Talk:List of urban areas in the Republic of Ireland

2011 census

With the new census figures released, I think this page could do with an update. I would also suggest that this time around, to avoid any ambiguity, that only the population of the towns are included, rather than an arbitrarily adding 'environs'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.216.27 (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is is just me or is Rathkeale, Co.Limerick missing from this list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adro947 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Im not sure of this but I think in the 2011 Census, Rathkeales population dropped to below 2,000. ShaneMc2010 12:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This does not match the Census/CSO web page - Feargal Timon - limerick is closer to 57000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.38.227 (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2006 census

Perhaps it would be a good idea to create a new column on the right of this table and insert the 2006 census figures as they become available. This might avoid the reverts and inaccurate edits to the 2002 figures that have crept into this page. ww2censor 16:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 2006 preliminary results are out now, but not the final results. Only in the final results do we get the true populations for town and cities. (The preliminary results only give populations for areas within boundaries, whereas on this page we use full town/city population figures.) Once the 2006 final report comes out then the 2002 figures will be obsolete and we will of course be able to move wholesale to the 2006 figures.

I have two main bugbears about what is happening at present: 1) People do not actually read the page and see that the figures refer to the 2002 census. Even in the absence of a census, people still come up with all sorts of crazy figures, and add them in. 2) People have this annoying habit of only updating certain figures and not others! For example, the bloke I just reverted a while ago, promoted Celbridge to some spurious, non-2002 figure, while leaving almost every other town on the list with the 2002 figure. So not only did he use the wrong figure, but he also only updated? a few towns, thus creating a crazy, meaningless list of populations, allowing only for apples and oranges comparisons!

People's propensity either for stupidity or for saboutage beggars belief. (Had to get that out there. ;) ) Merlante 17:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah Merlante you are correct on all points. It is truly a pity some people who look at this encyclopaedia are actually unable to understand the meaning what they are reading. But that holds true for the rest of life too I see. Cheers ww2censor 18:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the columns for 2006 - does anyone have the figures? also does anyone know how to align the figures to the right-hand side of each cell?Peter Clarke 14:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say you've titled this page as 'List of Towns in the Republic of Ireland' when you've clearly just lumped all towns surronding any of the cities into one. Nearly all of the suburbs in the dublin jurisdiction are towns in their own right. Just saying this is quite misleading. Marc (from the town of Dundrum)

Tallaght

Where does Tallaght fit into all this? It's surprising that the Central Statistics Office includes it with Dublin and environs, considering its size, when Swords, on the other hand, is considered seperately. Ga2re2t (talk) 15:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is simply because Tallaght has been part of the contiguous built-up area of Dublin since the 1970s; Swords arguably still isn't due to the airport "exclusion zone" that maintained a tract of agricultural land between it and the city. The old Dun Laoghaire Borough was larger than modern Tallaght and had its own local Authority but the area was always included as part of the city environs because it was "joined-up" 100 years ago. Looking ahead, I'd say the way the whole area east of the airport; Clongriffin/"Northern fringe", Baldoyle, Portmarnock and Malahide are rapidly expanding and joining to each other and to Swords that in a 10 years Swords might find itself like Tallaght!(Sarah777 (talk) 00:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I can't see why this will make those cities a part of Dublin. Take a look at the San Francisco bay area. Allmost all the cities in that region actually make up one large megapole city but still keep their separate identities as cities, such as (anti-clockwise direction) San Francisco, San Mateo, Palo Alto, Mountain View, San Jose, Fremont, Hayward, Oakland and Berkeley. Ga2re2t (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Normally if the are contiguous they are regarded as a single city. Makes more geographical sense. Tallaght grew from 500 to 100,000 purely because it was a suburb of Dublin; ditto Swords. If Tallaght was in Mayo it would not be much bigger than it was in 1960. That's why Navan and Naas and Wicklow and Newbridge etc are regarded as part of the Greater Dublin Area. Sarah777 (talk) 19:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the county town of South Dublin County conspiciously absent? The population from the last 3 censuses would put Tallaght's population at around the size of Limerick. The above explanation poses hypothetical concepts and fails to address reality. Tallaght is one of the largest urban areas in the state and has a vast rural hinterland, satellite villages and suburban areas. It has been a county town since 1994 so after 24 years deserves some recognition. Jcully (talk) 20:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it has no legal boundaries. The Banner talk 22:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

County Fingal?

I think towns in Fingal should be listed as being in County Dublin for the following reasons.

