.37.10 has suggested that McHenry Library be added to the list of notable buildings designed by John Carl Warnecke. The library may, in itself, be notable. But is it architecturally notable? Warnecke didn't run the library, didn't fund it, didn't establish the Grateful Dead archives there. The list of notable works by Warnecke are architecurally notable works. Not everything Warnecke designed is architecturally notable. Some of it is kinda junky (yes, that's a technical term). What's needed is an unbiased, third-party, published (and inline) citation saying "this library is one of Warnecke's really outstanding architectural works" (sic). A citation from the university itself doesn't meet that unbiased criteria.

I would also suggest that, as good-faith as User:169.233.37.10's suggestion is, User:169.233.37.10 is using a UC-Santa Cruz computer (indicating the user is a staff member, student, or professor there). The suggested contribution, in my opinion, violates Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines unless it comes with a citation to a neutral, published, third-party source. - Tim1965 (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Carl Warnecke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote stacking

The footnote stacking in this article is pretty severe, exemplified by multiple footnotes presented for something as simple as date of birth. One, or at most two, footnotes should be provided for any line that involves a factual assertion with a modicum of uncertainty. Use the one best footnote for each fact. Dumping half a dozen — or more — footnotes throughout the article makes it MORE difficult for readers to verify an assertion which they may question. It also greatly hampers readability. Thanks. —tim /// Carrite (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]