Talk:Richard Saunders (skeptic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Richard Saunders (skeptic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Richard Saunders (skeptic)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I'm confused by the "low" rating of the Australian skeptics. If a skeptic movement isn't the humans that are part of it, well what is the most important. Richard Saunders is a hero to many and admired by both skeptics and "beleivers" alike. His popularity and work goes beyond mere borders. The article is well written and researched. I learned a lot about him through this article, and his varied interests and interesting life give a new face to the stereotype of the skeptic. I would never rate Richard Saunders bio "low". He's of utmost importance to skeptics all over the world. randigal

Last edited at 23:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 04:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Saunders (skeptic). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)