Arguments for the change:-

"Traditionally", there are 26 counties in the Rep. of Ireland, and these counties are what most people would recognise.
County Tipperary is listed as one county, even though it was split into North and South under the Local Government Act, 2001. In my opinion, towns in Fingal should follow the same format and be listed as County Dublin.
According to Counties of Ireland, Ireland was subdivided into 29 counties for "administrative purposes". The majority of the population of Ireland would still consider there to be 26 counties in the Republic.

FreeT (talk) 03:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree totally. Sarah777 (talk) 19:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete info re: 2002

I think that the 2002 figures are now — 8 years later — irrelevant. I therefore suggest two things:

Removing the 2002 rankings and figures columns; and
Inserting a new column in their stead: a percentage increase from 2002 to 2006.

This would achieve both removing irrelevant information, and allowing one to rank towns according to population increases, which is now currently impossible. ConorBrady ^.ie (caint) 19:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have effected this change, and have also included a column showing the ranking change from 2002 to 2006. (cf Urban areas in Denmark.) ConorBrady ^.ie (caint) 08:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cork collage.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Cork collage.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests May 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Urban or Rural?

When a town is givin two (or 3) figures for population, namely rural, urban and environs, do you add them up or do you just take the Town figure? Some of the towns on this list contain both figures, and some just the town figure, so essentially the town will cause confusion until one is deceided. ShaneMc2010 12:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

This edit seems to have added Castlebar at the expense of Tralee, with several digits of the population number being identical. That doesn't seem right, or is it? 31.18.249.107 (talk) 22:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, correction done. — M-le-mot-dit (T) 10:42, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At least one guy is busy with a campaign to make Castlebar more important and bigger than it really is. Quite annoying, but reverting can fix that, here and everywhere. The Banner talk 21:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Balbriggan

Why is balbriggan even here!? All suburbs of the cities should be excluded from the list to give a more clear and accurate representation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brancott (talk • contribs) 00:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dungarvan is the county town of Waterford?

There seems to be no source for this, and it seems wrong both historically and administratively. Perhaps this refers to D. being the administrative centre of the "Waterford County" council area -- but that's now been merged back with the City, and it's the city that's the new admin centre. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 18:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a quick root around, on the Co Waterford page for links and the Dungarvan page for links, and it appears other than WCoCo webite is poor for navigating, you would be correct and its refernces are outdated. Murry1975 (talk) 18:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here they call it The administrative capital of the county (...) The Banner talk 20:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they do and so do other sources, but Waterford County Council is now administered with the City [1] And they have an amalgamation link to help. However an office for customer care will be open in Dungarvan, Tramore area office, Lismore area office, Kilmacthomas/Comeragh area office will all close. This office still deals with some aspects of administration, but not solely for the county. Murry1975 (talk) 20:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But do you have any prove that Dungarvan is NOT the county town anymore? I can't find that. The Banner talk 04:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment below. But importantly, WP doesn't claim things until they can be disproved, it states -- or should state, and claims that it will only state! -- things that can be verified.

From the merged council website, it appears that not only are "customer care centres" in both locations remaining open, but also the council meetings are (roughly) alternating between the two: Plenary Council meetings. Does that mean that it has two "administrative centres", or indeed two "county towns"? Unclear. Needs a reliable, current source. Really, the term "county town" might be better avoided entirely, unless sources directly use that concept, lest we WP:SYNTH the two together. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner, if I could find a proper source I would have removed it, hence why I left it. :)Murry1975 (talk) 16:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have found this source: Local Electoral Area Boundary Committee Report 2013. They state: The new local electoral area in the west of the county acknowledges the position and status of Dungarvan, which is currently the 'county' town of Waterford County Council and has a town council. page 124 ([2]) The Banner talk 23:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers the Banner, but anything from after the merger? Murry1975 (talk) 23:36, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why would they change the county towns? The same source refers to Ennis as county town with own town council. By now, it still is the county town (but without town council). We have proof that Dungarvan was the county town up to the 2014 local elections. There is no proof that that change in local government also changed the county towns. That would have left some traces. The Banner talk 00:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly that source is both on the one hand, using 'scare quotes' in regards to the term "county town", and on the other has been superseded by the merger. It can't be the "'county' town of Waterford County Council" when "Waterford County Council" no longer exists. The entity of which it was the admin centre was never the whole county in the first place, hence the need for the use-mention distinction -- the same report elsewhere uses "county town" for other such without any such qualification. The argument from silence is unconvincing because "county town" is not a formally defined term. What traces would informally changing an informal term leave? 79.97.71.180 (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but in my opinion you two are just doing difficult. There was proof that Dungarvan was de county toen. There is no proof that it is not the county town any more. Ergo: Dungarvan is still the county town. Case closed in my opinion. The Banner talk 16:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please WP:AGF. We're not being recreationally "difficult"; we'd like an article that's properly sourced, if (if it's as suspect as it seems), more accurate. Concisely: that's not what your evidence "proves". Your evidence is definitively out of date. Please refer back to my earlier points in this regard. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's in any case somewhat problematic to use the two concepts of "county town" and "administrative centre" synonymously. For example, one will immediately then conclude that the "county town" of "County Cork" isn't in said "County" at all, which is a... counter-intuitive result. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Found this PDF, it outlines that Dungarvan is still a county town, but Tramore(?) is not. Too many inconsitencies here. Murry1975 (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a reference back to the NSS, wherein "county and other large towns" are an identified category, so where Tramore is referred to thus, it's perhaps a shorthand for that wider category. And of course, Dungarvan was the County Council's administrative centre at the time of the NSS... 79.97.71.180 (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion on "county town" colour-coding

I suggest we clarify that we're using the green highlighting for present administrative centre, rather than for historic (or ad hoc described) "county towns". That avoids having to wonder what Dublin is the "county town" of in any sense that Waterford isn't, for example. Thus Co. Waterford will have two such, which is what's sourceable. We can further clarify this by adding footnotes for the non-trad council areas, and so on. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I object strongly. And I have not seen sources that Waterford is the legal county town, now or historic., of county Waterford. The Banner talk 22:47, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Strongly' object, OK, but on any particular basis? I'm struggling to see "sourcing" as connected with this, because as I've pointed out, the whole point is to improve the sourcing. "County town" not a legal concept, that's the entire problem. Hence the lack of any source in the article, the lack of any mention of it in the legislation, the lack of any formal or current mention on the merged council website. Hence in turn, the suggestion that we replace claims we can't source, with ones that we can. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dublin is, or has been recently, divided into ~~three~~ administrative divisions including County Fingal. (edit, according to County_Dublin#Local_government_and_politics, it is now four, Fingal, Dublin, South Dublin and Dún Laoghaire–Rathdown)

Dungarvan is referred to as the county town based on it being a town and the city not being one. Waterford city is not only the capital of the county, but it is the capital of the South Eastern administrative region with regional headquarters for revenue and land registry the most obvious, and leading facility for things like medicine, education, likely industry and international trade and other stuff. The title is not contentious. there is no confusion here as to which urban center is more significant. Dungarvan would be called the county town in the city as well, but that is a reference to its significance as a town rather than its authority over the city, which it couldn't forseeably have.

I have searched around a bit and a reference may prove illusive, but I can vouch for the title being used as such without contention or recognition of the contrast locally if that can help for the mean time. It's definitely published repeatedly in reputable resources so it bears use on the article, perhaps with a note that it is not a comparison to the city. If you think about it, as the town is a town, it's actually more correct in the literal sense so it is a matter of opinion rather than of accuracy. ~ R.T.G 15:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edited first paragraph ~ R.T.G 16:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But do you have sources that call Waterford the county town? The Banner talk 18:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the minutes of a gevernment discussion [3] where upgrades are proposed and discussed on the basis that Dungarvan is a county town under the remit of Waterford city. It verifies usage for us here but I do not think a request to upgrade the post office is a very scholarly resource for actual citation on the article. ~ R.T.G 23:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It only proves the fact that Dungarvan was the county town in 1967. But that Dáil Éireann is in fact about the status of the Post Office, not about waterford City or Dungarvan. The Banner talk 23:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the county cojncil calling it the county town [4], even if the councils are amalgamated, it's still an official document. Book about ireland, 2010 [5]. Another book [6]. Ecyclopaedia Britannica [7]. Irish examiner [8]. And doubtless there are more to find but most of them are from tourism websites and reproductions of WP so it takes a lot of looking through. None are actually about granting the title or what it means to call the town that when there is a city or anything, so it's only evidence of use. ~ R.T.G 23:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I was asking if you have evidence that Waterford is or was the county town. The Banner talk 23:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe I am catching the sense you mean by. Are you asking for evidence that Waterford is the capital major urban center, or that it has the title of county town? If you are seeking the origin of Dungarvan being called county town, so was I and though I didn't stay at it for an extended period, I didn't find anything much. If you are asking for evidence that Waterford is a more significant urban center... It would be difficult to give you a resource without telling me what to compare because Waterford is not only the capital center of the county, you should read this South-East_Region,_Ireland. Waterford is the capital of the entire region in every sense. More than double any other urban center in any sense you can think of. as for the origin of calling it to Dungarvan... I'd bet if the library in Dungarvan couldn't tell you that, nobody could, but the internet has a lot of books on it too. ~ R.T.G 00:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tipperary county town

