Talk:Paparazzi (Girls' Generation song)
Paparazzi (Girls' Generation song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 17, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Paparazzi (Girls' Generation song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Orphaned references in Paparazzi (Girls' Generation song)
[edit]I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Paparazzi (Girls' Generation song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "gaonchart.co.kr":
- From Mr. Taxi / Run Devil Run: "Gaon Album Chart — May 2011 Chart". Gaon (in Korean). Retrieved June 30, 2011.
- From Girls' Generation discography: "Gaon Chart" (in Korean). Gaon Chart. Retrieved May 28, 2013.
- From The Boys (Girls' Generation album): "Gaon Chart". Gaonchart.co.kr. Retrieved 2012-02-18.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Paparazzi (Girls' Generation song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 14:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Cartoon network freak and here's my review for this article:
Lead
[edit]"Paparazzi" is a Japanese song recorded by South Korean girl group Girls' Generation for their second Japanese studio album, Girls & Peace (2012). -> "Paparazzi" is a song recorded in Japanese language by South Korean girl group Girls' Generation for their sophomore studio album, Girls & Peace (2012).
- Not done — Changed the first clause, but is "sophomore" really makes the article better? I mean, this is only GA, so the term "second studio album" is acceptable
- Unlink lead single
- Done
- Miles Walker, "Paparazzi" was described as an electropop and R&B song. -> Miles Walker, the track was named an electropop and R&B recording.
- Not done — "described" is acceptable
- and Hey! Hey! Hey! Music Champ. A music video for the song directed by Toshiyuki Suzuki premiered on June 10, 2012. -> and Hey! Hey! Hey! Music Champ, while a music video directed by Toshiyuki Suzuki premiered on June 10, 2012 in order to accompany the release of "Paparazzi".
- previous Japanese single "Mr. Taxi" in 2011.-> previous Japanese-language single, "Mr. Taxi" (2011).
- Done
- It was -> The track was
- Done — But I still don't get why "It" is not suitable
- The single was -> Furthermore, the single was
- Not done — The two sentences do not have any link with each other
- Japan, peaking -> Japan, with it peaking
- Not done — could you explain more why "peaking" only is not suitable? I don't get it
- two on the -> two on both the
- Done
- It received certifications from the Recording Industry Association of Japan on two bases–physical sales (gold) and digital download (gold). -> "Paparazzi" was certified Gold in Japan for the sales of the single's digital and physical release, respectively.
Done — Simon (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Recording and release
[edit]"Paparazzi" is a Japanese song described as a hybrid of electropop and R&B. -> "Paparazzi" is a song recorded in Japanese language, which was described as a hybrid of electropop and R&B.
- Done
- Unlink "Japanese language"
- Done
- Becker, and produced by American producer Miles Walker. -> Becker, while production was handled by American producer Miles Walker
- Done
- The song was released -> The track was released (you've already used "song" before)
- Done
- If you say "Japanese song", it sounds like the recording has an identity; change it to "Japanese language"
- Done
- studio album Girls & Peace -> studio album, Girls & Peace (2012)
- Done
- "Paparazzi" was also released in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea in mid-2012 -> The release of "Paparazzi" as well reached Hong Kong...
Done
Promotion
[edit]the group dressed -> the group was dressed
- Changed to "wore"
- connect the two paragraphs
- Done
- The music video -> An accompanying music video
- Done Yet I still think "accompanying" is superfluous
- performing the choreography -> performing a choreography
- Done
- Girls' Generation. The show begins -> Girls' Generation, with the show beginning
- Not done I used semicolon instead
- They dance in-> Subsequently, the band dance sporting
- Not done "Subsequently"? It doesn't fit here
- outfits–the -> outfits – the
- Done
- Remove "the" in both cases for the outfits
- Done
- routines as -> routines for their
Done
Reception
[edit]Unlink music critics here and in the lead; do the same with certified gold in the lead
- Not done I don't know why they should be unlinked
- Hadfield writing for the Tokyo edition of Time Out compared -> Hadfield, writing for the Tokyo edition of Time Out, compared
- Done
- previous Japanese single -> the same as above
- Done
- single "Mr. Taxi" (2011) and -> single, "Mr. Taxi" (2011), and
- Not done I did change the sentence but not as above
- the 2011 single -> the latter single
- Done
- Connect all three paragraphs
- Not done Why? Three different ideas are presented and there is no connection between them
- was a commercial -> remained a commercial
- Not done What's wrong with "was"?
- Japan. It debuted -> Japan, debuting
- Done
- Oricon Singles Chart on the chart issue dated -> Oricon Singles Chart issued for
- Not done The current wording is fine for me
- physical copies of 2012 on the Oricon chart, selling selling 136,181 copies. -> physical release of 2012 on the Oricon chart, with it bringing total sales of 136,181 shipments
- Done
- rose to the -> rose up to the
- Done
- It ranked [...] on the year-end chart of 2012.-> "Paparazzi" ranked at [...] on that chart's year-end chart of 2012.; you've already used "it" before
- Done
- It also charted -> The track as well charted
- Done
- number five -> at number five
- Not done the preposition "at" was already included beforehand
- on the -> remove "the"
- Not done similar to "the Billboard Hot 100", "the Billboard Japan Hot 100" etc.
- and number two -> and at number two
- Not done As above
- sold 103,000 -> sold a total of 103,000
Not done Superfluous. — Simon (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Credits and personnel
[edit]Credits adapted from "Paparazzi" CD liner notes -> Credits adapted from the CD issue's liner notes
Charts
[edit]U.S. -> US
Done
Release history
[edit]Unlink digital download, CD & DVD; its overfous- The catalog number section is not really needed and remains, as well, overflous
- @HĐ: Outcome: On-hold for 7 days. Good luck! -Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the review. Though some points to me are quite superfluous, the review is very appreciated. Best regards, — Simon (talk) 13:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- @HĐ: Passing the article! Congratulations... Cartoon network freak (talk) 14:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Paparazzi (Girls' Generation song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610193728/http://satsuki.musicdb.gr.jp/all_info/ranking_weekly/WeeklyRankingAction.do?term=2012f&weeklyCd=20120626&rankKbn=50 to http://satsuki.musicdb.gr.jp/all_info/ranking_weekly/WeeklyRankingAction.do?term=2012f&weeklyCd=20120626&rankKbn=50
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class Korea-related articles
- Low-importance Korea-related articles
- WikiProject Korea popular culture working group
- WikiProject Korea articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- GA-Class electronic music articles
- Low-importance electronic music articles
- WikiProject Electronic music articles
- GA-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- GA-Class Women in music articles
- Unknown-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles