Jump to content

Talk:Quality Assurance International

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

how do QAI's organic certification requirements and processes differ from others in the industry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffschuler (talkcontribs) 17:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The examples section should be expanded or just removed altogether. PierceG (talk) 18:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kosher Certification, "Glatt" or not?

[edit]

I have removed the adjective "the strictest" from what is apparently some public relations person's discription of the joint STAR-K and QAI kosher certification.

To my mind "strictest kosher" has one of two meanings, it is either an Engish translation of "glatt kosher," the meaning of which differs by community and by time of the year; or, more loosely, “more kosher than his," in the sense of the desert island with two Jews and three synagogues, one for each and one that neither would be caught dead in. I doubt that anyone seriously disagrees with me on this, hired hands of Quality Assurance Inc. possibly excepted.

I would be perfectly happy is someone suggested a replacement, perhaps "widely respected." STAR-K have been in the business for a good long time, and they are as good at it as anyone.

David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 05:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Quality Assurance International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs attention

[edit]

This article is in desperate need of attention. Currently it reads like an advertisement written by the subject of the article. Additionally I think the connection to the NSF is important and should be mentioned in the body of the article. morsontologica (talk) 03:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]