A very similar issue to the above seems to arise with regard to County Tipperary, Nenagh, and Clonmel. The article on each of these towns claims it to be the "county town". Other articles list both, or just Nenagh. None give sources. The merged council, much as with Waterford, lists administrative offices in both locations, and appears to be holding council meetings in both, too. This is an almighty mess. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tipperary is divided into north and south for administrative purposes. It's even on car registration numbers, TN and TS. Nenagh is in Tipperary North and Clonmel in Tipperary South. ~ R.T.G 15:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tipperary North and Tipperary South were both abolished and merged on 3rd June 2014. ManfromDelmonte (talk) 11:46, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ballincollig

I see that Ballincollig Co. Cork has been excluded from the list. The urban area is not included in Cork City's population and has itself a population of 17,368 bringing it within the remit of this list. Surely Ballincollig therefore should be included in this list ? ManfromDelmonte (talk) 11:43, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need to do that, The list is complied based on this census-related source. Ballincollig is not mentioned in that list. Secondly, with this table you can see that the Cork numbers are those of city and suburbs. The Banner talk 15:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of urban areas in the Republic of Ireland by population. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire

RESOLVED

Consensus is that the OR/SYNTH around Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire (and other "small" or "composite" county towns) should be removed. Along with the other complex notation around county towns generally

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi. In a recent series of edits, an "additional table" was added to the article (including the county towns which were felt to be 'missing' from the main table). While I didn't initially have concerns with this in principle, the numbers added were not sourced.

In seeking to validate the numbers for Lifford and Carrick, I checked the Census 2016 SAPMAP database, and found and corrected the numbers for both of these locations.

I could not however easily find or verify numbers for Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire. Hence the {{fact}} tags added. Since then, I have had a look to see where the numbers (seemingly taken from the Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire) were originally sourced.

On Tallaght, looking at the "notes" in the references for that article, it seems that, to arrive at the "76,119" number, someone searched the E2013 (population by Electoral Division) database for every ED that started with "Tallaght". While, using this method, I found the same result (below), this seems more than a little like OR/SYNTH. As the resulting area is quite large. Spreading as it does as far east as the Walkinstown roundabout. (Counting, for example, the residents of Greenhills/Walkinstown as if they are residents of the "town" of Tallaght seems a little bit of a stretch to me). Personally I wonder if we should be using this number here (or indeed in the Tallaght article). At least without some kind of qualification.

"Population Density and Area Size 2011 to 2016 by Electoral Division, Census Year and Statistical indicator"[9]
(EDs starting with "Tallaght")
	Population - 2011 (Number)	Population - 2016 (Number)
028 Tallaght-Avonbeg, South Dublin	1,613	1,538
029 Tallaght-Belgard, South Dublin	1,694	1,692
030 Tallaght-Fettercairn, South Dublin	7,607	8,380
031 Tallaght-Glenview, South Dublin	1,723	1,934
032 Tallaght-Jobstown, South Dublin	16,630	17,824
033 Tallaght-Killinardan, South Dublin	3,915	3,958
034 Tallaght-Kilnamanagh, South Dublin	4,452	4,386
035 Tallaght-Kiltipper, South Dublin	8,068	8,478
036 Tallaght-Kingswood, South Dublin	3,974	3,996
037 Tallaght-Millbrook, South Dublin	3,290	3,386
038 Tallaght-Oldbawn, South Dublin	4,527	4,579
039 Tallaght-Springfield, South Dublin	9,123	11,012
040 Tallaght-Tymon, South Dublin	4,888	4,956

	71,504	76,119

On Dún Laoghaire, I could find absolutely nothing that supported the 38,761 number. Using the same method as above, I searched the the E2013 (population by Electoral Division) database for every ED that started with "Dún Laoghaire". However, as below, even with this method (which drags in places as far south as Sallynoggin/Kill o' the Grange), the result is still 12,000 shy of the unreferenced number in the article.

