Jump to content

Talk:Livedoor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note on capitalization

[edit]

The official homepage of livedoor [1] uses the style "livedoor" (no caps).

All news sources that I've seen use "Livedoor".

  • BBC [2]
  • Asahi Shimbun (English) [3]
  • Forbes [4]
  • People's Daily Online (English) [5]

--Writtenonsand 19:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But note that Flickr uses no caps in its logo, as well. Ashibaka tock 09:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added additional news source

[edit]

Added an additional news source on the presumed suicide of Hideaki Noguchi, as I've noticed that the Yahoo news pages tend to disappear fast. --Writtenonsand 19:24, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bourse?

[edit]

This word appears under "Fraud allegations" but isn't commonly known or linked. Mike 21:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that too. It looks like that sentence was copied from a news source. I have changed "the bourse" to "it". --DylanW 22:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bourse is the British (Commonwealth) English (via French for a stock exchange, though it is usually used in reference to European exchanges. I left it when I did an editing pass because I'm accustomed to reading it, but perhaps it is too much of a term of art to be considered common. It is listed in Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, though... HTH, Jim_Lockhart 11:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That Merriam-Webster Unabridged link doesn't work for people who are not subscribed members. This Merriam-Webster OnLine entry says "EXCHANGE 5a; specifically : a European stock exchange" (like you mentioned above), so it's probably best not used for this article. --DylanW 22:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. But if it's good enough for the Financial Times (which is cited several times as a source), it's good enough for me... I would leave it, if not just to motivate those who don't know it to look it up. Some people come to Wikipedia to pick up on field-specific word usage, and bourse is a word people interested in exchanges and related subjects should know. HTH, Jim_Lockhart 23:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I mostly agree with you. I wouldn't object to putting it back, although I wouldn't do it myself because like you and Merriam-Webster said, it is usually used in reference to European exchanges, and this article of course is talking about the Japanese exchange. --DylanW 03:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fraud?

[edit]

The story as it stands is very unspecific as to what kind of fraud is being alleged...

The article says, "On March 16, 2007, Livedoor's founder was sentenced to 2.5 years in jail. The company is scheduled to go public in the next 6 to 12 months." Where did you get the information that the company is scheduled to go public? I've searched extensively, and I can't find any information on this.

Offload vs Unload

[edit]

To me, there's a slight semantic difference between these two words. Offloading better describes what happened in Tokyo last week because investors—particularly day traders and individual investors—were selling the shares in a panic to get rid of them. Herd mentality played a part, but (this is my opinion here) Japanese investors were reading the wind and trying to get rid of livedoor shares before they became worthless, something they were worried about because they sense that the raids and media bashing are politically motivated. In any case, to me, unloading shares is something people (such as insiders) do quietly when they know bad news is in the offing; whereas offloading is something they do to get rid of shares quickly. Any thoughts? Jim_Lockhart 02:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know enough about the difference between the two words in this context. To me, "unload" gives the impression of dumping. What do other people think? --DylanW 03:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent a feeler out to a colleague who edits financial material to see what she says. Will report back. Have a good one, Jim_Lockhart 07:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting back: The colleague says the two words are pretty much synonymous, but she uses offload. An "offload shares" vs "unload shares" googlefight (http://www.googlefight.com/) yields 684,000-2.06mn googits, and combination of them with "stock" and "the issue" brings similar results, so the numbers are on your side! <g> HTH, Jim_Lockhart 14:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for getting back. Marriam-Webster says they're synonymous too, so either way is fine with me. --DylanW 19:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Current Events

[edit]

This is no longer a current event, stop saying it is.

I'm not insisting on calling it a current event, but just out of curiosity: What is your definition of a current event? The story of Livedoor's execs' being arrested and the scandal still dominate the Japanese news, and it's still making the front-page headlines of the Financial Times; I wouldn't be surprised if there were an article in this week's Economist and other business journals as well. That sounds like a current event to me. Or am I missing something about the tag? Jim_Lockhart 00:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I felt the same way. I wasn't sure why 207.6.50.92 keeps removing the current event tag, and without explanation. My theory was that he's an executive at the company and wants less attention drawn to the scandal. --DylanW 02:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After writing the above, I checked 207.6.50.92's edit history and felt like a fool for even bothering to write this comment—it looks like this person is just a grump or a troll. I think the article is still current and will be for a while so long as we continue to update it.
Fwiw, Horie and a few others have been removed from their positions of authority, and a new man from a subsidiary previously owned by Sony has been named president. One of the mid-day TV news programs characterized today as Livedoor's first day "wearing a proper suit and tie." Anyhow, the company is moving to get back to and get on with business. Despite the characterizations in the (almost by definition hostile) Japanese broadcast media, Livedoor is not just a Japanese Enron—its mainstay is the provision of real products and services. HTH, Jim_Lockhart 03:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Failed business?

[edit]

As of today, liverdoor is still a viable business (i.e., it has not "failed" in the usual sense of the word), and it does not necessarily fulfill the other definitions mentioned in the definition at List of notable business failures. It is, in fact, viable enough a company that the owner of Usen has put up his own money to buy a large stake. (This and several other events have not be added to the article.) HTH Jim_Lockhart 08:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Livedoor-logo.gif

[edit]

Image:Livedoor-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Livedoor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Livedoor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Livedoor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

News division

[edit]

How reliable would news.livedoor.com be as a source? Is it still basically just a blog? Any editors? I noticed that this article from comicbook.com (no idea if that is a good source either) cited this tweet which used this article as a source, but not sure how much stock to put in its details. ScratchMarshall (talk) 22:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Choose Yen or Dollars

[edit]

Under the "Sale" section, the offer price and sale price are listed in billions of Dollars and billions of Yen, respectively. This is a little misleading, and one or the other should be converted to maintain consistency. Dollar value makes sense on the English page, but it was a Japanese company, and the deal was likely made in Yen, so either are valid, but having both is confusing. 192.77.12.11 (talk) 08:18, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Livedoor&oldid=1208529566"