Talk:Rajnath Singh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Untitled[edit]

Some links aired dead links, more reference should be added (Alex.mathews (talk) 13:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC))

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rajnath Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rajnath Singh/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The page does not have a balanced viewpoint of Rajnath Singh. It commends him for his achievements, while the controversies receive extremely short mention, which is absurd for a 'hardliner' Pulkit 14:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC) The whole article smacks of being highly politically motivated and biased in favour of the Subject , it should be better placed on BJP in house list of Who's who for Party workers .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliffatsea (talkcontribs) 09:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Last edited at 09:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 03:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)