Jump to content

Talk:Li Gu (Later Zhou)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved seeing as Li Gu (Han dynasty) has been created. No prejudice against a new RM if you make a new argument. Jenks24 (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Li Gu (Later Zhou)Li Gu – The other Li Gu's don't even have a page. Timmyshin (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - per WP:DAB we shouldn't really use "the other xxx doesn't have a page as an argument", especially in this case when the fictional Li Gu is covered in the second article. As for Li Gu (Han Dynasty) he also now has an article. His importance can be seen by the five pages in Aat Emile Vervoorn Men of the Cliffs and Caves 1990 9622014151 beginning from p.161 "One of these was the remarkable figure of Li Gu 李固 (94-147), who had himself been recommended to the court on the strength of his reputation as a disengaged scholar." In ictu oculi (talk) 01:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose following creation of Li Gu (Han dynasty); my Mandarin is sketchy, but according to the Chinese Wikipedia article on this subject, he appears to have been involved in some important palace intrigue; therefore, I can't see a primary topic between the two options as they now exist. bd2412 T 03:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.