Talk:Max Ernst

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Smithsonian Institution: Archives of American Art Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Archives of American Art.

Photography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 2, 2017.

Concentration Camp?

This article says:

Following the onset of World War II, Ernst was detained as an enemy alien but with the assistance of the American journalist Varian Fry in Marseille, he managed to escape the country with Peggy Guggenheim.

..but the Leonora Carrington article says he was put into a German concentration camp:

The new couple collaborated and supported each other's artistic development until the German's invaded their French village and took Ernst to a concentration camp in 1940.

..and this article has no mention of Leonora Carrington. Can someone more knowledgeable on this subject help to clarify this ambiguity?-Eric 05:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Movie title

Should the movie title "Dangerous Correspondance" have the existing French spelling or should it be the English spelling: "Dangerous Correspondence"? --darklilac 21:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age?

at the beginning of the article, it says:

"Max Ernst (April 2, 1891 – April 1, 1976) was a German dadaist and surrealist artist."

..however, "under Life" it reads:

"Max Ernst was born in Bruhl, Germany. In 1910, he enrolled in the University of Bonn to study philosophy but soon abandoned the courses."

..should the sentence be changed? I know it's imparting that he enrolled at the age of 19, but upon initial scanning, i in error thought it was stating that he was (incorrectly) born in 1910.

--Threatis 12:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Important paintings

This section is an important and essential part of this article, demonstrating the paintings Visually. It is necessary in order to correctly understand Max Ernst the Surrealist painter. Modernist 12:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section violates ~~WP:NFCC~~. Rette tast 10:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to your opinion - I Don't Think So. - Modernist 16:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC) see sections 5 through 10 in the policy you cite! or see WP:NFC section 2.3. and see WP:WPFU.[reply]

Rette tast - You can express an opinion here or here: [1]

Under WP:NFC and WP:UCS - per WP:NFC see acceptable images #7, per WP:UCS - should be obvious, All these images have valid Fair Use Rationales, including one image that has its own article, and they illustrate in this article an important Visual artist's pioneering innovations that cannot be described any other way. A matter of opinion here and I do not agree with you. Modernist 12:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is definitely established that certain use of non-free image content is allowed for art. However, the images should be anchored in the text, which should refer to them. At the moment this does not happen. There are too many images for the amount of text, and the images cannot be relied on alone to convey the meaning. If the text were expanded and the images referred to specifically, then inclusion could probably be justified. Non-free use should be kept to a minimum and to the essential. At the moment, the non-free use is excessive in relation to the existing text, and some could be justified, but not so many. So: expand text or remove some of the images. Tyrenius 15:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, frankly the gallery worked much better. I'll reduce the number of images. Modernist 15:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the original selection of images was a little excessive. Still I hold the opinion that in an article about a visual artist it is sometimes necessary to include several examples of thier work when that artist's career spans a wide varity of styles over a long period of time. I think that the selection of images used now represents the most important examples of Ernst's work. I have also decided to re-include Ubu Imperator as it is on of Ernst's most famous works. Justin Foote 00:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yet again Ive removed the images that shouldnt be in the article right now. Unless there is critical commentary about the images dont use them. you cant just show a list of major works. If you want to do something like that, research the background, history, and affects of the image, and then the use of the image may be used. Using images without showing that the article must have the image isnt allowed. create the text that requires the images, dont just list the images. β^_command 01:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added two paintings from 1937-1942. The text concerning World War II supports the two paintings from the period 1937 through 1942. Don't remove them, they visually depict what cannot be depicted with words. Modernist 04:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I re-included Ubu Imperator as it is one of Ernst's most famous works. See remarks above by Justin Foote. - Modernist 14:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Selected paintings?

The selected paintings list is entirely too long, and does not seem the least bit "selected." This needs to be trimmed by at least half. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 05:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult to know how to prune this list. I know what's notable in terms of stylistic innovation, public recognition, etc, and it would seem obvious to include some of the best examples of different eras & styles, such as collages, assemblages, decalcomanias, sculptures, etc. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 12:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and that is why I did not edit the list last night. There really has to be a discussion first. But, at this point, that list is longer than the rest of the article. How many of those works have separate articles? ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 15:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Making space

