Talk:Liu Kang

Liu Kang has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 9, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
July 14, 2023	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited

Current status: Good article

Video games: Characters Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as High-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Liu Kang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Liu Kang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liu Kang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

LiuKangMK1Render.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the most recent image really neccesary?

Fire God Liu Kang is a major evolution of the character and a far cry from how he is generally depicted (Mascot kung fu hero guy). I feel like Fire God Kang ought be an image placed in the "NetherRealm Studios titles" section, whilst we revert back to his non-god MK11 model for the main image.

Also, while I don't think it's neccesary, I'd suggest an image of his normal and zombie appearance in the "In Midway Games" section. I will gladly find said image if ya'll agree MayDay2099 (talk) 17:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE copy edit notes

A few notes for @Tintor2:

There appears to be a lot of cites to tweets from the game devs and others; are there more secondary sources that discuss the game's development?
I found at least one instance where a quote was not put in quotation marks; please double check to make sure that all sources are properly attributed.
Some of the cites don't line up with what's in the text. It would be a good idea to do a more extensive cite check.
I added some {{clarify}} tags throughout.
Removed the analysis from Medium in reception because it's by a random blogger.
Some of the cites don't have the author parameter included.
In general, I think the reception section could use some reorganization to clarify which series entries are being reviewed.

voorts (talk/contributions) 16:24, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]