Talk:Lavon Affair

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"False flag"[edit]

I have tagged all the uses of the phrase "false flag" as dubious. Please do not remove these tags. Instead, replace them with citations to reliable sources that specifically use the phrase "false flag" to describe the operation. If no such sources exist, then the phrase shouldn't be used at all. Wikiacc () 22:26, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Why is it dubious? The case is a clear false flag operation.Owain the 1st (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
I have removed your tags and put in links to an academic book on the subject.Owain the 1st (talk) 18:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

after being denied?[edit]

So, terrorists were "denied" appreciation by the Israeli Government? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.226.95.18 (talk) 11:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

  • It was the Israeli government which asked them to do it (although they obviously make their own life choices, and, as all people involved in such activities know, if you mess up - even if you succeed - all knowledge of you will be denied.) - 124.191.144.183 (talk) 13:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

"inconsistency in date of founding of Unit 101"[edit]

The article on Unit 101 says it was founded in 1953, this article says it was founded in 1948. - Metalello (talk) 02:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Fixed The problem was actually that the unit number in the article had been recently made incorrect. It was changed from 131 (correct) to 101 (incorrect). I fixed it and added a source for the unit number. Good catch. Zad68 13:07, 25 May 2012 (UTC)