It looks like the picture of Ernst as a young man will be deleted. Modernist (talk) 12:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it will be missed. Are you deleting it? ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 15:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's up for debate on Commons, but given there is an image of Ernst with Dorothea, I can't get too excited about losing this one. It's copyright status is moot, but I guess the Commons guys know about this sort of thing. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 15:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I was not aware it was up for debate. Regardless, I really cannot get exercised about it. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not my point, - I mentioned it because there will be room for another image once it goes. In fact if you want to place a different image there - say one of the paintings it might work. Modernist (talk) 23:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting idea, and my opinion would be that it could be one that even a casual reader would probably be familiar with, such as The Elephant Celebes. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 23:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather use a picture that isn't currently being used. The Elephant Celebes is currently the lead image on Surrealism. Little Machine Constructed by Minimax Dadamax in Person (1919-1920) or The Hat Makes the Man (1920) might work. - Modernist (talk) 04:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Max deserves much more e-Ink in Wikipedia

For example, "La femme cent têtes" has no entry in Wikpedia. A few suggestions as to where we can begin to expand this section:

1. In addition to Met catalog of 2005 (haven't seen); the catalog of the stellar retrospective at the Guggenheim in 1975, edited by Diane Waldman. Contributions by her would be ideal if she is available; see http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE3D6103DF934A35750C0A965958260

2. Leonora Carrington is about 91. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2007/jan/02/art#article_continue

3. French and German language Wikipedia entries for Ernst (not so hot, but may have something relevant).

4. Metropolitan Museum of Art surrealism show in 2002 http://www.metmuseum.org/special/se_event.asp?OccurrenceId=%7B694886C2-280A-11D5-93F2-00902786BF44%7D

This show included:

Men Shall Know Nothing of This http://www.metmuseum.org/special/surrealism_desire_unbound/2.L.htm and The Robing of the Bride http://www.metmuseum.org/special/surrealism_desire_unbound/10.L.htm

5. Possibly the museum: http://www.maxernstmuseum.lvr.de/

6. Understanding private content issues, perhaps journalists for the Guardian and the NY Times (Russell) might be contacted and asked to contribute: http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2003/dec/06/art http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE2DA1139F93AA15752C0A96F948260&sec=&spon=&&scp=1&sq=max%20ernst%20russell%201989&st=cse

A few additional observations/recommendations:

a. Wikipedia lists should ALWAYS be in alphabetical order - take this to every page you edit. It is a huge hassle to redo a list in random (or author favored) order. Chronological lists are fine for catalogs, but not encyclopedias, unless they are so subtitled.

b. Ernst's greatest hits shouldn't be commented merely because there are no associated articles. La femme, Two children and And the butterflies are mandatories.

c. When listing artworks, the French/German/English issue is pertinent for Ernst. Recommend English with original language title in parentheses.

Building out this section will be a real pleasure for everyone who contributes. Thank you in advance.

Dstlascaux (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly some expansion would be desirable, I have the catalogue for the Tate Gallery 1991 retrospective, but not to hand, and there is lots of useful information in it. I also doubt that lists must be alphabetical, per Wikipedia:Lists#Organization, in fact it's customary to list a director's or actor's films, or a band's recordings, in chronological order. --Rodhull andemu 12:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:MaxErnstLouisiana.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:MaxErnstLouisiana.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know Im a nooob sorry.

Sorry to bug you guys, Im a noob here. Max Ernst is my favorite painter of all time. I really, really appreciate you guys writing an article about him. If I ever figure out how Wikipedia works I'll try to contribute. And whoever found that brilliant photo of Max and Dorothea? Wow just wow!

Anyone remember the crazy Love Triangle poor Max got mixed up in?

174.21.19.236 (talk) 09:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Known for his poetry?

In the infobox it says he was known for "painting, sculpture, and poetry" and yet nothing is said about his poetry. May I suggest that either something about it be added or that "poetry" be removed? DBlomgren (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Ernst. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150706214957/http://www.guggenheim.org/new-york/collections/collection-online/search/?q=76.2553.71 to http://www.guggenheim.org/new-york/collections/collection-online/search/?q=76.2553.71

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Max morise, max ernst e andré masson, cadaveri eccellenti (cadavre exquis), 1927.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

I've improved the reference formatting on the article. I've also completed incomplete information, improved the quality of references (e.g. adding page numbers and convenience links), and rm inappropriate refs.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Houghton Typ 915.22.3605 Répétitions, 1922 - frontispiece.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]