This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
More than once, the George Floyd article has been added as a "See also" link at the bottom of this article, as seen here. Does anyone know what the purported connection between Vanessa Guillén and George Floyd would be in this regard? AzureCitizen (talk) 02:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CookieMonster755: I noticed you added back the sexual assault category a few minutes ago after I swapped it out the other day with the sexual harassment category. From what I understand, Guillen told her family she was being sexual harassed and was going to report the offender (presumably Robinson, who the family believes killed her after she confronted him about reporting him on 22 April), but did not allege that he had sexually assaulted her. Can you explain the rationale for adding the sexual assault category? Thanks, AzureCitizen (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article currently includes the text 'CID reported that they found no evidence that Guillén was assaulted', so it does seem slightly odd at the moment, unless further facts emerge suggesting that sexual assault was a factor in this case. Robofish (talk) 23:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll remove the category for now, pending further comments or developments in the reporting here. Thanks, AzureCitizen (talk) 23:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resistance to investigation is not mentioned[edit]
I looked up this article because of the VanessaGuillen meme on the internet, which is all about the institutionalized attempts to bury this case without investigation.
This article does not even hint at this aspect of it. The article, as it stands, appears to be a poster child about a murder that prompted a forthcoming investigation which successfully dealt with a toxic community where sexual harassment was acceptable.
because the conspiracy theories being pushed on social media didn’t actually exist?
Besides, it is covered in he article. "her mother told reporters she did not trust the U.S. Army's handling of the investigation, and her attorney, Natalie Khawam,[15] said she believed the family was "being kept in the dark"[14] because few details had been released regarding Guillén's disappearance." JeffUK (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't the article be at killing of Vanessa Guillén, since the perpetrator was not convicted in court because he committed suicide? cookie monster755 18:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
