Talk:List of fictional rapid transit stations

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 September 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

Article scope

Is this about London Underground stations or fictional metro stations in general? Simply south 21:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think they mean general. But the name implies otherwise. Pacific Coast Highway ^{{Kiss me! • I'm irish!}} 21:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the edit history to see if the page had been renamed – it hadn't. When created, the article contained only London Underground stations, and the lede paragraph was written as now. I would prefer a separate article for London Underground stations, but removing them would leave 'Fictional underground stations' as a stub.

Part of the problem is terminology. Those of us who have grown up with The Underground will use the term generically for any underground rail system: Paris has an 'underground' called The Metro, New York has an 'underground' called The Subway, etc. I suspect this was the case with the article creator.

EdJogg 00:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The way the article's written suggests it was meant for the Underground, as 95% of the entries are London-based and the topic sentence has a wiki link to the London Underground instead of rapid transit. I don't care either way, but we should probably decide explicitly so the article can be cleaned up to better suit its scope. If we lean towards general, I'd like to see

the article renamed...Fictional rapid transit stations is about as clear as it gets.
red links removed...face it, most of these wiki page wannabes will never exist. Drop wikilinking every fictional station, and if an appropriate article is added, link it.
non-UK stations added. Not that I can think of any. :)

Spamguy (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. EdJogg (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, sir. Spamguy (talk) 14:24, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Walfordeast.jpg

The image Image:Walfordeast.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Ashfield tube station

I've added a link to the West Ashfield tube station article in the "See also" template at the top of the "List of fictional London Underground stations" section. The station is not a real London Underground station, but is also not really fictional, as it it exists as a training facility, so I thought it would be a "see also", but feel free to add it into the list, if you think that is more appropriate. Big Mac (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of fictional rapid transit stations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100719091246/http://themole.site.aplus.net/ to http://themole.site.aplus.net/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://themole.site.aplus.net/tubecelebs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]