Jump to content

Talk:McEwan's

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMcEwan's has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 15, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
October 17, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Up to date reference please

[edit]

Can I see a proper current ref for "The majority of the draught beers are brewed at the Caledonian Brewery in Edinburgh" please? --John (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citation 19 and 20 in the main body of the article. It's Wikipedia convention not to have references in the intro, as that merely summarises the main body, where the citations are. Farrtj (talk) 21:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
These are from 2004 and 2005, which is why I asked for an up to date reference for the claim. Do you have one? --John (talk) 21:18, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it would be good if you'd actually looked through the article first. Citation 22 and 23 are from late 2011. [1] [2] Farrtj (talk) 22:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They are, but neither seem to support the claim that "the majority of the draught beers are brewed at the Caledonian Brewery in Edinburgh", a claim that isn't actually made in the article body so far as I can see, therefore it's perfectly reasonable to ask for that to be cited in the lead. Malleus Fatuorum 22:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bitter tidings

[edit]

As our article bitter (beer) quite rightly says, "bitter" is only an English term for this type of beer. In Scotland we would call it "heavy" or "80/-". I think the article needs to get usage correct. It looks somewhat incongruous to describe a Scottish pint as being a "bitter". --John (talk) 12:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the regional heads up. I guess it's pretty incongruous for an Englishman to be working on the McEwan's page! Farrtj (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work in correcting this, and on the article in general. I'll let you off for calling Scotland a "region" as you're obviously a good guy to take such an interest in one of our staple products. --John (talk) 14:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully Scots won't let their national beer wither on the vine! Although Deuchars IPA is tastier... Farrtj (talk) 14:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't agree more. Had a couple last night that were delicious. --John (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hectolitres?

[edit]

Why are all the measurements in Hectolitres? Surely, Kilolitres and Megalitres would be far more recognisable and appropriate units.

ie

The second highest selling canned premium ale in the UK. In cans, it sold over 3 megalitres in 2012.

rather than

The second highest selling canned premium ale in the UK. In cans, it sold over 30,000 hectolitres in 2012.

or

A Burton or Edinburgh ale, a style known locally as "Wee Heavy". Available across the United Kingdom in 500ml bottles, it is one of the top twenty highest selling bottled ales, selling around 700 kilolitres in 2012.

rather than

A Burton or Edinburgh ale, a style known locally as "Wee Heavy". Available across the United Kingdom in 500ml bottles, it is one of the top twenty highest selling bottled ales, selling around 7,000 hectolitres in 2012.

HaniiPuppy (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Within the brewing industry, hectolitres is the internationally recognised measuring scale for brewery output. As you have realised, it's not common in other industries. For example here in Australia if a new brewhouse comes online it's described as "The new 30m Hectolitre plant at...". Here's another typical example from a trade journal in the USA describing a Mexican brewery: "Constellation Brands plans to double of the capacity of its new Piedras Negras brewery in Mexico to 20m hectolitres within three years..." --MichaelGG (talk) 03:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on McEwan's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on McEwan's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Current product range

[edit]

'A Burton or Edinburgh ale, a style known locally as "Wee Heavy".' Not true. The style is called strong ale in Scotland, Scotch ale outside Scotland. "Wee heavy" is a specific term for a small ("wee") bottle of strong ("heavy") beer. See Ron Pattinson, Scotland!, Amsterdam 2012, p288 Zythophile (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:McEwan%27s&oldid=1208912505"