Jump to content

Talk:Nisei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Need for article on the Nisei

[edit]

A couple of comments from other editors are persuasive evidence that this article is necessary:

  • Major gap in Japanese-American history. ... I'm currently in Wiki-crisis/retirement mode, and not editing here. But I came across what I think is a major issue which touches on your area of editing interest. There is no real article on the Nisei (2nd generation Japanese Americans). The "Nisei" page is a redirect to Japanese American service in World War II (just one small aspect of this generation), and even this article has been recently stubbed down when material (such as the quote from MacArthur's chief ("The Nisei saved countless Allied lives and shortened the war by two years.") could have been easily sourced instead. Here for example. About the nisei generation, just a quick Amazon search brings up dozens of books on this generation of Japanese Americans... Even Encylcopedia Britannica has an article on the subject! Something seems to be clearly wrong here .... 13 September 2008 (UTC)

The article is sure to develop beyond the initial stub text, but surely there can be no disputing that it deserves to be expanded -- not deleted. --Tenmei (talk) 14:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let me ask, what's specifically so unique about Nisei that is not also characteristics of Sansei, Yonsei, and even higher generations? What I'm saying is, it seems that the content for an article on Nisei either can be covered in Japanese American, or it would be the same kind of content for an article on Sansei and Yonsei. So what is so unique specifically about second-generation Japanese Americans that we need an article for the topic? Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 15:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please add: Citation for Isamu Noguchi, http://www.noguchi.org/chrono2.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kactapuss (talk • contribs) 16:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming article?

[edit]

This title attempts to incorporate American and Canadian Nisei in one article. At some point, perhaps it will make reasonable sense to re-name this article "Nisei Japanese Americans" ... which would mean that another article would need to be created -- something like "Nisei Canadian Americans"? --Tenmei (talk) 16:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask the same question that I did above - is the topic of Canadian Nisei really unique or notable enough for an article on its own? Like I've asked before, what's unique about Nisei, other than that they were born during the baby boom, that sets them apart from for example Sansei and Yonsei? I can definitely see how Issei deserves its own article because it covers their immigration. But I'm not sure I agree that Nisei, and by extension, Sansei, deserves their own articles. Most of what could be in these articles could either go in Japanese American or Japanese American history. I mean, just because there's a specific name for each generation of Japanese Americans doesn't mean we need to create an article out of each name. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 17:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not persuaded that this specific question, as you have framed it, is one that can be addressed; however, Wikipedia:Notability identifies a more easily approached set of issues. The mere fact that book publishers consider Issei, Nisei, and Sansei as independent worthy subjects becomes sufficient in satisfing the very minimal wiki-standards of notability. The further fact that academic or scholarly journals have published articles about the American and Canadian Issei, Nisei and Sansei becomes an additional demonstration of wiki-notability for the two sub-threads which are woven into the framework of this article.
My modest intentions here are not focused on bringing this stub to "Featured Article" status. I'm glad to leave that hard work to others who may contribute to this article in the months ahead. My narrowly-focused objective at this point is simply to provide an adequate first-draft beginning from which others can feel comfortable building. --Tenmei (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here are 21 reasons why Nisei should be considered a wiki-notable article:
1. Barney F. Hajiro[1]
2. Mikio Hasemoto[2]
3. Joe Hayashi[2]
4. Shizuya Hayashi.[3]
5. Daniel K. Inouye.[3]
6. Yeiki Kobashigawa.[4]
7. Robert T. Kuroda[4]
8. Kaoru Moto.[5]
9. Kiyoshi K. Muranaga.[5]
10. Masato Nakae.[6]
11. Shinyei Nakamine.[6]
12. William K. Nakamura.[7]
13. Joe M. Nishimoto.[7]
14. Allan M. Ohata.[8]
15. James K. Okubo.[8]
16. Yukio Okutsu.[9]
17. Frank H. Ono.[9]
18. Kazuo Otani.[10]
19. George T. Sakato.[11]
20. Ted T. Tanouye.[12]
These Nisei were each awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. --Tenmei (talk) 20:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that there are notable individuals who are Nisei doesn't really mean that the topic of Nisei itself is notable - that's like saying we can write an article called Americans born in the 1920s, because there are plenty of notable Americans born in the 1920s. But if the topic of Nisei has been specifically written about in literature, that's good enough for me. I'm not entirely convinced about Sansei and Yonsei though. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 20:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hong Qi Gong -- Aha, yes. I see your point. Your input here did help me improve the quality of what I was hoping to achieve. Thanks. Let me take this opportunity to invite you to keep your eye on Sansei over the next week or so. If you have further suggestions which will help me improve the modest foundation I hope to create, good. As for Yonsei, I'm not planning to create an article about progeny of the Sansei. --Tenmei (talk) 21:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 8.] June 4, 2008.
  2. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 9.] June 4, 2008.
  3. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 10.] June 4, 2008.
  4. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 12.] June 4, 2008.
  5. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 13.] June 4, 2008.
  6. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 14.] June 4, 2008.
  7. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 15.] June 4, 2008.
  8. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 16.] June 4, 2008.
  9. ^ a b Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 17.] June 4, 2008.
  10. ^ Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 18.] June 4, 2008.
  11. ^ Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 19.] June 4, 2008.
  12. ^ Medal of Honor: CRS RL30011, p. 20.] June 4, 2008.

Merger of Nikkei, Issei, Nisei, Sansei, Yonsei

[edit]

Hi

Can't we merge all these duplicating/ overlaping articles Issei, Nisei, Sansei and Yonsei into the Japanese diaspora (Nikkei) page? Besides the obvious repetition, just because these terms exist for the different generations, that is no justification for separate articles. We don't have separate articles on first, second, third generation French/ German/ Chinese/ Portuguese immigrants in WP content on immigrant communities. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 02:56, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.asiansinamerica.org/directory/dir_e_ja.html
    Triggered by \basiansinamerica\.org\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nisei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American-Nisei section is missing the entire rest of the story

[edit]

While most Nisei were loyal Americans with an outstanding record, all were not. Thousands of American-citizen Nisei were disloyal and that was the reason for and the necessity for the emergency TEMPORARY relocation from the West Coast Defense Zone, a declared combat zone. Professor Stephan of Hawaii has a database of about 5,000 or more documented names of Nisei American citizens who served in or with the Imperial Japanese armed forces, such as Tokyo Rose did. There were two American-citizen Nisei serving in the Japanese forces on Chichijima, when the American aviator POW's were killed and eaten. [See "Hawaii Under the Rising Sun" by John J. Stephan.] Thousands more either renounced U.S. citizenship or requested repatriation to Japan during and immediately after WWII. [For details on the disloyal Nisei and why the relocation was necessary, see "WWII JAPANESE RELOCATION CAMPS & the WRA: A Prudent, Emergency, War-time Measure" by Jim Cain.]Starhistory22 (talk) 10:16, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the template

[edit]

@Ajfweb (pinging you as you added it) I don't see what's necessarily still confusing about this. It's both an age-generational thing (late 1800s/early 1900s diaspora), and a technical term for second generation immigrant. The generational thing is what's most researched and talked about where the term is mentioned, so it will appear in RS in that context. I grew up around these terms so I may be too used to these terms to see what's not clear from a laymans perspective. DarmaniLink (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, I'll be removing it on 2/4 if there's no response DarmaniLink (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nisei&oldid=1209002156"