"Population Density and Area Size 2011 to 2016 by Electoral Division, Census Year and Statistical indicator" [10]
(EDs starting with "Dún Laoghaire")
	Population - 2011 (Number)	Population - 2016 (Number)
042 Dún Laoghaire-East Central, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	2,234	2,489
043 Dún Laoghaire-Glasthule, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	2,760	2,807
044 Dún Laoghaire-Glenageary, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	1,922	1,929
045 Dún Laoghaire-Monkstown Farm, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	2,095	2,225
046 Dún Laoghaire-Mount Town, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	1,734	1,779
047 Dún Laoghaire-Sallynoggin East, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	2,866	2,860
048 Dún Laoghaire-Sallynoggin South, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	1,354	1,441
049 Dún Laoghaire-Sallynoggin West, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	1,884	2,886
050 Dún Laoghaire-Sandycove, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	3,690	3,690
051 Dún Laoghaire-Salthill, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	1,623	1,729
052 Dún Laoghaire-West Central, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown	2,368	2,690

	24,530	26,525

In any event, I'd be interested to hear others' thoughts on whether or what to include in this "List" article. For Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire. (Or whether we should remove the "additional table" entirely - as based largely on SYNTH.) And, be extension, what anyone thinks about the numbers in the Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire articles themselves. Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the entire County Towns element of this article should be removed. The whole point of urban areas is that they have nothing to do with political boundaries, while the whole point of a county town is to identify a place for administrative (ie political) functions. I suggest removing this table, and also getting rid of the green colouring in the main table. If there is a need for information on county towns, that should really have its own article, as it is separate and different to the concept of urban areas.

ConorBrady ^.ie (caint) 09:17, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As above, I'm more than happy to see the "county towns that aren't census towns or aren't very big" section removed. As per the referencing and inclusion criteria issues noted above. In terms of removing the "green highlight" from the main table, I don't really have a strong opinion on that. It does seem to have been at least a partial trigger for the editor who added the "also ran" table. And hence perhaps more trouble than its worth. But it might need at least a short period for consensus to be established (or at least give a chance for objections) before removing it. Guliolopez (talk) 10:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with the proposal

On the other hand, how to you define an "urban area"? Staying close to home, you have Ennis and next to it is Clarecastle, but that seems to be outside the urban area of Ennis. The Banner talk 12:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Guliolopez, for your painstaking work on these tables and on this issue. I would support both removing the article's smaller table and no longer highlighting county towns.

The Dublin city and suburbs SAPMAP population already includes Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire. Unless there is some other CSO data that breaks out constituents of Dublin, I agree that calculating Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire populations from electoral districts is OR/SYNTH. Population figures on Ireland town articles are often vandalised or misrepresented. Consistently using SAPMAP keeps things straight and easily verifiable. I'd go so far as to advocate for removing population figures from the Infoboxes for non-SAPMAP Dublin suburbs and, especially for larger places like Tallaght and Dún Laoghaire, putting a note in the population field referring to their inclusion in the Dublin number.

As for county towns, having the county and town articles mentioning them seems sufficient. Irish county towns are just not as commonly referred to as, say, US state capitals. And in many cases the namesake town is the county town anyway. Declangi (talk) 05:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I support the removal of both the county town table and the county town green shading for the same reasons as already mentioned above Tyireland (talk) 17:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved OK. Thanks all. I've gone ahead with the change/removal/simplification. Closing thread. Cheers! Guliolopez (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2022 Census

This list can be updated now with today's release of the 2022 census results regarding City and Town population figures, available at [11]https://data.cso.ie/ on table F1015 23stat23stat (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scope

Hi. While the recent scope extensions (from the 100 most populous areas/census towns, to 150, to 200, to 250) are all great, I wonder if we should stop there. While I appreciate that nobody is proposing or hinting at further additions, IMO we should stop at 250. With Kilpedder. Which, until relatively recently, had a population of 400 odd and is still, perhaps, best described as a village. (If we go further, we may start to stretch the definition of an "urban area". Like those places in the States that are "cities" in an academic "name only" kinda way). Otherwise, if we are to "keep going", what's our cutoff/scope? Guliolopez (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Urban areas in the 1200 inhabitants range is a bit far fetched. With the next extension my own village van be in the list. :-)

A limitation to the top 100 areas or areas with 5000 or more inhabitants seems a better idea. The Banner talk 23:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My medium term aim was to include all urban areas with more than 1000 inhabitants in the most recent census, which would bring the list to just over 300. Whatever its recent population, Kilpedder is certainly above the 400 mark now. We have different versions of this list based on the censuses going back to 2002, with some being more expansive than others. Aside from the time it would take, I don't see the harm in a fully inclusive list, if someone were to add all 2022 urban areas. It would take time to build, but someone accessing Wikipedia in 2053 to do demographic analyses would surely find these of use. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 19:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]