Talk:Large Animal Games

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2014. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

COI, Cleanup

Heya. This article uses a lot of un-neutral (POV) language that needs to be removed. Descriptors like "talented, lucky enough, hard-working..." are not encyclopedic, and show a Point of View. Wikipedia entries are written from a neutral perspective. Please read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view carefully. Also, it has a lot of red links. If there are more red links than blue links, I'd remove them until some article stubs are written, or determine which links should lead to a quality article. Also, it uses first-person which is not encyclopedic. It should avoid words like "we've". If you are part of this venture, please read the policy regarding conflict of interest at WP:COI. - superβεεcat 18:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made changes. The POV stuff occurred because I copied parts of the description from the company's own page. I think now it looks like more like "just the facts." As a user, I wouldn't fall inline with the COI policy. ~saldb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saldb (talk • contribs) 19:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

anytime! Lemmie know if you need help. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) Also, please don't remove previous talk comments, it helps if the history is intact! - superβεεcat 19:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you never should copy anything directly, but use resources to form an article (citing your sources). A webpage by the company isn't usually a reliable resource, it's best to research reliable secondary sources and cite them (see WP:N). Cheers! - superβεεcat 19:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. I'll make a change Saldb 19:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Can someone help me move this page over to its redirect large animal games? Saldb 21:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Largeanimal logo.jpg

Image:Largeanimal logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]